Nation-level differences in individuals’ reports of helping strangers, donating money to charity, and volunteering time were analyzed, drawing on nationally representative survey data from 135 nations. Frequency of these three behaviors yielded a reliable index of pro-social behavior. All three behaviors were found to be more frequent in nations that score low on an index of in-group favoritism and score low on uncertainty avoidance. Helping a stranger was also more frequent in nations with greater income inequality. The use of a wide sample of nations provides a more valid understanding of what kinds of cultures favor pro-social actions and indicates that national wealth is a less important contributor to the differences that are found than is the case in other aspects of cultural difference.
AkninL. B.Barrington-LeighC. P.DunnE. W.HelliwellJ. F.BurnsJ.Biswas-DienerR.. . . NortonM. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 635-652. doi:10.1037/a0031578
2.
AllikJ.McCraeR. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 13-28.
3.
AllikJ.RealoA. (2004). Individualism-collectivism and social capital. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 29-49.
4.
BondM. H.LunV. (2014). Citizen-making: The role of national goals for socializing children. Social Science Research, 44, 75-85.
5.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33 nation study. Science, 332, 1100-1104.
6.
GheorghiuM.VignolesV.SmithP. B. (2009). Beyond the United States and Japan: Testing Yamagishi’s emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 365-383.
7.
HandyF.CnaanR. A.BrudneyJ. L.AscoliU.MaijsL. C. (2000). Public perception of who is a volunteer: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. Voluntas, 11, 45-65.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV., & GLOBE associates. (2004). Leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
JingY.BondM. H. (2015). Sources for trusting most people: How national goals for socializing children promote the contributions made by trust of the in-group and the out-group to non-specific trust. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 191-210.
12.
KnafoA.SchwartzS. H.LevineR. (2009). Helping strangers is lower in embedded cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 875-879.
13.
KongD. T. (2012). Examining a climato-economic contextualization of generalized social trust mediated by uncertainty avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 574-588.
14.
LevineR. V.NorenzayanA.PhilbrickK. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 543-560.
15.
OishiS.DienerE.LucasR. E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346-360.
16.
PiliavinJ. A.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS.L.ClarkR. D. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press.
17.
RealoA.AllikJ.GreenfieldB. (2008). Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 447-462.
18.
RothsteinB.UslanerE. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58, 41-72.
19.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KağitçibasiC.ChoiS. C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
SchwartzS. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In VinkenH.SoetersJ.EsterP. (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43-73). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
21.
SmithP. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50-61.
22.
SmithP. B. (2011). Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 216-233.
23.
SmithP. B.FischerR.VignolesV. L.BondM. H. (2013). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Engaging with others in a changing world. London, England: Sage.
24.
StavrovaO.SiegerP. (2014). Religious pro-sociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on pro-social and moral attitudes and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 315-333.
25.
Van de VliertE. (2009). Climate, affluence and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Van de VliertE. (2011). Climato-economic origins of variation in in-group favoritism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 494-515.
27.
Van de VliertE.HuangX.LevineR. V. (2004). National wealth and thermal climate as predictors of motives for volunteer work. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 62-71.
28.
Van de VliertE.HuangX.ParkerP. M. (2004). Do colder and hotter climates make richer societies more, but poorer societies less, happy and altruistic?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 17-30.
29.
Van de VliertE.SmithP. B. (2004). Leader reliance on subordinates in climates that differ in development and climate. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 381-403.
30.
Van de VliertE.Van der VegtG. S.JanssenO. (2009). Pro-social to egotistic enculturation of our children: A climato-economic contextualization. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2, 123-137.
31.
WelzelC. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values? A civicness test. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 152-174.
32.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London, England: Allen Lane.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
