Culture and the Working Life

Abstract

Work centrality has been defined as individual beliefs regarding the importance of work in one’s life (Kostek, 2012). In previous research, however, the importance of work has rarely been contrasted with the importance of other life domains and never across sufficient cultural groups to enable cultural moderation of processes around work centrality to be unpackaged. Accordingly, the present study explores the relative centrality of work (RCW) in the lives of employed men and women around the world, examining its predictors by personal attitudes toward work and independence in the individual’s work context. Given that national cultures socialize their members differently regarding the goals of life, we explore the moderating influence of national Self-directedness versus Other-directedness and Civility versus Practicality (Bond & Lun, 2014) along with gender on these individual-level processes. Using 29,080 respondents to the World Values Survey from representative samples of employees in 45 countries, we found that RCW is predicted pan-nationally by the attitude complex, “work as good” (WAG). A nation’s Self-directedness and its Civility, however, amplify WAG effects. Independence at work only associates with RCW for males and for persons in nations socializing its members for Self-directedness and for Civility. These results show how gender and national cultures moderate the predictors of RCW for individual lives around the world, making many of these findings culture-bound.

Keywords

relative centrality of work (RCW)work as good (WAG)independence at work (WI)national goals for the socialization of children gender/sex World Value Survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arvey

R. D.

Harpaz

Liao

(2004). Work centrality and post-award work behavior of lottery winners. Journal of Psychology, 138, 404-420.

Bal

P. M.

Kooij

(2011). The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20, 497-523.

Bellah

R. N.

Madsen

Sullivan

W. M.

Swidler

Tipton

S. M.

(1985). Habits of the heart. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Bielby

D. D.

(1992). Commitment to work and family. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 281-302.

Blood

M. R.

(1969). Work values and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 456-459.

Bond

M. H.

(2013). A general model for explaining situational influence on individual social behavior: Refining Lewin’s formula. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 1-15.

Bond

M. H.

Leung

Tong

K.-K.

de Carrasquel

S. R.

Murakami

. . . Lewis

J. R.

(2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 548-570.

Bond

M. H.

Lun

V. M.-C.

(2014). Citizen-making: The role of national goals for socializing children. Social Science Research, 44, 75-85.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464-504.

10.

Cinamon

R. G.

Rich

(2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 47, 531-541.

11.

Davis

S. N.

Greenstein

T. N.

(2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87-105.

12.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

13.

Demerouti

(2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 266-280.

14.

Diefendorff

J. M.

Brown

D. J.

Kamin

A. M.

Lord

R. G.

(2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 93-108.

15.

Dubin

(1956). Industrial workers’ worlds: A study of the “central life interests” of industrial workers. Social Problems, 3, 131-142.

16.

Eccles

J. S.

(1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.

17.

England

G. W.

Harpaz

(1990). How working is defined: National contexts and demographic and organizational role influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 253-266.

18.

England

G. W.

Misumi

(1986). Work centrality in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 399-416.

19.

Fischer

Milfont

T. L.

(2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 88-96.

20.

Furnham

(1990). The protestant work ethic: The psychology of work-related beliefs and behaviors. New York, NY: Routledge.

21.

Gardner

D. G.

Cummings

L. L.

Dunham

R. B.

Pierce

J. L.

(1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Education and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898-915.

22.

Greenhaus

J. H.

Collins

K. M.

Shaw

J. D.

(2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510-531.

23.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

24.

Harpaz

(1997). Work centrality in Germany, Israel, Japan, and the United States. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 171-200.

25.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Huang

Van de Vliert

(2003). Comparing work behaviors across cultures: A cross-level approach using multilevel modeling. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 167-182.

27.

Inglehart

(1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

28.

Inglehart

Oyserman

(2004). Individualism, autonomy, and self-expression: The human development syndrome. In Vinken

Soeters

Ester

(Eds.), Comparative cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 74-96). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

29.

Jing

Bond

M. H.

(2015). Sources for trusting most people: How national goals for socializing children promote the contributions made by trust of the in-group and the out-group to non-specific trust. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 191-210.

30.

Kenrick

D. T.

(2012). Evolutionary theory and human social behavior. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 11-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Kostek

J. A.

(2012). Work centrality: A meta-analysis of the nomological network (Master’s thesis). Bowling Green State University, OH.

32.

Lorence

(1987). A test of “gender” and “job” models of sex differences in job involvement. Social Forces, 66, 121-142.

33.

Mannheim

(1975). A comparative study of work centrality, job rewards and satisfaction. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 2, 79-102.

34.

Mannheim

(1993). Gender and the effects of demographics, status and work values on WRC. Work and Occupations, 20, 3-22.

35.

Marks

S. R.

(1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.

36.

Meaning of Working International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. London, England: Academic Press.

37.

Milfont

T. L.

Fischer

(2010).Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 88-96.

38.

Miller

Woehr

D. J.

Hudspeth

(2001). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 1-39.

39.

Mirels

H. L.

Garrett

J. B.

(1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40-44.

40.

Mitusch

(2000). Job independence as an incentive device. Economica, 266, 245-263.

41.

Moen

Smith

K. R.

(1986). Women at work: Commitment and behavior over the life course. Sociological Forum, 3, 450-475.

42.

Mortimer

J. T.

Lorence

(1989). Satisfaction and involvement: Disentangling a deceptively simple relationship. Social Psychological Quarterly, 52, 249-265.

43.

Parboteeah

Cullen

J. B.

(2003). Social institutions and work centrality: Explorations beyond national culture. Organization Science, 14, 137-148.

44.

Paullay

I. M.

Alliger

G. M.

Stone-Romero

E. F.

(1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 224-228.

45.

Smith

P. B.

Dugan

Trompenaars

(1996). National culture and managerial values: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.

46.

Van de Vliert

Huang

Levine

R. V.

(2004). National wealth and thermal climate as predictors of motives for volunteer work. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 62-73.

47.

Vroom

V. H.

(1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB