Two studies examine differences between Ecuadorians and Euro-Americans in levels of reverence for their mothers. Data collected from college students in Ecuador and the United States show that Ecuadorians display higher levels of mother reverence than Euro-Americans. Ecuadorians also score higher on measures of maternal power, similarity of mothers to the cultural ideal of women, and uncertainty avoidance. However, levels of independence are significantly higher in the Euro-American sample than in the Ecuadorian sample. High levels of maternal power, idealization of mothers, and interdependent self-construals are found to predict mother reverence in both cultures. The implications of these findings for interpersonal and intercultural relations are discussed.
Albert, R. D. (1996). A framework for understanding Latin American and Latino/Latino cultural patterns Handbook of intercultural training. London: Sage.
2.
The American Century Dictionary. (1995). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Cubitt, T. (1995). Latin American society. Essex, United Kingdom: Longman Scientific and Technical.
4.
Demo, D. H., Allen, K. R., & Fine, M. A. (2000). Handbook of family diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Escovar, P. L., & Lazarus, P. J. (1982). Cross-cultural child-rearing practices: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology Intercultural, 3(3), 143-148.
6.
Fiske, S. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice. In S. Oscamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Fonseca, C. (2001). Philanderers, cuckolds, and wily women: A reexamination of gender relations in a Brazilian working-class neighborhood [Special issue]. Men & Masculinities, 3(3), 261-277.
8.
Garcia, W. (1996). Respeto: A Mexican base for interpersonal relationships. In S. Ting Tooney (Ed.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 137-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Gil, R. M., & Vazquez, C. I. (1996). The Maria paradox: How Latinas can merge old world traditions with new world self-esteem. New York: Berkley.
10.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
11.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. S., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
12.
Hamilton, S. (1998). The two-headed household: gender and rural development in the Ecuadorian Andes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13.
Harwood, R.L. & Miller, J.G. (1991). Perceptions of attachment behavior: A comparison of Euro-American and Puerto Rican mothers. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 37(4), 583-599.
14.
Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
15.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: Intercultural-differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hui, H. C., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism and collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.
18.
Hui, H. C., & Yee, C. (1994). The shortened Individualism-Collectivism Scale: Its relationship to demographic and work-related variables. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 409-424.
19.
Jaramillo, P. T., & Zapata, J. T. (1987). Roles and alliances within the Mexican-American and Euro-American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 727-735.
20.
Lochner, L. (1999). The relationship between the Super Woman construct and eating disorder symptoms and body image dissatisfaction among graduate students, medical students, and law students. Dissertation Abstracts Intercultural, 60(4-B), 1861.
21.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. Birmingham, NY: Vail Ballon Press.
22.
Markus, H., & Kitayama S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition emotion & motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Mirandé, A. (1997). Hombres y machos: Masculinity and Latino culture. Boulder, CO: Westview.
25.
Phillips, L. (1990). The power of representation: Agrarian politics and rural women's interpretations of the household in coastal Ecuador. Dialectical Anthropology, 15, 271-283.
26.
Quintas, F. (1989). Casa & familia: O cotidiano feminino [House and family: The daily life of females]. Cadernos de Estudos Sociais, 5(8), 75-96.
27.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals [Special issue]. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
29.
Stevens, E. (1973). Marianismo: The other face of machismo in Latin America. Female and male in Latin America: Essays. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
30.
Stone, L., & Mckee, N. (1999). Gender and culture in America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Tacón, A. M., & Caldera, Y. M. (2001). Attachment and parental correlates in late adolescent Mexican American women. Latino Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 23(1), 71-87.
32.
Tiano, S. (1997). The role of women. Understanding contemporary Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
33.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
34.
United Nations. (2001). Social indicators. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from the Statistics division of the United Nations Secretariat and International Labor office Web site: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/socind/inc-eco.htm.
35.
U.S. Department of State. (2002). Country reports on human right practices. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Web site: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18330.htm.
36.
Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997-1010.
