In this article, the authors posit that dispositional learning orientation and self-set goal level are two critical motivational antecedents to cross-cultural adjustment. They collected longitudinal field data from 117 sojourning international undergraduate students. Regression results indicate that self-set academic and socialinteraction goal levels are positively related to academic and social adjustment, respectively. A dispositional learning orientation is positively related to academic and social adjustment but the relationship is mediated by the self-set goal level. They discuss contributions to and implications for cross-cultural adjustment research.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Black, J. S. (1988). Work role transitions: A study of American expatriate managers in Japan. Journal of International Business Studies,19, 277-294.
3.
Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). The other half of the picture: Antecedents of spouse cross-cultural adjustment. Journal of International Business Studies,22, 461-478.
4.
Brislin, R. W. (1981). Cross-cultural encounters: Face-to-face interaction. New York: Pergamon.
5.
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67, 26-48.
6.
Church, A. T. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 540-572.
7.
Dalton, M., & Wilson, M. (2000). Relationship of the five-factor model of personality to job performance for a group of Middle Eastern expatriate managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,31, 250-258.
8.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review,95, 256-273.
9.
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Gong, Y. (2003). Goal orientations and cross-cultural adjustment: An exploratory study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,27, 297-305.
11.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 541-553.
12.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
14.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies,19, 411-432.
15.
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement,57, 995-1015.
17.
Vandewalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology,86, 629-640.
18.
Ward, C. (1996). Acculturation. In D. Landis & R. S. Bhagat (Eds.),Handbook of intercultural training(2nd ed., pp. 124-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
