In a demanding test of measurement invariance, we examine the relative cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of social axioms in samples from 23 nations (total N = 7,275). With some modifications, results showed modest evidence of both configural and factorial invariance of the measure. Even such modest evidence is impressive in such a diverse sample and with such a stringent test, but nonetheless, areas are noted where the Social Axioms Survey could be improved to achieve better fit for invariance tests.
BeierleinC.DavidovE.SchmidtP.SchwartzS.RammstedtB. (2012). Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire items—A replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009). Survey Research Methods, 6, 25-36.
2.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In BohmstedtG. W.BorgattaE. F. (Eds.), Social measurement (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
3.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (1998). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6, 93-110.
5.
FischerR.LunV. M. (2008). Measuring cognition and motivation across cultural groups. In SorrentinoR. M.YamaguchiS. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 567-590). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
GariA.PanagiotopoulouP.MylonasK. (2009). Social axioms in Greece: Etic and emic dimensions and their relationships with locus of control. In LeungK.BondM. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 197-216). New York, NY: Springer.
7.
HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332-346.
8.
HorstP. (1966). An overview of the essentials of multivariate analysis methods. In CattellR. B. (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 129-152). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
9.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
10.
HuiC.HuiN. (2009). The mileage from social axioms: Learning from the past and looking forward. In LeungK.BondM. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 13-30). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
IsmailR. (2009). Social axioms among Malay, Chinese, and Kadazan students in Sabah, Malaysia: Differences in gender and ethnic groups. In LeungK.BondM. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 95-127). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
KemmelmeierM.SaucierG. (2013, June). Response styles in cross-cultural perspective: Creating optimal measures and testing new hypotheses. Paper presented at the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
13.
KennyD. A.McCoachD. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-335.
14.
KnoppenD.SarisW. (2009). Do we have to combine values in the Schwartz’ Human Values Scale? A comment on the Davidov studies. Survey Research Methods, 3, 91-103.
15.
LeungK.BondM. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multicultural perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 122-199.
16.
LeungK.BondM. H.de CarrasquelS. R.MunozC.HernandezM.MurakamiF.. . .SingelisT. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286-302.
17.
LeungK.LamB. C.BondM. H.ConwayL. G.GornickL. J.AmponsahB.. . .ZhouF. (2012). Developing and evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in eleven countries: Its relationship with the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 833-857.
18.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
19.
SafdarS.LewisJ. R.GreenglassE.DaneshpourM. (2009). An examination of proactive coping and social beliefs among Christians and Muslims. In LeungK.BondM. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 177-196). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
SaucierG.KennerJ.IurinoK.Bou MalhamP.ChenZ.ThalmayerA. G.KovalevaA. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in a global “survey of world views.” Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
SaucierG.SrivastavaS. (in press). What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the Big Five and alternatives. In CooperM. L.LarsenR. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 3. Personality processes and individual differences. Washington, DC: APA Books.
22.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.. . . KontyM. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663-688.
23.
SpiniD. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz Value Survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 3-23.
24.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organization Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
25.
Van de VijverF. J.ValchevV. H.SuanetI. (2009). Structural equivalence and differential item functioning in the Social Axioms Survey. In LeungK.BondM. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 51-93). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
WigginsJ. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
