The horizontal and vertical distinction within individualism and collectivism was used as a theoretical framework to predict differences in achievement values across two national cultures: Denmark and the United States. As expected, across multiple methods and informant groups, the United States was found to be more vertically oriented than Denmark and Denmark more horizontally oriented than the United States. These differences in cultural orientations also corresponded to differences in the importance placed on achievement and the display of success. In open-ended responses and quantitative ratings, U.S. individuals discussed the importance of achieving goals more frequently and evaluated achievement values more highly than Danes did. Implications for understanding the cultural antecedents of achievement values are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amir, Y. , & Sharon, I. (1987). Are social psychological laws cross-culturally valid?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 383-470.
2.
Askgaard, H. (1992). As Denmark sees herself and is seen by others. In P. Himmelstrup, K. Hegelund, & H. Askgaard (Eds.), Discover Denmark—On Denmark and the Danes: Past, present and future (pp. 7-26). Herning, Denmark: Danish Cultural Institute, Copenhagen and Systime Publishers.
3.
Bond, M. H. (1988). The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bond, M. H. , & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 13, 169-185.
5.
Campbell, D. T. (1986). Science’s social system of validity-enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science (pp. 108-135). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Choiu, J. (2001). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism among college students in the United States, Taiwan, and Argentina. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 667-678.
7.
Daun, A. (1991). Individualism and collectivity among Swedes. Ethnos, 56, 165-172.
8.
Daun, A. (1992). Modern and modest: Mentality and self-stereotypes among Swedes. In A. Sjoegren & L. Janson (Eds.), Culture and management (pp. 101-111). Stockholm, Sweden: Institution for International Business.
9.
de Mooij, M. (1998). Global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Feather, N. T. (1994). Values and culture. In W. J. Lonner & R. S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture (pp. 183-190). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Feather, N. T. (1998). Attitudes toward high achievers, self-esteem, and value priorities for Australian, American, and Canadian students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(6), 749-759.
13.
Feather, N. T. , Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1992). A comparative study of the value priorities of Australians, Australian Baha’is, and Expatriate Iranian Baha’is. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(1), 95-106.
14.
Fyans, L. J., Jr. , Maehr, M. L., Salili, F., & Desai, K. A. (1983). A cross-cultural exploration into the meaning of achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1000-1013.
15.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Grunert, S. C. , & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39-62.
17.
Hastrup, B. (1995). Contemporary Danish society: Danish democracy and social welfare. Copenhagen, Denmark: Reproset I/S.
18.
Himmelstrup, P. (1992). Discover Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Danske Kulturinstitut.
19.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-176.
21.
Hui, C. H. , & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131-152.
22.
Isherwood, J. (1992). As others see us. In P. Himmelstrup (Ed.), Discover Denmark (pp. 195-208). Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Danske Kulturinstitut.
23.
Kurman, J. , & Sriram, N. (2002). Interrelationships among vertical and horizontal collectivism, modesty, and self- enhancement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(1), 71-86.
24.
Leung, K. , & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133-151.
25.
Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Maheswaran, D. , & Shavitt, S. (2000). Issues and new directions in global consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 59-66.
27.
Malpass, R. S. (1977). Theory and method in cross-cultural psychology. American Psychologist, 32, 1069-1079.
28.
Marascuilo, L. A. , & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical methods for the social & behavioral sciences. New York: Freeman.
29.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18-48). New York: Springer Verlag.
30.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
31.
McClelland, D. C. (1963). Motivational patterns in Southeast Asia with special reference to the Chinese case. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 6-19.
32.
McCracken, G. (1988). The Long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Miller, J. G. (2001). The cultural grounding of social psychological theory. In A. Tesser & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 22-43). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
34.
Miracle, G. E. (1988). An empirical study of the usefulness of the back-translation technique for international advertising messages in print media. In J. D. Leckenby (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1988 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 51-56). Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
35.
Monahan, L. , Kuhn, D., & Shaver, P. (1974). Intrapsychic versus cultural explanations of the “fear of success” motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1), 60-64.
36.
Niles, S. (1998). Achievement goals and means: A cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(5), 656-667.
37.
Oishi, S. , Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1177-1189.
38.
Phalet, K. , & Lens, W. (1995). Achievement motivation and group loyalty among Turkish and Belgian youth. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 31-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
39.
Phalet, K. , & Schonpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 186-201.
40.
Pollay, R. W. (1987). On the value of reflections on the values in “the distorted mirror.”Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 104-109.
41.
Reddy, G. P. (1993). Danes are like that! Perspectives of an Indian anthropologist on the Danish Society. Mørke, Denmark: Grevas.
42.
Rodnick, D. (1955). The Norwegians. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
43.
Sandemose, A. (1933). A refugee crosses his tracks. Norway: H. Aschehoug. (W. Nygaard).
44.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp.1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
46.
Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Schwartz, S. H. , & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
48.
Schwartz, S. H. , & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878-891.
49.
Schwartz, S. H. , & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92-116.
50.
Singelis, T. M. , & Triandis, H. C. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240-276.
51.
Singelis, T. M. , Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
52.
Social challenges and mutual responsibility. (1997, January). Denmark Review, pp. 2-3.
53.
Soh, S. , & Leong, F. T. L. (2002). Validity of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(1), 3-15.
54.
Spence, J. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40(12), 1285-1295.
55.
Strange, M. (1996). Culture shock: A guide to customs in Denmark. Portland, OR: Graphic Arts Center.
56.
Tagil, S. (1995). Ethnicity and nation building in the Nordic world. London: C. Hurst.
57.
Tawney, R. H. (1926). Religion and the rise of capitalism. Gloucester, MA: Harcourt, Brace and World.
58.
Triandis, H. C. (1995a). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
59.
Triandis, H. C. (1995b). Motivation and achievement in collectivist and individualist cultures. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1-30). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
60.
Triandis, H. C. , Chen, X. P., & Chan, D. K. S. (1998). Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(2), 275-289.
61.
Triandis, H. C. , & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(1), 118-129.
62.
Triandis, H. C. , McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006-1020.
63.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 33-51.
65.
Wallechinsky, D. (1997, April 13). Are we still number one?Parade Magazine, pp. 4-7.
66.
Weldon, E. (1984). Deindividuation, interpersonal affect, and productivity in laboratory task groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 469-485.
67.
Wigfield, A. , & Eccles J. S. (1994). Children’s competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 107-139.
68.
World Factbook. (2000). Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency. Available from http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/.
69.
Yu, A. B. , & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
