A behavioral signature of cross-cultural competence is discriminative use of culturally appropriate behavioral strategies in different cultural contexts. Given the central role communication plays in cross-cultural adjustment and adaptation, the present investigation examines how meta-knowledge of culture—defined as knowledge of what members of a certain culture know—affects culturally competent cross-cultural communication. We reported two studies that examined display of discriminative, culturally sensitive use of cross-cultural communication strategies by bicultural Hong Kong Chinese (Study 1), Chinese students in the United States and European Americans (Study 2). Results showed that individuals formulating a communicative message for a member of a certain culture would discriminatively apply meta-knowledge of the culture. These results suggest that unsuccessful cross-cultural communications may arise not only from the lack of motivation to take the perspective of individuals in a foreign culture, but also from inaccurate meta-knowledge of the foreign culture.
AngS.Van DyneL.KohC.NgK. Y.TemplerK.TayC.ChandrasekarN. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3, 335-371.
2.
BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (2012). Social metacognition: Thinking about thinking in social psychology. In BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3.
BrislinR. W. (2009). Theory, critical incidents, and the preparation of people for intercultural experiences. In WyerR. S.ChiuC.-Y.HongY.-Y. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 379-392). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
ChaoM. M.ChenJ.RoismanG.HongY. (2007). Essentializing race: Implications for bicultural individuals’ cognition and affect. Psychological Science, 18, 341-348.
5.
ChaoM. M.OkazakiS.HongY. (2011). The quest for multicultural competence: Challenges and lessons learned from clinical and organizational research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 263-274.
6.
ChenG. M.StarostaW. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19, 353-383.
ChiuC-y.GelfandM.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482-493.
9.
ChiuC.-yHongY. (2005). Cultural competence: Dynamic processes. In ElliotA.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and competence (pp. 489-505). New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
ClarkH. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ClarkH. H.MarshallC. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In JoshiA. K.SagI.WebberB. (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ClarkH. H.MurphyG. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In NyJ.-F. J. L.KintschW. (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287–296). New York, NY: North Holland.
13.
ClarkH. H.SchreuderR.ButtrickS. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 245-2589.
14.
ClarkH. H.Wilkes-GibbsD. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
15.
CunninghamP. B.FosterS. L.HenggelerS. W. (2002). The elusive concept of cultural competence. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research and Practice, 5, 231-243.
16.
FlemingJ. H.DarleyJ. H.HiltonJ. L.KojetinB. A. (1990). Multiple audience problem: A strategic communication perspective on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 593-609.
17.
FuH.-y.ChiuC.-y.MorrisM. W.YoungM. (2007). Spontaneous inferences from cultural cues: Varying responses of cultural insiders and outsiders. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 58-75.
18.
FussellS. R.KraussR. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219.
19.
FussellS. R.KraussR. M. (1989b). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509-525.
20.
FussellS. R.KraussR. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about others’ knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
21.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS.LeeA. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326.
22.
HammerM. R.NishidaH.WisemanR. L. (1996). The influence of situational prototypes on dimensions of intercultural communication competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 267-282.
23.
HansenN. D.Pepitone-Arreola-RockwellF.GreeneA. F. (2000). Multicultural competence: Criteria and case examples. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 652-660.
24.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
25.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
26.
HigginsE. T.RoneyC. J. R.CroweE.HymesC. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self- regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
27.
HiltonD. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248-271.
28.
HintzmanD. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
29.
HongY.MorrisM.ChiuC.-y.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
30.
HowellW. C. (1973). Representation of frequency in memory. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 44-53.
31.
HuberG. P.LewisK. (2010). Cross-understanding: Implications for group cognition and performance. Academy of Management Review, 35, 6-26.
32.
IsaacsE. A.ClarkH. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
33.
KeesingR. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73–97.
34.
KimY. Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
35.
KraussR. M.ChiuC.-y. (1998). Language and social psychology. In GilbertD.Fiske-EmoryS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 41-88). New York, NY: Guilford.
36.
LalwaniA. K.ShrumL. J.ChiuC.-y. (2009). Motivated response style: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 870-882.
37.
LauI. Y.-M.ChiuC.-Y.LeeS.-L. (2001). Communication and shared reality: Implications for the psychological foundations of culture. Social Cognition, 19, 350-371.
38.
Lau-GeskL. G. (2003). Activating culture through persuasion appeals: An examination of the bicultural consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 301-315.
39.
LeungA. K.-y.ChiuC.-y. (2010). Multicultural experiences and intercultural communication. In LeungA. K.-y.ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y. (Eds.), Cultural processes. A social psychological perspective (pp. 242-262). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
42.
MorrisM. W.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
43.
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know—And sometimes misjudge—What others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737-759.
44.
NoS.HongY.LiaoH.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991-1004.
45.
OffermannL. R.PhanL. U. (2002). Culturally intelligent leadership for a diverse world. In RiggioR. E.MurphyS. E.PirozzoloF. J. (Eds.), Multiple intelligences and leadership (pp. 187-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
RossM.XunW. Q. E.WilsonA. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040-1050.
47.
ShteynbergG.GelfandM. J.KimK. (2009). Peering into the “magnum mysterium” of culture: The explanatory power of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 46-69.
48.
SpitzbergB. H. (1997). A model of intercultural communication competence. In SamovarL. A.PorterR. E. (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 379-391). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
49.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research. New York, NY: Springer.
50.
SueD. W.BinghamR. P.Porche-BurkeL.VasquezM. (1999). The diversification of psychology: A multicultural revolution. American Psychologist, 54, 1061-1069.
51.
SuiJ.ZhuY.ChiuC.-y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and recognition memory: Cultural priming effects on self- and mother-reference effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 818-824.
52.
WanC.ChiuC.-y.PengS.TamK.-p. (2007). Measuring cultures through intersubjective norms: Implications for predicting relative identification with two or more cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 213-226.
53.
WanC.ChiuC.-y.TamK.-p.LeeS.-l.LauI. Y.-m.PengS.-q. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 337-354.
54.
WisemanR. L.HammerM. R.NishidaH. (1989). Predictors of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 349-370.
55.
ZacksR. T.HasherL.SanftH. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: Further findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 106-116.
56.
ZouX.TamK.-p.MorrisM. W.LeeS.-l.LauY.-m.ChiuC.-y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus vs. personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579-597.
