The Japanese term amae , referring to a need to receive affection, is compared to a Midland English dialect word, mardy, meaning soft or spoilt. An interpretative phenomenological analysis conducted within the framework of the componential model of emotion indicates areas of overlap and divergence between these two terms that reflect the attitudes toward dependence within the two cultural contexts. Antecedents are similar, as are some of the elements of subjective experience and emotional expression. Both are more or less appropriate in similar relationships. However, mardiness is less acceptable than amae: The former may be universal, but it is considered childish and therefore unacceptable; the latter may be childish, but it is considered human and is more often treated sympathetically.
Averill, J.R. ( 1985) The social construction of emotion: With special reference to love. In K. J. Gergen & K. E. Davis (Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp. 89-109). New York: Springer .
2.
Behrens, K.Y. ( 2004). A multifaceted view of the concept of amae: Reconsidering the indigenous Japanese concept of relatedness. Human Development , 47, 1-27.
3.
Brislin, R.W. ( 1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2, methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Doi, T. ( 1966). Japanese psychology, dependency need, and mental health . In W. Caudill & T. Lin (Eds.), Mental health research in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 335-341). Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
5.
Doi, T. ( 1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.
6.
Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. ( 1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
7.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
8.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R.L. ( 1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Kashima, Y., & Callan, V.J. ( 1994). The Japanese work group. In H.C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. House (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., pp. 609-646). Washington, DC: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10.
Kumagai, H.A. ( 1981). A dissection of intimacy: A study of "bipolar posturing" in Japanese social interaction- Amaeru and amayakasu, indulgence and deference . Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 5, 249-272.
11.
Kumagai, H.A., & Kumagai, A.K. ( 1986). The hidden "I" in amae: "Passive love" and Japanese social perception. Ethos, 14, 305-320.
12.
Levenson, H. ( 1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-83). New York: Academic.
13.
Lewis, J.R. ( 1994). Patient views on quality care in general practice: Literature review. Social Science and Medicine, 39, 655-670.
14.
Lewis, J.R., & Williamson, V. (1995). Examining patient perceptions of quality care in general practice: Comparison of quantitative and qualitative methods. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 249-253.
15.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. ( 1991). Culture and the self. Psychological Review , 98, 224-253.
16.
Mesquita, B., Frijda, N.H., & Scherer, K.R. ( 1997). Culture and emotion: Theoretical and methodological issues . In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitçibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 255-298). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Morsbach, H., & Tyler, W.J. ( 1986). A Japanese emotion: Amae. In R. Harre (Ed.), The social construction of emotion (pp. 289-307). Oxford, UK: BAsil Blackwell.
18.
Noon, J.M., & Lewis, J.R. ( 1992). Therapeutic strategies and outcomes: Perspectives from different cultures. British Journal of Medical Psychology , 65, 107-117.
19.
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. ( 1984). Illness and culture in contemporary Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Opie, I., & Opie, P. ( 1977). The lore and language of schoolchildren. St. Albans: Granada. (Original work published 1959)
21.
Oxford English Dictionary. (2008). http://dictionary.oed.com
22.
Smith, J.A. ( 1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271.
23.
Smith, J.A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. ( 1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage.
24.
Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. ( 2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage.
25.
Speller, G., Lyons, E., & Twigger-Ross, C. (2002). A community in transition: The relationship between spatial change and identity processes. Social Psychological Review, 4(2), 39-58.
26.
Taketomo, Y. ( 1986). Amae as a metalanguage: A critique of Doi’s theory of Amae. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis , 14, 525-544.
27.
Whitburn, V. (Editor). (2004, January 4). The Archers [Radio Series]. London: British Broadcasting Company.
28.
Yamaguchi, S. ( 2002). Cultural psychology and indigenous psychology: Are they foes or allies? Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 36(2-3), 3-13.
29.
Yamaguchi, S., & Ariizumi, Y. ( 2006). Close interpersonal relationships among Japanese: Amae as distinguished from attachment. In U. Kim, K. Yang, & K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 163-174). New York: Springer.
