A meta-analysis is reported of those cross-cultural reward allocation studies in which the allocator was not a recipient of the allocation. Results from 25 studies in 14 different cultures were included. Previous narrative reviews of the literature have used individualism-collectivism as an explanatory framework. However, it was found that Schwartz's hierarchy and Hofstede's power distance dimensions account best for cross-cultural differences in reward allocation. Individualism-collectivism was not related to effect size. Study designs and participants sampled (students versus employees) were identified as moderator variables. The findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications for cross-cultural research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
*Aral, S. O., & Sunar, D. G. (1977). Interaction and justice norms: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 178-186.
2.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 388-399.
3.
*Berman, J. J., & Murphy-Berman, V. A. (1996). Cultural differences in perceptions of allocators of resources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 494-509.
4.
*Berman, J. J., Murphy-Berman, V. A., & Singh, P. (1985). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in perceptions of fairness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 55-67.
5.
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Schwartz, S. (1992). Explaining choices in procedural and distributive justice across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 211-225.
6.
*Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.
7.
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
8.
Chang, W. C., & Quak, L. (2001). Effects of collectivism and work/reward distribution on the motivation to achieve in Singapore. Unpublished manuscript, National University of Singapore.
9.
*Chen, C. C. (1995). New trends in reward allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408-428.
10.
*Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hui, H. (1998). Deciding on equity or parity: a test of situational, cultural, and individual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 115-129.
11.
Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hunt, R. G. (1997). Testing the effects of vertical and horizontal collectivism: A study of reward allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 44-70.
12.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
13.
Cooper, H. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 442-449.
14.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
15.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
16.
Erez, M. (1994). Toward a model of cross-cultural I/O psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 559-608). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
17.
Erez, M. (1997). A culture based model of work motivation. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 193-242). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
18.
Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Fleiss, J. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
*Giacobbe-Miller, J. K., Miller, D. J., & Victorov, V. I. (1998). A comparison of Russian and U.S. pay allocation decisions, distributive justice judgments, and productivity under different payment conditions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 137-163.
21.
Harb, C., & Smith, P. B. (2001, July). Differentiating self-construals across cultures: Beyond independence and interdependence. Paper presented at the 5th European Regional Congress of the IACCP, Winchester, UK.
22.
Harris, R. J. (1980). Equity judgment in hypothetical four-person partnerships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 96-115.
23.
Harris, R. J., & Joyce, M. A. (1980). What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 165-179.
24.
Hedges, L. V. (1994a). Fixed effect models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Hedges, L. V. (1994b). Statistical considerations. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 29-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
27.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Hook, J. G., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 429-445.
29.
Hui, C. H., Triandis, C. H., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism an explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 145-157.
30.
*Hundley, G., & Kim, J. (1997). National culture and the factors affecting perceptions of pay fairness in Korea and the United States. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5, 325-341.
31.
Insko, C. A., Gilmore, R., Moehle, D., Lipsitz, A., Drenan, S., & Thibaut, J. W. (1982). Seniority in the generational transition of laboratory groups: The effects of social familiarity and task experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 557-580.
32.
Insko, C. A., Thibaut, J. W., Moehle, D., Wilson, M., Diamond, W. D., Gilmore, R., et al. (1980). Social evolution and the emergence of leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 431-448.
33.
James, K. (1993). The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup, and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in HRM (pp. 21-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
*Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K., & Isaka, H. (1988). Universalism in lay conceptions of distributive justice: A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 51-64.
35.
*Keats, D. M., & Fu-Xi, F. (1994). The development of concepts of fairness in rewards in Chinese and Australian children. In H. Grad, A. Blanco, & J. Georgas (Eds.), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 276-287). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
36.
*Kim, K. I., Park, H. J., & Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 188-198.
37.
Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocation across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 640-675). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
38.
*Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
39.
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de Carrasquel, S. R., Munoz, C., Hernandez, M., Murukami, F., et al. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286-302.
40.
*Leung, K., & Iwawaki, S. (1988). Cultural collectivism and distributive behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 35-49.
41.
*Leung, K., & Park, H. J. (1986). Effects of interactional goals on choice of allocation rule: A cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 111-120.
42.
Leung, K., & Tong, K. K. (2001, August/September). Toward a normative model of justice. Paper presented at the International Round Table on Innovations in Organizational Justice Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
43.
*Lin, Y.-H. W., Insko, C. A., & Rusbult, C. L. (1991). Rational selective exploitation among Americans and Chinese: General similarity, with one surprise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1169-1206.
44.
*Mahler, I., Greenberg, L., & Hayashi, L. (1981). A comparative study of rules of allocation: Japanese versus American. Psychologia, 24, 1-8.
45.
*Marin, G. (1981). Perceiving justice across cultures: Equity vs. equality in Colombia and in the United States. International Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 153-159.
46.
*Marin, G. (1982). La percepcion de justicia distributive en dos culturas [The perception of distributive justice in two cultures]. Revista Latinoamerica de Psicologia, 14, 29-36.
47.
*Marin, G. (1985). The preference for equity when judging the attractiveness and fairness of an allocator: The role of familiarity and culture. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 543-549.
48.
*Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A., & Kumar, P. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1267-1272.
49.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytical procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
53.
*Rusbult, C. E., Insko, C. A., & Lin, Y. W. (1995). Seniority-based reward allocation in the United States and Taiwan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 13-30.
54.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 1-65.
55.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Singelis, T. M. (2000). Some thoughts on the future of cross-cultural social psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 76-91.
57.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
58.
Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.
59.
Tornblum, K. Y., & Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica, 2, 161-173.
60.
*Tornblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D., & Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-77.
61.
Tower, R. K., Kelly, C., & Richards, A. (1997). Individualism, collectivism and reward allocation: A cross-national study in Russia and Britain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 331-345.
62.
Triandis, H. C., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (1997). Culture theory and the meaning of relatedness. In P.C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organisational psychology (pp. 13-52). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
63.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
64.
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
65.
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Wagstaff, G. F. (1997). Equity versus equality in allocations to adults and children. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 445-448.
67.
World Bank. (2000). World development report. Washington, DC: World Bank, Development Data Centre.
