Numbers often bias adults’ spatial performance. Because the direction of this bias (left-to-right versus right-to-left) is culture-specific, it has been assumed that spatial-numeric associations develop with reading practice or schooling. The authors tested this assumption by examining spatial-numeric associations in pre-reading preschoolers. Preschoolers were shown two boxes (sample and matching boxes) subdivided into seven verbally numbered “rooms” (e.g., “the four room”). A “winner” card was revealed in the sample box, and children searched for the “winner” in the matching box (located in the same-numbered room). Preschoolers were faster and more accurate when rooms increased numerically from left-to-right versus right-to-left. This advantage was apparently caused by numbers influencing preschoolers’ encoding of spatial locations: Ordering of numbers in the sample box affected preschoolers’ search greatly, whereas ordering of numbers in the matching box did not. The authors conclude that numeric effects on spatial encoding develop far too early to be caused by reading practice or schooling.
Ansari, D., & Dhital, B. ( 2006). Age-related changes in the activation of the Intraparietal Sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 18, 1820-1828.
2.
Ansari, D., Nicolas, G., Lucas, E., Hamon, K., & Dhital, B. ( 2005). Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults. Brain Imaging, 16, 1769-1773.
3.
Barnett, S.M., & Ceci, S.J. ( 2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612-637.
4.
Berch, D.B., Foley, E.J., Hill, R.J., & Ryan, P.M. ( 1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308.
5.
Boroditsky, L. ( 2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
6.
Boroditsky, L. ( 2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
7.
Callabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. ( 2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: A methodology. Neuropsychologia, 43, 779-783.
8.
Cantlon, J.F., Brannon, E.M., Carter, E.J., & Pelphrey, K.A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4, 844-854.
9.
Chatterjee, A., Maher, L.M., & Heilman, K.M. ( 1995). Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation . Neuropsychologia, 33, 643-648.
10.
Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M.H., & Basilico, D. ( 1999). Verbs, events and spatial representations, Neuropsychologia, 37, 395-402.
11.
Chen, J.Y. ( 2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104, 427-436.
12.
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J., Ollinger, J., McAvoy, M., & Shulman, G. ( 2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292-297.
13.
Dehaene, S. ( 2007). Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: Elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, XXII of attention and performance (pp. 527-574). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. ( 1993). The mental representation of parity and numerical magnitude . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
15.
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. ( 2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217-1220.
16.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. ( 2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
17.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. ( 1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
18.
de Hevia, M.D., Girelli, L., & Vallar, G. ( 2006). Numbers and space: A cognitive illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 254-264.
19.
DeLoache, J.S. ( 1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238, 1556-1557.
20.
Fias, W., Lammertyn, J., Reynvoet, B., Dupont, P., & Orban, G.A. ( 2003). Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude . Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 47-56.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. ( 1998). Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 389-398.
30.
Knops, A., Viarouge, A., & Dehaene, S. ( 2009). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 803-821.
31.
Landau, B. ( 1996). Multiple geometric representations of objects in languages and language learners. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel , & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 317-363). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Lee, K. ( 2000). Cortical areas differentially involved in multiplication and subtraction: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study and correlation with a case of selective acalculia. Annals of Neurology, 48, 657-661.
33.
Li, P., & Gleitman, L. ( 2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning, Cognition, 83, 265-294.
34.
Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. ( 2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 315-353.
35.
Longo, M.R., & Lourenco, S.F. (2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1400-1407.
36.
Maas, A., & Russo, A. ( 2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296-301.
37.
McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1324-1333.
Opfer, J.E., & Thompson, C.A. (2008). The trouble with transfer: Insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude . Child Development, 79, 788-804.
40.
Opfer, J.E., Thompson, C.A., & Furlong, E.E. ( 2010). Early development of spatial-numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13, 761-771.
41.
Penner-Wilger, M., Fast, L., Lefevre, J.A., Smith-Chant, B.L., Skwarchuk, S.L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. ( 2007). The foundations of numeracy: Subitizing, finger gnosia, and fine motor ability. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1385-1390). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
42.
Penner-Wilger, M., Fast, L., Lefevre, J.A., Smith-Chant, B.L., Skwarchuk, S.L., Kamawar, D., Bisanz, J., & Deslauriers, W.A. (2008). Investigating the building blocks of numerical representations: Subitizing and finger gnosis. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1379). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
43.
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., & Price, C. ( 2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? Neuroimage, 15, 435-446.
44.
Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., & LeBihan, D. ( 2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. NeuroImage, 14, 1013-1026.
45.
Pinel, P., Piazza, M., LeBihan, D., & Dehaene, S. ( 2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41, 983-993.
Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Ota, H., Michel, C., & Boisson, D. ( 2004). Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychological Science, 15, 426-430.
48.
Shaki, S., Fischer, M.H., & Petrusic, W.M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328-331.
49.
Siegler, R.S. ( 2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464-510). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
50.
Siegler, R.S., & Opfer, J.E. ( 2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243.
51.
Simon, O., Cohen, L., Mangin, J., Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. ( 2002). Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation and language related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33, 475-487.
52.
Singley, K., & Anderson, J.R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. ( 2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line . Nature, 417(6885), 138-139.
