In Western societies women prefer relatively taller men as potential partners, whereas men prefer women to be slightly shorter than them. Here we report data on relative height preferences in a traditional ethnic group, i.e. the Himba, in which men and women do not show such a strong preference. Thus our data challenges the view of a universal preference for taller men, by suggesting that height preferences may be influenced by environmental and ecological conditions.
AntoszewskaA.WolanskiN. (1992). Sexual dimorphism in newborns and adults. Studies in Human Ecology, 10, 23-38.
2.
BeardA. S.BlaserM. J. (2002). The ecology of height. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 45, 475-498.
3.
CameronC.OskampS.SparksW. (1977). Courtship American style: Newspaper ads. The Family Coordinator, 26, 27-30.
4.
FinkB.NeaveN.BrewerG.PawlowskiB. (2007). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS): Further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2249-2257.
5.
GrayJ. P.WolfeL. D. (1980). Height and sexual dimorphism of stature among human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53, 441-456.
6.
GrazianoW. G.BrothenT.BerscheidE. (1978). Height and attraction: Do men see women eye to eye?Journal of Personality, 46, 128-145.
7.
LynnM.ShurgotB. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349-357.
8.
MalanJ. S. (2004). Peoples of Namibia. Windhouk: Rhino Publishers.
9.
PierceC. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143-149.
10.
PawlowskiB. (2003). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 709-712.
11.
PawlowskiB.DunbarR. I. M.LipowiczA. (2000). Evolutionary fitness: Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.
12.
PawlowskiB.KozielS. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139-149.
13.
SalskaI.FrederickD. A.PawlowskiB.ReillyA. H.LairdK. T.RuddN. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 203-215.
14.
SearR.MarloweF. W. (2009). How universal are human mate choices? Size doesn’t matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biology Letters, 5, 606-609.
15.
ShepperdJ.StrathmanA. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617-627.
16.
SwamiV.FurnhamA.BalakumarN.WilliamsC.CanawayK.StanistreetD. (2008). Factors influencing preferences for height: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 395-400.
