The mental number line of children is usually assumed to be language-independent; however, this independency has not yet been studied. In this cross-cultural study, we examined the influence of language properties on a nonverbal version of the number line task in Italian- and German-speaking first graders. The essential difference between the two languages concerns the inversion property of most German multi-digit numbers (e.g., 48 → “eight-and-forty”), whereas in Italian number-words no inversion is found. The analyses revealed two language-specific differences in the number line task: (a) Generally, the estimates of Italian children were more accurate than those of Austrian children, even when controlling for general cognitive abilities. (b) Italian children performed particularly better when inversion errors led to large estimation errors. In conclusion, these findings indicate that the organization of children’s mental number line is indeed influenced by language properties even in nonverbal settings.
Barth, H.C., & Paladino, A.M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational change. Developmental Science. 14, 125-135.
Brannon, E.M., Wusthoff, C.J., Gallistel, C.R., & Gibbon, J. ( 2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12, 238-243.
4.
Brysbaert, M., Fias, W., & Noël, M.P. (1998). The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: Is "twentyfour" processed in the same way as "four-and-twenty "? Cognition, 66, 51-77.
5.
Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. ( 2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1831-1840.
6.
Catell, R.B., Weiss, R.H., & Osterland, J. ( 1997). Culture Fair Test 1. Göttingen , Germany: Hogrefe.
7.
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. ( 2000). Calculating without reading: Unsuspected residual abilities in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 563-583.
8.
Comrie, B. ( 2005). Endangered numeral systems. In J. Wohlgemuth & T. Dirksmeyer (Eds.), Bedrohte vielfalt: Aspekte des sprach(en)tods [Endangered diversity: Aspects of language death] (pp. 203-230). Berlin: Weißensee Verlag.
9.
Comrie, B. ( 2006), June. Numbers, language, and culture. Paper presented at the NUMBRA Summerschool on Numeracy, Reading, Dyslexia and Dyscalculia: Brain Development, Culture and Remediation, Jyväskylä, Finland.
10.
Dehaene, S. ( 2001). Précis of the number sense. Mind & Language, 16, 16-36.
11.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. ( 1993). The mental representation of parity and numerical magnitude . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
12.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. ( 2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
13.
Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5- to 9-year old children: Evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 1-17.
14.
Hoeckner, S.H., Moeller, K., Zauner, H., Wood, G., Haider, C., & Gassner, A. ( 2008). Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect. Cortex, 44, 429-438.
15.
Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S.E., Wood, G., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., Zimmerhackl, L.- B., & Koten, J.W. (2008). A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex, 44, 376-385.
16.
Krinzinger, H., et al. (this issue). Effects of language, curricula, and gender equality on numerical skills in second grade. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
17.
Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F., & Woltz, D.J. ( 1984). Componential modelling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology , 76, 1325-1345.
18.
Miura, I.T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C.C., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. ( 1993). First graders’ cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value: Cross-national comparisons-France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 24-30.
19.
Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.C. ( 2009). Children’s early mental number line: Logarithmic or decomposed linear?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 103, 503-515.
20.
Muldoon, K., Simms, V., Towse, J., Burns, V., & Yue, G. (this issue). Comparing Chinese and Scottish children’s performance on estimation and other number tasks age 5. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
21.
Nuerk, H.- C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. ( 2005). Language effects in magnitude comparison: Small, but not irrelevant. Brain and Language, 92, 262-277.
22.
Opfer, J., & Furlong, E.E. (this issue). How numbers bias preschoolers spatial search. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Shaki, S., Fischer, M.H., & Petrusic, W.M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Reviews, 16, 328-331.
25.
Thompson, C.A., & Opfer, J. ( 2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development, 81, 1768-1786.
26.
van Galen, M.S., & Reitsma, P. ( 2008). Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 99-113.
27.
Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.- C., & Fischer, M. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 59, 489-525.
28.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138-139.
29.
Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.- C. (2009). Transcoding in a language with inversion and its relation to working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 60-77.
