In this study, Trinidadian (n = 194) and U.S. (n = 290) citizens were compared on their attitudes toward domestic violence (DV) as well as their willingness to intervene in five distinct DV contexts (when the DV involved an immediate family member, extended family member, a friend, neighbor, and a coworker). The results indicated that Trinidadians were modestly, albeit statistically significantly, more tolerant of DV compared to U.S. citizens—a finding that was accounted for primarily by age differences between the two national groups. Also, Trinidadians reported being significantly less willing to intervene in DV involving a friend, neighbor, and coworker than U.S. citizens, even after controlling for differences in sociodemographic variables. Regarding gender, women expressed significantly less tolerance for DV than men across nationality. Diverse interpretations of these findings are discussed in the context of culture.
Anderson, K. B., Cooper, H., & Okamura, L. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape. A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 293-315.
2.
Arias, I., & Beach, S. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 139-149.
3.
Arscott-Mills, S. (2001). Intimate partner violence in Jamaica: A descriptive study of women who access the services of the women’s crisis centre in Kingston. Violence Against Women, 7, 1284-1302.
4.
Bailey, W., LeFranc, E., & Branche, C. (1998). Partnering and violence. Caribbean Dialogue, 4, 1-10.
5.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
7.
Barbee, A. P., Cunningham, M. R., Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., Gulley, M. R., Yankeelov, P. A., et al. (1993). Effects of gender role expectations on the social support process. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 175-190.
8.
Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Bibb, A., & Casimir, G. J. (1996). Haitian families. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & J. K. Pearce (Eds.), Ethnicity & family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 97-111). New York: Guilford.
10.
Bissessar, A. M. (2000). Policy transfer and implementation failure: A review of the policy of domestic violence in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Journal of Criminology & Social Psychology, 5, 57-80.
11.
Briere, J. (1987). Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering: Attitudes and childhood experiences. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 61-69.
12.
Brislin, R. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
13.
Buvinic, M., Morrison, A., & Shifter, M. (1999). Violence in Latin America and the Caribbean: A framework for action. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
14.
Carlson, B. E. (1996). Dating violence: Student beliefs about consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 3-17.
15.
Cozby, P. C. (2003). Methods in behavioral research (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
16.
Danns, G. K., & Persad, B. S. (1989, May). Domestic violence and the Caribbean family: A comparative analysis of conjugal violence within East Indian and Black households in Guyana. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Caribbean Studies Association, St. Michael’s, Barbados.
17.
Davis, R. C., & Brickman, E. (1996). Supportive and unsupportive aspects of behavior of others toward victims of sexual and nonsexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 250-262.
18.
Dean, A., & Voss, D. (1999). Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Diamond, J. (1992). The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal. New York: HarperCollins.
21.
Ellison, C. G., & Andersen, K. L. (2001). Religious involvement and domestic violence among U.S. couples. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 269-287.
22.
Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Anderson, K. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87-113.
23.
Falchikov, N. (1996). Adolescent attitudes to abuse of women: Are wives and nonmarital partners viewed differently?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 391-409.
24.
Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2004). The influence of gender and ethnicity on judgments of culpability in a domestic violence scenario. Violence and Victims, 19, 203-220.
25.
Funder, D. C. (1997). The personality puzzle. New York: Norton.
26.
Garcia-Moreno, C. (2000). Violence against women: International perspectives. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 330-333.
27.
Gelles, R. J. (1993). Through a sociological lens. Social structure and family violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 31-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Gopaul, R., & Morgan, P. (1997, March). Spousal violence: Spiraling patterns in Trinidad and Tobago. Paper presented at the Gender and Family in the Caribbean Conference, University of the West Indies, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.
29.
Jacob-Timm, S. (2000). School psychology in the new millennium: Legal influences and ethical issues. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 39-48.
30.
Jasinski, J. L., & Kaufman Kantor, G. (1997). Ethnic adaptations to occupational strain: Work related stress, drinking, and wife assault among Anglo and Hispanic husbands. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 814-831.
31.
Johnson, B. D., Gorbatenko, K. G., & Altmaier, E. M. (1994). Ethical issues for psychologists in hospital-based research and practice. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 3, 199-207.
32.
Klein, E., Campbell, J., Soler, E., & Ghez, M. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions/Halting the epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Locke, L., & Richman, C. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40, 227-247.
34.
Mahlstedt, D., & Keeny, L. (1993). Female survivors of dating violence and their social networks. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 319-333.
35.
Malley, P. B., & Reilly, E. P. (1999). Legal and ethical dimensions for mental health professionals. Philadelphia: Accelerated Development.
36.
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2004). Culture and psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
Monahan, J. (Ed.) (1980). Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
Nabi, R. L., Southwell, B., & Hornik, R. (2002). Predicting intentions versus predicting behaviors: Domestic violence prevention from a theory of reasoned action perspective. Health Communication, 14, 429-449.
39.
Nayak, M. B., Byrne, C. A., Martin, M. K., & Abraham, A. G. (2003). Attitudes toward violence against women: A cross-nation study. Sex Roles, 49, 333-342.
40.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Rawlins, J. (2000). Domestic violence in Trinidad: A family and public health problem. Caribbean Journal of Criminology and Social Psychology, 5, 165-180.
42.
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short-forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
43.
Robinson, T. S. (2000). Fictions of citizenship, bodies without sex: The production and effacement of gender in law. Small Axe, 7, 1-27.
44.
Schuller, R. A., & Vidmar, N. (1992). Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom: A review of literature. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 273-291.
45.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
Stone-Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2004). Inference problems with hierarchical multiple regression-based tests of mediating effects. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 23, 249-290.
47.
Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.
48.
Vogel, L. C. M., & Marshall, L. L. (2001). PTSD symptoms and partner abuse: Low income women at risk. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 569-584.
49.
Wandrei, M. L., & West, A. (2002). Intimate partner violence: A model for predicting interventions by informal helpers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 972-986.
50.
Williams, E. (1978). From Columbus to Castro: The history of the Caribbean 1492-1969. Thetford, UK: Andre Deutsch.
51.
Wolfgang, M., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Toward an integrated theory on criminology. London: Tavistock.
52.
World Health Organization. (1997). Violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
