Several empirical studies have used the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE) to address issues of cross-cultural differences in mean level of self-esteem. The majority of these studies have mostly focused on the comparison of individual-level factor structures, leaving unanswered the issue regarding the equivalence of the factor structure of the RGSE across the individual and the culture-level, a condition called factor isomorphism. This is a particularly worrisome issue, given the large interest in cross-cultural variations of self-esteem levels. The present study was designed to address this concern by administering the RGSE across 37 different countries. The study used multilevel confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the equivalence of the individual- and culture-level factor structure of self-esteem. We found evidence for the cross-cultural stability of a bifactor structure of the RGSE, which emerged both at individual and culture-levels. However, only the general self-esteem factor showed a substantial degree of isomorphism. The specific factors capturing positive and negative self-evaluations resulted instead non-isomorphic. We discuss the implications of these results for the assessment of self-esteem in cross-cultural studies.
AlessandriG.VecchioneM.DonnellanB. M.TisakJ. (2013). An application of the LC-LSTM framework to the self-esteem instability case. Psychometrika, 78, 769-792. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9326-4
2.
AlessandriG.VecchioneM.EisenbergN.ŁagunaM. (2015). On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27, 621-635. doi:10.1037/pas0000073
3.
BlascovichJ.TomakaJ. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 115-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
BurischM. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39, 214-227. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.214
5.
ByrneB. M. (1983). Investigating measures of self-concept. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 16, 115-112.
6.
ByrneB. M.van de VijverF. J. R. (2014). Factorial structure of the Family Values Scale from a multilevel-multicultural perspective. International Journal of Testing, 14, 168-192. doi:10.1080/15305058.2013.870903
7.
DiggoryJ. C. (1966). Self-evaluation: Concepts and studies. New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
DiStefanoC.MotlR. W. (2009). Personality correlates of method effects due to negatively worded items on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 309-313. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.020
9.
DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W. (2011). Self-esteem: Enduring issues and controversies. In Chamorro-PremuzicT.von StummS.FurnhamA. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 718-746). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
DyerG. N.HangesJ. P.HallJ. R. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 149-167.
11.
FeskensR.HoxJ. J. (2011). Multilevel structural equation modeling for cross-cultural research: Exploring resampling methods to overcome small sample size problems. In DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 341-356). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
12.
FontaineJ. R. J.FischerR. (2011). Data-analytic approaches for investigating isomorphism between the individual-level and the culture-level internal structure. In MatsumotoD.van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 273-298). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GecasV. (1971). Parental behavior and dimensions of adolescent self-evaluation. Sociometry, 34, 466-482. doi:10.2307/2786193
14.
GreenbergerE.ChenC.DmitrievaJ.FarruggiaS. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter?Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1241-1254. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8
15.
GuenoleN. (2016). The importance of isomorphism for conclusions about homology: A Bayesian multilevel structural equation modelling approach with ordinal indicators. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 289. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00289
16.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932-942. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
17.
HoxJ. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
KaplanH. B. (1980). Self-attitudes and deviant behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
19.
KaplanH. B.PokornyA. D. (1969). Self-derogation and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 149, 421-434.
20.
KaufmanE.RasinskiK. A.LeeR.WestJ. (1991). Quality of the responses of eighth-grade students in NELS88: National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
21.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
LordF. M.NovickM. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Welsley.
24.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F.NagengastB. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366-381. doi:10.1037/a0019225
MotlR. W.DiStefanoC. (2002). Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 562-578. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_6
27.
MuthénB. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376-398.
28.
PornprasertmanitS.LeeJ.PreacherK. J. (2014). Ignoring clustering in confirmatory factor analysis: Some consequences for model fit and standardized parameter estimates. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 518-543. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.933762
29.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151-161. doi:10.1177/0146167201272002
30.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Różycka-TranJ.BoskiP.WojciszkeB. (2015). Belief in a Zero-Sum Game Belief as a social axiom: A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 46, 525-548. doi:10.1177/0022022115572226
32.
SaadaG. K.BaillyY.JoulainN.HervéM.AlaphilippeC. A. (2013). Longitudinal factorial invariance of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Determining the nature of method effects due to item wording. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 406-416. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.011
33.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623-642. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
34.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
35.
SchwartzS. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In JowellR.RobertsC.FitzgeraldR.EvaG. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169-203). London, England: Sage.
36.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-112. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
37.
TafarodiR. W.SwannW. B.Jr. (1995). Self-linking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 322-342. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_8
38.
TayL.WooS. E.VermuntJ. K. (2014). A conceptual and methodological framework of cross-level isomorphism: Psychometric validation of multilevel constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 77-106. doi:10.1177/1094428113517008
39.
TomásJ.OliverA. (1999). Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84-98. doi:10.1080/10705519909540120
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
