Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism

Abstract

The construct of individualism–collectivism (IND-COL) has become the definitive standard in cross-cultural psychology, management, and related fields. It is also among the most controversial, in particular, with regard to the ambiguity of its dimensionality: Some view IND and COL as the opposites of a single continuum, whereas others argue that the two are independent constructs. We explored the issue through seven different tests using original individual-level data from 50 studies and meta-analytic data from 149 empirical publications yielding a total of 295 sample-level observations that were collected using six established instruments for assessing IND and COL as separate constructs. Results indicated that the dimensionality of IND-COL may depend on (a) the specific instrument used to collect the data, (b) the sample characteristics and the cultural region from which the data were collected, and (c) the level of analysis. We also review inconsistencies, deficiencies, and challenges of conceptualizing IND-COL and provide guidelines for developing and selecting instruments for measuring the construct, and for reporting and meta-analyzing results from this line of research.

Keywords

values attitudes beliefs cultural psychology history of psych

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bresnahan

M. J.

Levine

T. R.

Shearman

S. M.

Lee

S. Y.

Park

C.-Y.

Kiyomiya

(2005). A multi-method multi-trait validity assessment of self-construal in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Human Communication Research, 31, 33-59.

Brewer

M. B.

Chen

(2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151.

Carrigan

P. M.

(1960). Extraversion-introversion as a dimension of personality: A reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 329-360.

Clark

H. H.

Schober

M. F.

(1992). Asking questions and influencing answers. In Tanur

J. M.

(Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 15-48). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cohen

(1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Constantinople

(1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2001). Cultural orientations in the United States: (Re)examining differences among ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 348-364.

Deshpande

S. P.

Joseph

Viswesvaran

(1994). Does use of student samples affect results of studies in cross-cultural training? A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 74, 779-785.

Dorfman

Howell

J. P.

(1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In Farmer

R. N.

McGoun

E. G.

(Eds.), Advances in international comparative management (pp. 127-150). London, England: JAI Press.

10.

Earley

P. C.

(1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348.

11.

Fischer

(2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263-282.

12.

Fischer

Milfont

T. L.

(2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 88-96.

13.

Fischer

Milfont

T. L.

Gouveia

V. V.

(2011). Does social context affect value structures? Testing the intra-cultural stability of value structures with a functional theory of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 253-270.

14.

Fontaine

J. R. J.

Poortinga

Y. H.

Delbeke

Schwartz

S. H.

(2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345-365.

15.

Green

D. P.

Salovey

(1999). In what sense are positive and negative affect independent? A reply to Tellegen, Watson, and Clark. Psychological Science, 10, 304-312.

16.

Gudykunst

W. G.

Matsumoto

Ting-Toomey

Nishida

(1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.

17.

Harzing

A.-W.

(2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243-264.

18.

Hofstede

(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

19.

Hofstede

(2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 882-897.

20.

House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

P. W.

Gupta

(Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

21.

Hui

C. H.

(1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.

22.

Hui

C. H.

Triandis

H. C.

(1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296-309.

23.

Javidan

House

R. J.

Dorfman

P. W.

Hanges

P. J.

Sully

Luque

(2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 897-914.

24.

Kim

M. S.

Leung

(1997). A revised Self-Construal Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu.

25.

Kim

M. S.

Sharkey

W. F.

(1995). Independent and interdependent construals of self: Explaining cultural patterns of interpersonal communication in multicultural organizational settings. Communication Quarterly, 43, 20-38.

26.

Kirkman

B. L.

Lowe

K. B.

Gibson

C. B.

(2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285-320.

27.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.

28.

Kluckhohn

F. R.

Strodtbeck

F. L.

(1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

29.

Komarraju

Cokley

K. O.

(2008). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: A comparison of African Americans and European Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 336-343.

30.

Kuhn

M. H.

McPartland

(1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.

31.

Lam

S. S. K.

Chen

X.-P.

Schaubroeck

(2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 905-914.

32.

Lance

C. E.

Butts

M. M.

Michaels

L. C.

(2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202-220.

33.

Levine

T. R.

Bresnahan

M. J.

Park

H. S.

Lapinski

M. K.

Wittenbaum

G. M.

Shearman

S. M.

. . .Ohashi

(2003). Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29, 210-252.

34.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

35.

Meehl

P. E.

(1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.

36.

Muchinsky

P. M.

(1996). The correction for attenuation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 63-75.

37.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

38.

Oyserman

(1993). The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993-1009.

39.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.

40.

Rhee

Uleman

J. S.

Lee

H. K.

(1996). Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1037-1053.

41.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

(2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162-173.

42.

Singelis

T. M.

(1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.

43.

Singelis

T. M.

Triandis

H. C.

Bhawuk

D. P. S.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.

44.

Smith

P. B.

(2004). In search of acquiescent response bias. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50-61.

45.

Smith

P. B.

Fischer

(2008). Acquiescence, extreme response bias, and culture: A multilevel analysis. In van

F. R.

Vijver

van Hemert

D. A.

Poortinga

Y. H.

(Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 285-314). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

46.

Spearman

(1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101.

47.

Steel

Taras

(2010). Culture as a consequence: A multilevel multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values. Journal of International Management, 16, 211-233.

48.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

49.

Takata

(1993). Social comparison and formation of self-concept in adolescent: Some findings about Japanese college students. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 41, 339-348.

50.

Taras

(2013). Catalogue of instruments for measuring culture. Retrieved from http://www.vtaras.com/Culture_Survey_Catalogue.pdf

51.

Taras

Kirkman

B. L.

Steel

(2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 405-439.

52.

Taras

Rowney

Steel

(2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Approaches, challenges, limitations, and suggestions based on the analysis of 112 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15, 357-373.

53.

Taras

Steel

Kirkman

B. L.

(2012). The times they are A-Changin’: Improving cultural indices and rankings based on a meta-analysis of Hofstede’s dimensions. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 329-341.

54.

Trafimow

Triandis

H. C.

Goto

S. G.

(1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-665.

55.

Triandis

H. C.

(1983). Allocentric vs. idiocentric social behavior: A major cultural difference between Hispanics and mainstream (Technical reports). Champaign: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois.

56.

Triandis

H. C.

(1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.

57.

Triandis

H. C.

(1994). INDCOL (Unpublished research scale on individualism and collectivism). Champaign: University of Illinois.

58.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.

59.

Tsui

A. S.

Nifadkar

S. S.

A. Y.

(2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33, 426-478.

60.

Vargas

J. H.

Kemmelmeier

(2013). Ethnicity and contemporary American culture: A meta-analytic investigation of horizontal-vertical individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 195-222.

61.

Voronov

Singer

J. A.

(2002). The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 461-480.