Ina Chinese-Dutchscenariostudy(N = 433students), the authorsinvestigated subordinates’covert reactions to supervisory feedback. The study consisted of a 2 (personal orientation: collectivist vs. individualist) × 2 (performance perspective: collective vs. individual) × 2 (feedback favorability: positive vs. negative) completely crossed factorial design. The dependent variables were feedback quality, relational quality, emotional responses, and behavioral intentions. The authors found that feedback quality and relational quality tend to be higher for matched collectivist—collective and individualist—individual situations than for mismatched situations. They also found that collective situations enhance constructive behavioral intentions more than do individual situations and that positive feedback produces better information, better relationships, more pleasant emotions, and more constructive behavioral intentions than does equivalent negative feedback.
Adler, N. J. (2002). Internationaldimensionsof organizationalbehavior (4thed.).Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
2.
Alvero, A. M.,Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001).An objective review ofthe effectiveness andessential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985-1998).
3.
Anderson, J. (1970). Giving and receiving feedback. In G. W. Dalton, P. R. Lawrence, & L. E. Greiner (Eds.),Organizational change and development (pp. 339-346). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
4.
Archer, K. J., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology,134, 681-694.
5.
Argyris, C. (1970). Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
6.
Bailey, J. R., Chen, C. C., & Dou, S. -G. (1997). Conceptions of self and performance-related feedback in the US, Japan and China. Journal of International Business Studies,28, 605-625.
7.
Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,73, 199-207.
8.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology,85, 349-360.
9.
Bond, M. H., Wan, K. C., Leung, K., & Giacalone, R. A. (1985). How are responses to verbal insults related to cultural collectivism and power distance?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,16, 111-127.
10.
Cusella, L. P. (1987). Feedback, motivation, and performance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 624-678). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Daniels, A. C. (1994). Bringing out the best in people. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management,24, 265-304.
14.
Earley, P. C., Gibson, C. B., & Chen, C. C. (1999). “How did I do?” versus “How did we do?” Cultural contrasts of performance feedback use and self-efficacy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,30, 594-619.
15.
Gelfand, M. J., Higgins, M., Nishii, L. H., Raver, J. L., Dominguez, A., Murakami, F., et al. (2002). Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology,87, 833-845.
16.
Gelfand, M. J., Triandis, H. C., & Chan, D. K. -S. (1996). Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology,26, 397-410.
17.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1993). Giving effective feedback. In R. T. Golembiewsky (Ed.),Handbook of organizational consultation (pp. 331-334). New York: Marcel Dekker.
18.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review,106, 766-794.
19.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
House, R. J., Wright, N. S., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.),New perspectives on international industrial/ organizational psychology (pp. 535-625). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology,64, 349-371.
22.
Inglehart, R., Basañez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
24.
Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Nassau, S. R. (1989). Reactions to interpersonal evaluative feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,19, 862-884.
25.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997).Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.,),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology(2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1-50). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997).Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 1245-1267.
28.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin,119, 254-284.
29.
Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroeck, J. (1999). Total quality management and performance appraisal: An experimental study of process versus results and group versus individual approaches. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20, 445-457.
30.
Lam, S. S. K., Yik, M. S. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology,87, 192-201.
31.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology,87, 131-142.
32.
Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M. W. (2001). When is criticismnot constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations,54, 1155-1187.
33.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
London, M. (1997). Jobfeedback: Giving, seeking, andusingfeedback for performanceimprovement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
London, M., Larsen, H. H., & Thisted, L. N. (1999). Relationships between feedback and self-development. Group & Organization Management,24, 5-27.
36.
McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 836-844.
37.
Nadler, D. A. (1977). Feedback andorganizationdevelopment:Using data-basedmethods. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
38.
Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,23, 309-338.
39.
Nauta, A. (1996). Battle and bossiness in business: Interaction patterns in interpersonal conflict within bureaucratic and organic organization departments. Unpublished dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
40.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1986). Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology,71, 211-218.
42.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: Managing the white space on the organizational chart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependencein task-performinggroups. Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 61-72.
44.
Schein, E. H. (1988). Process consultation (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personalandorganizationalchange throughgroupmethods. New York: John Wiley.
46.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,20, 580-591.
47.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975-95. Academy of Management Journal,40, 1122-1149.
48.
Stephan, W. G., & Dorfman, P. W. (1989). Administrative and developmental functions in performance appraisals: Conflict or synergy?Basic and Applied Social Psychology,10, 27-41.
49.
Tracey, T. J. (1994). An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67, 864-878.
50.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Van de Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C., & Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,80, 271-281.
53.
Van de Vliert, E., & Janssen, O. (2002). ‘Better than’performance motives as roots of satisfaction across more and less developed countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33, 380-397.
54.
Wiggins, J. S. (1980). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 265-294). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
