Concepts of friendshipmay reflect the collectivism or individualismof societies or differences in their social structures. We asked Canadian (N = 300) and Cuban (N = 294) adolescents to write essays about the features that distinguish their best friends. Acceptance and loyalty were frequent features in the essays from both countries. Despite many cross-national similarities, there were significant differences in the frequency of responses referring to the intimacy potential of the friendship. These responses, which are of particular theoretical importance, were more common in the Cuban data. The Cuban participants also emphasized reciprocal help and admiration of their best friends’characters more frequently than did the Canadian participants. Shared pastimes and a shared history of prior social interaction were more frequent in the Canadian essays. These results provide some confirmation that friendship reasoning reflects the collectivism or individualism of the surrounding society.
Aguirre, B. E. (1984). The conventionalization of collective behavior in Cuba.American Journal of Sociology,90,541-566.
2.
Bigelow, B. J. (1982). On the interdependency between stage and sequence in the development of children’s friendship expectations. Journal of Psychology,110, 121-132.
3.
Bigelow, B. J., & LaGaipa, J. J. (1975). Children’s written descriptions of friendship: A multidimensional analysis. Developmental Psychology,11, 857-858.
4.
Bigelow, B. J., & LaGaipa, J. J. (1980). The development of friendship values and choice. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.),Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 15-44). New York: John Wiley.
5.
Bukowski, W. M., & Sippola, L. K. (1996). Friendship and morality: (How) are they related? In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.),The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 238-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Emler, N., & Hogan, R. (1992). Individualizing conscience: New thoughts on old issues. In W. M. Kurtines, M. Azmitia, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.),The role of values in psychology and human development (pp. 200-221). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Entralgo, J. (1985). Sobre la amistad [About friendship]. Madrid, Spain: Austral.
8.
Fabelo, J. R., Vitier, C., Domínguez, M. I., González-Rey, F., & Garcia-Batista, G. (1998). Formación de valores en la nueva generación [Guiding values in the new generation]. Havana, Cuba: Pueblo y Educación.
9.
Gibbons, J. L., Brusi-Figueroa, R., & Fisher, S. L. (1997). Gender-related ideals of Puerto Rican adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence,17, 349-370.
10.
Gibbs, J. C. (1991).Toward an integration of Kohlberg and Hoffman’s theories of morality. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Ed.),Handbookof moral behavior and development:Theory (Vol. 1, pp. 183-222).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
González-Rey, F. (1995). Personalidad, su formación y desarollo [Personality and its formation and its development]. Havana, Cuba: Pueblo y Educación.
12.
González-Rey, F. (1998). Los valores y su formación en la nueva generación [Values and values education for the new generation]. Havana, Cuba: Temas.
13.
Hart, D., Keller, M., Edelstein, W., & Hoffmann, V. (1998). Childhood personality influences on social-cognitive development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 1278-1289.
14.
Harwood, R. L., Miller, J. G., & Irizarry, N. L. (1995). Culture and attachment: Perceptions of the child in context. New York: Guilford.
15.
Keller, M., Edelstein, W., Schmidt, C., Fang, F., & Fang, G. (1998).Reasoningaboutresponsibilitiesand obligations in close relationships: A comparison across two cultures. Developmental Psychology,34, 731-741.
16.
Kelttikangas-Jarvinen, L., Terav, T., & Pakaslahti, L. (1999). Moral reasoning among Estonian and Finnish adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,30, 267-290.
17.
Kocmarek, I., & Barrs, S. (1988). Values education and the Board of Education for the City of Hamilton. International Journal of Education,3, 86-95.
18.
Krappmann, L., Uhlendorf, H., & Oswald, H. (1995, August). Existence and effects of close relationships in childhood and preadolescence. Paper presented at the convention of the European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Krakow, Poland.
19.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
20.
Moghaddam, F. M. (1997). The specialized society: The plight of the individual in an age of individualization. New York: Praeger.
21.
Moses, C. (2000). Everyday life in Castro’s Cuba. Wilmington, DL: Scholarly Resources.
22.
Ontario Ministry of Education.(1996). Values, influences, and peers. Toronto, Canada: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
23.
Oswald, H., & Krappmann, L. (1995). Social life of children in a former bipartite city. In P. Noack, M. Hofer, & J. Younniss (Eds.). Psychological responses to social change: Human development in changing environments: Prevention and intervention in childhood and adolescence (Vol., 18, pp. 163-185). Berlin: De Gruyter.
24.
Reed, D. R. C. (1997). Following Kohlberg. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmentaland clinical analyses. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,20, 580-591.
27.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Luca, J. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on selfngroup relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,53, 323-338.
28.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Yuill, N. (1993).Understandingof personality and dispositions. In M. Bennett (Ed.),The development of social cognition: The child as psychologist (pp. 87-110). New York: Guilford.
