According to Schwartz’s theoretical model of values, personal values are integrated in a two-dimensional circumplex structure, reflecting conflicts and compatibilities of their motivational contents. Albeit in large number, so far, all empirical studies supporting the model were based on correlations across individuals, thus capturing the circumplex structure as an emergent phenomenon of the sample. Using large representative data sets from 17 European countries, we test whether the structure also accounts for value conflict and congruity on the intraindividual level and whether this generalizes across cultures. Despite some intercultural differences in the degree, we find the circumplex model generally to be a good representation of intraindividual value (in-)compatibilities. The fit to the model was moderated by age and value preference: Persons whose value profiles show a poor fit to the model are (a) younger than the majority and (b) endorse values that are usually considered less important. Implications for research on motivational conflicts and compatibilities of values are discussed.
BardiA.LeeJ. A.TowfighN.SoutarG. (2009). The structure of intra-individual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 913-929.
2.
BilskyW. (2006). On the structure of motives: Beyond the “big three.” In BraunM.MohlerP. P. (Eds.), Beyond the horizon of measurement (pp. 73-84). Mannheim, Germany: ZUMA.
3.
BilskyW.JanikM.SchwartzS. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values—Evidence from three rounds of the European social survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759-776.
4.
BilskyW.SchwartzS. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163-181.
5.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1-28.
6.
CohrsJ. C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425-1434.
7.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654-677.
8.
ESS Round 3: European Social Survey Round 3 Data. (2006). Data file edition 3.2. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data archive and distributor of ESS data.
9.
ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. (2008). Data file edition 1.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data archive and distributor of ESS data.
10.
FischerR.VauclairC.-M.FontaineJ.SchwartzS. H. (2010). Are individual- and culture-level value structures different? Testing Hofstede’s legacy with Schwartz’s data. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 135-151.
11.
FontaineJ.PoortingaH.DelbekeL.SchwartzS. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345-365.
12.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values (Abridged ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
InglehartR. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
15.
LeeJ. A.SoutarG.LouviereJ. (2008). The best-worst scaling approach: An alternative to Schwartz’s Values Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 335-347.
16.
LuL. (2006). “Cultural fit”: Individual and societal discrepancies in values, beliefs, and subjective well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 203-221.
17.
MaioG. R.PakizehA.CheungW.ReesK. J. (2009). Changing, priming, and acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 699-715.
18.
OishiS.DienerE.SuhE.LucasR. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157-184.
19.
OysermanD.LeeS. W. S. (2007). Priming “culture”: Culture as situated cognition. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 255-279). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
OysermanD.LeeS. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342.
21.
PakizehA.GebauerJ. E.MaioG. R. (2007). Basic human values: Inter-value structure in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 458-465.
22.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS. H.KnafoA. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801.
23.
RossteutscherS. (2004). Von Realisten und Konformisten - Wider die Theorie der Wertsymhese [On realists and conformists—A critique of the theory of value synthesis]. Kölner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 56, 407-432.
24.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177-198.
25.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
27.
SchwartzS. H. (1999). Theory of Cultural Values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23-47.
SchwartzS. H. (2005a). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In TamayoA.PortoJ. B. (Eds.), Valores e Comportamento nas Organizaçoes [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 21-55). Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.
30.
SchwartzS. H. (2005b). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In TamayoA.PortoJ. (Eds.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work] (pp. 56-95). Brasilia, Brazil: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
31.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385-410.
32.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
33.
SchwartzS. H.BilskyW. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
34.
SchwartzS. H.BilskyW. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
35.
SchwartzS. H.BoehnkeK. (2004). Evaluating the strucure of human values with condirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Reaseach in Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550-562.
36.
SchwartzS. H.MelechG.LehmannA.BurgessS.HarrisM.OwensV. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
37.
SchwartzS. H.SagivL. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
38.
SheldonK. M. (2005). Positive value change during college: Normative trends and individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 209-223.
39.
TetlockP. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
40.
TetlockP. E.PetersonR. S.LernerJ. S. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In ZannaM. P.SeligmanC.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 25-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
VerkasaloM.LonnqvistJ. E.LipsanenJ.HelkamaK. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21-item Portrait Values Questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 780-792.
42.
VinkenH.SoetersJ.EsterP. (2004). Cultures and dimensions, classic perspectives and new opportunities in “dimensionalist” cross-cultural studies. In VinkenH.EsterP.SoetersJ. (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 5-27). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
