Little is known about the causes of cross-cultural specifics of numerical development. The authors examined effects of inversion (a linguistic effect) on three different numerical tasks in 220 second graders from France, Wallonia, Flanders, Germany, and Austria tested for the standardization of the dyscalculia test TEDI-MATH. Results revealed that performance differences between countries are only partly attributable to language effects, but group differences in recognition of unit- and decade-digits and subtraction are more likely due to curricular effects. As expected, language effects due to the inversion principle could be observed in writing Arabic numbers to dictation affecting performance both specifically as well as in a generalized way being present in different error types. These results clearly show that numerical skills do not develop in a unitary fashion and that cross-cultural differences can be due to several factors.
Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., Perruchet, P., & Seron, X. ( 2004). ADAPT: A developmental, asemantic, and procedural model for transcoding from verbal to arabic numerals. Psychological Review, 111, 368-394.
2.
Comrie, B. ( 2005). Endangered numeral systems. In J. Wohlgemuth & T. Dirksmeyer (Eds.), Bedrohte vielfalt: Aspekte des sprach(en)tods [Endangered diversity: Aspects of language death] (pp. 203-230). Berlin: Weißensee Verlag.
3.
Dehaene, S. ( 1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Dowker, A. ( 2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 38, 324-332.
5.
Dowker, A., Bala, S., & Lloyd, D. ( 2008). Linguistic influences on mathematical development: How important is the transparency of the counting system? Philosophical Psychology, 21, 523-538.
6.
Fuson, K.C., & Kwon, Y. ( 1991). Chinese-based regular and European irregular systems of number words: The disadvantages for English-speaking children. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education: Research and practice (pp. 211-226). Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
7.
Geary, D.C., Bow Thomas, C.C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R.S. ( 1996). Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Development, 67, 2022-2044.
8.
Grégoire, J., Noël, M., & Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2004). TEDI-MATH [Flemish adaptation: A. Desoete]. Antwerpen, Belgium: TEMA, Brussel/Harcourt.
9.
Helmreich, I., Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.C., & Moeller, K. (this issue). Language effects on the mental number line: Comparing Italian- and German-speaking children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology .
10.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1996). Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS III). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center Boston College.
11.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2007). Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS 2007). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center Boston College.
12.
Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.C., Graf, M., Krinzinger, H., Delazer, M., & Willmes, K. ( 2009). TEDI-MATH - Test zur Erfassung numerisch-rechnerischer fertigkeiten vom kindergarten bis zur 3. Klasse English translation: TEDI-MATH. A Test for Numerical and Calculation Abilities from Kindergarten to Third Grade. Bern, Germany: Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG.
13.
Kohr, R.L., & Games, P.A. ( 1977). Testing complex a priori contrasts on means from independent samples. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 207-216.
14.
Miller, K.F., Smith, C.M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, H. ( 1995). Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6, 56-60.
15.
Miura, I.T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C.C., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. ( 1993). First graders’ cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value: Cross-national comparisons-France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 24-30.
16.
Muldoon, K., Simms, V., Towse, J., Burns, V., & Yue, G. (this issue). Comparing Chinese with Scottish children’s performance on estimation and other number tasks age 5. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
17.
Seron, X., & Fayol, M. ( 1994). Number transcoding in children: A functional analysis . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 281-300.
18.
Siegler, R.S., & Opfer, J.E. ( 2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243.
19.
Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. ( 2009). Predicting arithmetic abilities: The role of preparatory arithmetic markers and intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 237-251.
20.
Van Nieuwenhoven, C., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M.P. (2001). TEDI-MATH. Test Diagnostique des Compétences de Base en Mathématiques English translation: TEDI-MATH: Diagnostic Test for Basic Competencies in Mathematics. Paris: Editions Centre de Psychologie Appliquée à Paris.
21.
Westermann, R., & Hager, W. ( 1986). Error probabilities in educational and psychological research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 117-146.
22.
Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.C. ( 2009). On the language specificity of basic number processing: Transcoding in a language with inversion and its relation to working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 60-77.
