This study proposes a new control strategy, control via self-improvement, in addition to primary and secondary control. This strategy is aimed at an actual external change (primary target), whereas the means to reach the goal is self-improvement (secondary target—the self). A study conducted in Israel and in Hong Kong indicated that the strategy of control via self-improvement exists in the achievement domain and is more prevalent in Hong Kong than in Israel.
ChanH.WanL. C.SinL. Y. M. (2009). The contrasting effects of culture on consumer tolerance: Interpersonal face and impersonal fate. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 292-304.
2.
CheungF. M.LeungK.FanR. M.SongW.ZhangJ. X.ZhangJ. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181-199.
3.
FungH. H.NgS. K. (2006). Age differences in the sixth personality factor: Age differences in interpersonal relatedness among Canadians and Hong Kong Chinese. Psychology and Aging, 21, 810-814.
4.
HeckhausenJ.SchulzR. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284-304.
5.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.
6.
HuiV. K.- Y.BondM. H. (2009). Target’s face loss, motivations, and forgiveness following relational transgression: Comparing Chinese and U.S. culture. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 123-140.
7.
HwangK. K. (2006). Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 276-281.
8.
KurmanJ.DanO. (2007). Unpackaging cross-cultural differences in initiative between Israeli sub-groups: Tradition and control orientations as mediating factors. Journal of Cross-Culture Psychology, 38, 581-595.
9.
KurmanJ.Yoshihara-TanakaC.ElkoshiT. (2003). Is self-enhancement negatively related to constructive self-criticism?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 24-37.
10.
MorlingB.EveredS. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 269-296.
11.
MorrisM. W.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
12.
PetersonC.SemmelA.von BaeyerC.AbramsonL. Y.MetalskyG. I.SeligmanM. E. P. (1982). The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-300.
13.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ. R.SnyderS. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
14.
SeginerR.HalabiH. (1991). Cross-cultural variations of adolescents’ future orientation: The case of Israeli Druze versus Israeli Arab and Jewish males. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 224-237.
15.
SkinnerE. A. (2007). Secondary control critiqued: Is it secondary? Is it control? Comment on Morling and Evered (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 133, 911-916.
16.
TrommsdorffG.EssauC. A. (1998). Japanese and German adolescents’ control orientation: A cross-cultural study. In TrommsdorffG.FriedlmeierW.KornadtH.- J. (Eds.), Japan in transition (pp. 198-211). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
17.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
YamaguchiS. (2001). Culture and control orientations. In MatsumotoD. (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 223-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
YamaguchiS.GelfandM.OhashiM. M.ZembaY. (2005). The cultural psychology of control: Illusions of personal versus collective control in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 750-761.
