Two studies examined the influence of Eastern cultural heritage on relationship preferences among second generation immigrants to the West, and explicitly tested the mediating roles of interdependence and familial cultural influence in mate preferences. The first used a between-subjects approach to compare the preferred mate attributes of South Asian Canadians (n= 97) to those of Euro-Canadians (n= 89). The second study used a within-subject approach by using the strength of cultural identity of South Asian Canadians (n= 92) as a predictor of preferred attributes. Both studies found a culture influence on “traditional” mate attribute preferences. Moreover, familial cultural influence (e.g., family allocentrism) was a better mediator of the culture-traditional attribute preference relationship than the more generic measure of interdependent self-construal. The results further suggest that a cross-cultural approach, rather than a strength-of-culturalidentity approach, is better suited to tap into non-conscious influences of culture on behavior.
Abouguendia, M.,& Noels, K. A. (2001). General and acculturation-related daily hassles and psychological adjustment in first-and second-generation South Asian immigrants to Canada. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 163-173.
2.
Aycan, Z., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Impact of acculturation on socialization beliefs and behavioral occurrences among Indo-Canadian immigrants. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 451-467.
3.
Baron, R. M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Baumeister, R. F., Shapiro, J. P.,& Tice, D. M. (1985). Two kinds of identity crisis. Journal of Personality, 53, 407-424.
5.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34.
6.
Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologist preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 529-533.
7.
Betancourt, H.,& López, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. AmericanPsychologist, 48, 629-637.
8.
Boatswain, S. J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2000). Social identity and preferred ethnic/racial labels for Blacks in Canada. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 216-234.
9.
Buss, D.M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., et.al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: Astudy of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
10.
Cameron, J. E.,& Lalonde, R. N. (2001). Social identification and gender-related ideology inwomen and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 59-77.
11.
Cameron, J. E., Sato, T., Lalonde, R. N., & Lay, C. (1997). Developing a multidimensional measure of ethnic identity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto.
12.
Clément, R.,& Noels, K. A. (1992). Towards a situated approach to ethnolinguistic identity: The effects of status on individuals and groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 203-232.
13.
Clément, R., Noels, K. A., & Deneault, B. (2001). Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 559-577.
14.
Dasgupta, S. D. (1998). Gender roles and cultural continuity in the Asian Indian immigrant community in the U.S. Sex Roles, 38, 953-974.
15.
Dion, K. K.,& Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53-69.
16.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5-17.
17.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (2001). Gender and cultural adaptation in immigrant families. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 511-521.
18.
Dovidio, J. F.,& Esses, V. M. (2001). Immigrants and immigration: Advancing the psychological perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 375-387.
19.
Dugsin, R. (2001). Conflict and healing in family experience of second-generation emigrants from India living in North America. Family Process, 40, 233-241.
20.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R.,& Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske,& G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “His” and “Hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
23.
Gaines, S. O., Marelich, W. D., Bledsoe, K. L., Steers, W. N., Henderson, M. C., Granrose, C. S., et al. (1997). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460-1476.
24.
Goodwin, R.,& Cramer, D. (2000). Marriage and social support in a British-Asian community. Journal ofCommunity and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 49-62.
25.
Gupta, M. D. (1997). “What is Indian about you?”: A gendered, transnational approach to ethnicity. Gender andSociety, 11, 572-596.
26.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Hatfield, E.,& Sprecher, S. (1995). Men’s andwomen’s preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 26, 728-750.
28.
Hoffman, L. W., & Kloska, D. D. (1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32, 273-295.
29.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. PoliticalPsychology, 22, 127-156.
31.
Hynie, M. (1996). From conflict to compromise: Immigrant families and the processes of acculturation. In D. M. Taylor (Ed.), Diversity with justice and harmony: A social psychological analysis(pp. 97-123). Ottawa, Canada: Department of Citizenship and Immigration.
32.
Inman, A. G., Ladany, N., Constantine, M. G.,& Morano, C. K. (2001). Development and preliminary validation of the cultural values conflict scale for South Asian women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 17-27.
33.
Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603-609.
34.
Jose, P. E., Huntsinger, C. S., Huntsinger, P. R.,& Liaw, F. R. (2000). Parental values and practices relevant to young children’s social development in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 677-702.
35.
Kashima, E. S.,& Hardie, E. A. (2000). The development and validation of the Relational, Individual, and Collective Self-Aspects (RIC) Scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 19-48.
36.
Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S.C., Gelfand, M.J.,& Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: Aperspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
37.
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
38.
Kwak, K.,& Berry, J. W. (2001). Generational differences in acculturation among Asian families in Canada: Acomparison of Vietnamese, Korean, and East-Indian groups. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 152-162.
39.
La Fromboise, T., Coleman, H. K.,& Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395-412.
40.
Lalonde, R. N. (2002). Testing the social identity-intergroup differentiation hypothesis: We’re not American eh!British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 611-630.
41.
Lalonde, R. N., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1992). The process of social identification for visible immigrant women in a multicultural setting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 25-39.
Lonner, W. J.,& Berry, J. W. (1986). Sampling and surveying. In J. W. Lonner& J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research(pp. 85-110). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
45.
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.
46.
Moghaddam, F. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1987). The meaning of multiculturalism for visible minority immigrant women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 121-136.
47.
Naidoo, J. C. (1985). Contemporary South Asianwomen in the Canadian mosaic. International Journal of Women’sStudies, 8, 338-350.
48.
Naidoo, J. C.,& Davis, J. C. (1988). Canadian South Asian women in transition: A dualistic view of life. Journal ofComparative Family Studies, 19, 311-327.
49.
Nauck, B. (2001). Intercultural contact and intergenerational transmission in immigrant families. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 159-173.
50.
Pettys, G. L.,& Balgopal, P. R. (1998). Multigenerational conflicts and newimmigrants: An Indo-American experience. Families in Society, 79, 410-423.
51.
Phalet, K., & Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 186-201.
52.
Phinney, J. S., Ong, A., & Madden, T. (2000). Cultural values and intergenerational value discrepancies in immigrant and non-immigrant families. Child Development, 71, 528-539.
53.
Planalp, S., & Fitness, J. (1999). Thinking/feeling about social and personal relationships. Journal of Personal andSocial Relationships, 16, 731-750.
54.
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844-872.
55.
Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 174-185.
56.
Schwartz, S. H.,& Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
57.
Segal, U. A. (1991). Cultural variables in Asian Indian families. Families in Society, 72, 233-241.
58.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.
59.
Sprecher, S., & Chandak, R. (1992). Attitudes about arranged marriages and dating among men and women form India. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 20, 59-69.
60.
Talbani, A., & Hasanali, P. (2000). Adolescent females between tradition and modernity: Gender role socialization in south Asian immigrant culture. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 615-627.
61.
Tang, T. N.,& Dion, K. L. (1999). Gender and acculturation in relation to traditionalism: Perceptions of self and parents among Chinese students. Sex Roles, 41, 17-29.
62.
Terry, D. J.,& Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
63.
Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M. J. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
64.
Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y. W., & Lee, P. A. (2000). The meaning of “being Chinese” and “being American.”Journal ofCross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 302-332.
65.
van deVijver, F.,& Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Weston, J. L. (1994). South Asian women’s experience of acculturation: A representation of bicultural identity formation. Unpublished master’s thesis, York University, Toronto, Canada.
67.
Williams, J. E.,& Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: Amultinational study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
