Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to investigate the presence of gender stereotypes concerning occupational roles and sexualization in newspaper advertisements of two European countries very different for cultural values and gender equality, that is, Italy and the Netherlands. The top three newspapers by circulation in each country were selected. We included all the issues of these newspapers published in 1 month. We selected all the advertisings of a quarter a page in size or larger containing at least one adult human. Using content analysis, 1,666 characters depicted in the selected advertisings were coded by independent judges. Results demonstrated that men were primarily featured in playing professional roles, whereas women were more frequently presented as decorative. Compared with males, female characters were also more frequently sexualized, and this phenomenon was stronger in the more gender-unequal country, that is, Italy. Because of the role of advertising in shaping the cultural values, policy makers and cultural promoters should try to further with some kind of incentive a more equalitarian representation of genders in advertisings.

Keywords

gender stereotypes advertising mass media sexualization gender roles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kim

(2007). Relating Hofstede’s masculinity dimension to gender role portrayals in advertising: A cross-cultural comparison of web advertisements. International Marketing Review, 24, 181-207.

Davies

P. G.

Spencer

S. J.

Quinn

D. M.

Gerhardstein

(2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628.

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.

Eisend

(2010). A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 418-440.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Roberts

T. A.

(1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.

Hofstede

(1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). London, England: Sage.

Hofstede

(1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London, England: McGraw-Hill.

Holbrook

M. B.

(1987). Mirror, mirror on the wall, what’s unfair in the reflections on advertising. Journal of Marketing, 51, 95-103.

Lamoreaux

Morling

(2011). Outside the head and outside individualism-collectivism: Further meta-analyses of cultural products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 299-327.

10.

Langlois

J. H.

Kalakanis

Rubenstein

A. J.

Larson

Hallam

Smoot

(2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.

11.

Mager

Helgeson

J. G.

(2011). Fifty years of advertising images: Some changing perspectives on role portrayals along with enduring consistencies. Sex Roles, 64, 238-252.

12.

Milner

L. M.

Collins

J. M.

(2000). Sex-role portrayals and the gender of nations. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 67-79.

13.

Moradi

Huang

Y. P.

(2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377-398.

14.

Nowatski

Morry

M. M.

(2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 95-107.

15.

Odekerken-Schröder

De Wulf

Hofstee

(2002). Is gender stereotyping in advertising more prevalent in masculine countries? A cross-national analysis. International Marketing Review, 9, 408-419.

16.

Plakoyiannaki

Zotos

(2009). Female role stereotypes in print advertising: Identifying associations with magazine and product categories. European Journal of Marketing, 43, 1411-1434.

17.

Pollay

R. W.

(1986). The distorted mirror: Reflections on the unintended consequences of advertising. Journal of Marketing, 50, 18-36.

18.

Rollero

(2013). Men and women facing objectification: The effects of media models on well-being, self-esteem and ambivalent sexism. Revista de Psicologia Social, 28, 373-382.

19.

Rollero

Glick

Tartaglia

(2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 149-159.

20.

Rollero

Tartaglia

(2013). Men and women at work: The effects of objectification on competence, pay, and fit for the job. Studia Psychologica, 55, 139-152.

21.

United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.

22.

Wiles

J. A.

Charles

R. C.

Tjernlund

(1995). A comparison of gender role portrayals in magazine advertising: The Netherlands, Sweden and the USA. European Journal of Marketing, 29(11), 35-49.

Gender Stereotyping in Newspaper Advertisements

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References