We examine what situational cues may influence corruption intentions of individuals in a high corruption context. We primed Brazilian participants with images related to corruption, but with different behavioral connotations (either images suggesting political corruption or images of a Malandro, a powerless antihero who blurs moral boundaries by breaking the law to survive). Corruption intentions increased in Studies 1 and 2 when individuals were primed with political corruption images, compared with a control condition. In Study 2, Brazilians who strongly identified with their country were more likely to endorse corruption scenarios, particularly when primed with Malandro images due to the dual activation of positive national symbols and morally ambiguous connotations. These findings highlight that conceptually related symbols within a cultural system can be linked to differential behavioral patterns. We outline some implications for corruption and cultural research, in particular, the need to study intracultural variability of psychological processes.
ArielyD. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lied to everyone—Especially ourselves. New York, NY: Harper.
2.
AzfarO.LeeY.SwamyA. (2001). The causes and consequences of corruption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 573, 42-56.
3.
BarbosaL. (2006). O jeitinho brasileiro: A arte de ser mais igual do que os outros [The Brazilian jeitinho: The art of being more equal than others]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Elsevier.
4.
ChaoM. M.ChenJ.RoismanG. I.HongY. Y. (2007). Essentializing race: Implications for bicultural individuals’ cognition and physiological reactivity. Psychological Science, 18, 341-348. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01901.x
5.
ChiuC-y.GelfandM.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482-493. doi:10.1177/1745691610375562
6.
CostaJ. F. (1994). A ética e o espelho da cultura [Ethics and the mirror of culture]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Rocco.
7.
DaMattaR. (1997). Carnavais, malandros e heróis—para uma sociologia do dilema brasileiro [Carnivals, Malandros and Heroes—Towards a sociology of the Brazilian dilemma]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Rocco. (Original work published 1979)
8.
FerreiraM. C.FischerR.PortoJ.PilatiR.MilfontT. (2012). Unravelling the mystery of Brazilian jeitinho: A cultural exploration of social norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 331-344. doi:10.1177/0146167211427148
9.
FischerR. (2006). Congruence and functions of personal and cultural values: Do my values reflect my culture’s values?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1419-1431. doi:10.1177/0146167206291425
10.
FischerR. (2012). Intersubjective culture: Indeed intersubjective or yet another form of subjective assessment? [Special issue: Personality and Culture]Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71, 13-20. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000067
11.
FischerR. (2013). What values can (and cannot) tell us about individuals, society and culture. Advances in Culture and Psychology, 4, 218-272.
12.
FreyreG. (1963). Casa grande & senzala [The big house and the slave quarters] (12th ed.). Brasilia, Brazil: University of Brasilia.
GinoF.ArielyD. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459. doi:10.1037/a0026406
15.
GinoF.AyalS.ArielyD. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behaviour. Psychological Science, 20, 393-398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
16.
GoslinP. A. (2004). How to be a Carioca: The alternative guide for the tourist in Rio. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: TwoCan Press.
17.
GouveiaV. V.GuerraV. M.SousaD. M. F.SantosW. S.CostaJ. M. (2009). Escala de Desejabilidade Social de Marlowe-Crowne: Evidências de sua Validade Fatorial e Consistência Interna [The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale: Evidence of factorial validity and internal consistency]. Avaliação Psicológica, 8, 87-98.
18.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
19.
HirshJ. B.GalinskyA. D.ZhongC. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behaviour. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415-427.
20.
HolandaS. B. (1973). Raízes do Brasil [Roots of Brazil] (7th ed.). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Livraria José Olympio Editora.
21.
HustedB. W. (1999). Wealth, culture and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 339-359.
22.
KuperA. (1999). Culture—The anthropologists’ account. London, England: Harvard University Press.
23.
KwanL. Y-Y.ChiuC-y.LeungA. K.-y. (in press). Priming Bush (vs. Obama) increases favorable evaluations of American brands: Intersubjective basis of cultural symbolism. Social Influence.
24.
LeachC.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM.PennekampS.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
25.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the “Field at a Given Time.”Psychological Review, 50, 292-310.
26.
LichtA.GoldschmidtC.SchwartzS. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 659-688.
27.
MazarN.AggarwalP. (2011). Greasing the palm: Can collectivism promote bribery?Psychological Science, 22, 843-848. doi:10.1177/0956797611412389
28.
O’ConnorS.FischerR. (2012). Predicting societal corruption across time: Values, wealth or institutions?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 644-659. doi:10.1177/0022022111402344
29.
OysermanD.LeeS. (2008). Does culture affect what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 313-342. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311
30.
PilatiR.MilfontT.FerreiraM. C.PortoJ. B.FischerR. (2011). Brazilian jeitinho: Understanding and explaining an indigenous psychological construct. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 45, 29-38.
31.
RibeiroD. (1995). O povo brasileiro [The Brazilian people]. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Companhia de Bolso.
32.
SandholtzW.TaageperaR. (2005). Corruption, culture, and communism. International Review of Sociology, 15, 109-131.
33.
SmithD. J. (2005). A culture of corruption. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
SwamyA.KnackS.LeeY.AzfarO. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 25-55.
35.
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211-244.
36.
VauclairC. M.FischerR. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multi-level approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 645-657.
37.
ViannaH. (1999). The mystery of samba: Popular music and national identity in Brazil. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
38.
YouJ. S.KhagramS. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70, 136-157.
39.
ZhongC. B.LakeV. B.GinoF. (2010). A good lamp is the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behaviour. Psychological Science, 21, 311-314.
