Prior research has shown that Japanese blame organizational leaders more harshly than Americans: Americans blame organizational leaders based on the behavior of individual leaders, whereas Japanese blame leaders based both on the behavior of individual leaders and that of the organization. This finding can be explained by a cultural difference in cognitive orientation to focus on the causal influence of groups but also by a cultural difference in value to subordinate individual goals to group goals. By asking Japanese and American respondents to make credit judgments for positive organizational incidents, the current work tests these two rival explanations. Results support the view that group-based crediting occurs because of perceivers’ cognitive orientation to perceive group causality. Implications of this cultural difference and the judgmental processes are discussed.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
ChaoM. M.ZhangZ.- X.ChiuC.- Y. (2008). Personal and collective culpability judgment: A functional analysis of East Asian-North American differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 730-744.
3.
ChoiI.DalalR.Kim-PrietoC.ParkH. (2003). Culture and judgement of causal relevance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(1), 46-59.
4.
CoffeeJ. C. J. (1981). “No soul to damn: No body to kick”: An unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment. Michigan Law Review, 79, 386-459.
5.
HamiltonV. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316-328.
6.
HamiltonV. L.SandersJ. (with HosoiY.IshimuraZ.MatsubaraN.NishimuraH.TomitaN.TokoroK.). (1983). Universals in judging wrongdoing: Japanese and Americans compared. American Sociological Review, 48, 199-211.
7.
HoD. Y.- F.ChiuC.- Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KâgitçibasiÇ.ChoiS.- C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 137-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
ItakuraH. (1975). Kigyo hanzai no riron to genjitsu [The theory and the reality of the corporate crime]. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
10.
LickelB.MillerN.StenstromD. M.DensonT. F.SchmaderT. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372-390.
11.
MeindlJ. R.EhrlichS. B.DukerichJ. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102.
12.
MenonT.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.HongY. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attributions to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.
13.
MorrisM. W.MenonT.AmesD. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169-192.
14.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
15.
SandersJ.HamiltonV. L. (with DenisovskyG.KatoN.KawaiM.KozyrevaP.KuboT.MatskovskyM.NishimuraH.TokoroK.). (1996). Distributing responsibility for wrongdoing inside corporate hierarchies: Public judgments in three societies. Law and Social Inquiry, 21, 815-855.
16.
ShawM. E.IwawakiS. (1972). Attribution of responsibility by Japanese and Americans as a function of age. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 71-81.
17.
ShultzT. R.JaggiC.SchleiferM. (1987). Assigning vicarious responsibility. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 377-380.
18.
TakanoY.OsakaE. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341.
19.
TriandisH. C.BontempoR.VillarealM. J.AsaiM.LuccaN. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
20.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
21.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.OkumuraT.BrettJ. M.MooreD. A.TenbrunselA. E.BazermanM. H. (2002). Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 87-95.
22.
YamaguchiS. (2001). Culture and control orientations. In MatsumotoD. (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 223-243). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
YbarraO. (2002). Naive causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 421-441.
24.
ZembaY.YoungM. J.MorrisM. W. (2006). Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 36-51.
25.
ZembaY. (2006). Responses to organizational harm: Mechanism of blaming managers as proxies for a culpable organization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 184-194.
