The Motivation for Ethno-cultural Continuity (MEC) scale was developed to capture the agency of minority individuals in the long-term acculturation of their group and their dedication to cultural persistence over many generations. Study 1 presents the construction and validation of a pilot MEC scale, an 18-item unifactorial measure demonstrating good reliability (α = 0.95), convergent validity via its significant correlations with Collective Self-Esteem (r = 0.67), Perceived Collective Continuity (r = 0.54), Perceived Group Entitativity (r = 0.32), and discriminant validity in that it was unrelated to attitudes toward Assimilation (r = -.10, ns). Study 2 confirmed the structural equivalence of the final 10-item MEC scale and examined its prevalence and function across samples of New Zealand Jews, Māori, and Chinese (n = 311). Good scale reliability was found across cultures (α = 0.94 to 0.95). As expected, higher values were found among Jews and Māori than Chinese. Together with traditional ethnocentric predictors, MEC predicted intentions for endogamy and in turn selective dating for Jews and Māori, but not for Chinese. Results are interpreted in terms of existential uncertainty experienced by “small peoples” and the impact of collective interests on individual behavior.
AlbaR.D. (1990). Ethnic identity: The transformation of White America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
American Jewish Committee. (2005). Jewish geography. New York: Author.
3.
BarkerV.GilesH. (2004). English-only policies: Perceived support and social limitation. Language & Communication, 24, 77-95.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 1173-1182.
5.
BerryJ. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B.MarinG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BerryJ. W.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP. (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural transition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BerryJ. W.SamD. L. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In BerryJ. W.SegallM. H.KagitcibasiC. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol.3, pp. 291-326). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
BoskiP. (2008). Five meanings of integration in acculturation research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 142-153.
9.
BossardJ. H. S.Stoker BollE. (1972). When the children come in interfaith marriages. In BarronM. L. (Ed.), The blending American: Patterns of intermarriage (pp. 296-308). Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
10.
BrownL. M.NcNattP. S.CooperG. D. (2003). Ingroup romantic preferences among Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 335-354.
11.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
12.
CallisterP. (2004). Ethnicity measures, intermarriage and social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 23, 109-141.
13.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239-262.
14.
CastanoE.SacchiS.GriesP. H. (2003). The perception of the Other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political Psychology, 24(3), 449-468.
15.
ChirkovV. (2009). Summary of the criticism and of the potential ways to improve acculturation psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 177-180.
16.
CohenS. J. D. (1999). The beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, varieties, uncertainties. California: University of California Press.
17.
De la SablonnièreR.TougasF.Lortie-LussierM. (2009). Dramatic social change in Russia and Mongolia: Connecting relative deprivation to social identity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 327-348.
18.
DurieM. (1998). Te mana, te kāwanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
19.
DurieM. (2005). Ngā tai matatū: Tides of Māori endurance. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
20.
FitzgeraldC. P. (1967). The Chinese view of their place in the world. London: Oxford University Press.
21.
FontaineJ. (2005). Equivalence. In Kempf-LeonardK. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (1) (pp. 803-813). London: Academic Press.
22.
GezentsveyM. A.WardC. (2008). Unveiling agency: A motivational perspective on acculturation and adaptation. In SorrentinoR.YamaguchiS. (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and motivation within and across cultures (pp. 213-236). New York: Elsevier.
GilesH.BourhisR. Y.TaylorD. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In GilesH. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307-348). London: Academic Press.
25.
HarwoodJ.GilesH.BourhisR. Y. (1994). The genesis of vitality theory: Historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 108, 167-206.
26.
HowardS.DidhamR. (2005). Ethnic intermarriage and ethnic transference amongst the Māori population: Implications for the measurement and definition of ethnicity. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
27.
HuijnkW.VerkuytenM.CoendersM. (2008). The influence of family solidarity on the resistance towards interethnic marriages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA.
28.
KalmijnM. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395-422.
29.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
KvernmoS. (2006). Indigenous peoples. In SamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 233-250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LalondeR. N.HynieM.PannuM.TatlaS. (2004). The role of culture in interpersonal relationships: Do second generation South Asian Canadians want a traditional partner?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(5), 503-524.
33.
LamyM. G.LiuJ. H.WardC. (2011). Integrating paradigms, methodological implications: Using history to embody Breakwell’s theoretical links between Social Identity Theory and Social Representations Theory. Papers on Social Representations, 20, 15.1-15.7
34.
LeVineR. A.CampbellD. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: Wiley.
35.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
36.
LiuJ. H.CampbellS. M.CondieH. (1995). Ethnocentrism in dating preferences for an American sample: The ingroup bias in social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 95-115.
37.
LiuJ. H.McCreanorT.McIntoshT.TeaiwaT.(Eds.). (2005). New Zealand identities: Departures and destinations. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
38.
LiuJ. H.WilsonM. S.McClureJ.HigginsT. R. (1999). Social identity and the perception of history: Cultural representations of Aotearoa/New Zealand. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1021-1047.
39.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
40.
MaimonD. (2007). Alternative futures project summary document JP2030 Version6(2). Jerusalem: JPPPI Jewish People Policy Planning Institute.
41.
MokT. A. (1999). Asian American dating: Important factors in partner choice. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 5(2), 103-117.
42.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889-922.
43.
NgJ. (1995). Windows on a Chinese past. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago Heritage Books.
44.
OsbeckL. M.MoghaddamF. M.PerreaultS. (1997). Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 113-123.
45.
PhinneyJ. S.HorenczykG.LiebkindK.VedderP. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493-510.
46.
RiechW. A.RamosJ. M.JaipalR. (2000). Ethnic identity and interethnic dating in Portuguese young adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 151-161.
47.
RudminF. W. (2010). Steps towards the renovation of acculturation research paradigms: What scientists’ personal experiences of migration might tell science. Culture and Psychology, 16(3), 299-312.
48.
SachdevI. (1995). Language and identity: Ethnolinguistic vitality of Aboriginal peoples in Canada. London Journal of Canadian Studies, 11, 41-59.
49.
SaniF.BoweM. (2004). Perceived group historical continuity: Its functions and its relationship with group identification. Paper presented at the “Collective Remembering, Collective Emotions and Shared Representations of History: Functions and Dynamics,” small meeting of EAESP, Aix-en-Provence, France.
50.
SchönpflugU. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 174-185.
51.
SearleW.WardC. (1990). The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 449-464.
52.
SpicerE. H. (1971). Persistent cultural systems. Science, November, 795-800.
SteinA. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 143-172.
55.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
TajfelH. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
VerkuytenM.Aslan YildizA. (2007). National (dis) idenfitication and ethnic and religious identity: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1448-1462.
59.
VerkuytenM. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. New York: Psychology Press.
60.
WardC. (2008). Thinking outside the Berry boxes: New perspectives on identity, acculturation and intercultural relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 114-123.
61.
WeinreichP. (2009). “Enculturation,” not “acculturation”: Conceptualising and assessing identity processes in migrant communities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 124-139.
62.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
