The study investigates culture and gender differences in a specific self-regulation task: choosing a level of difficulty that will maximize achievement. Two hundred psychology students from Singapore and Israel accomplished a computerized anagram-solving task that allowed participants to choose a level of difficulty (25 trials, six difficulty levels). In this task, the number of points given for correct solutions was increased as the difficulty level was raised. Results showed cultural differences in attained scores: Israelis earned more points than Singaporeans. Moreover, women preferred significantly easier tasks, though this preference did not result in a different number of points. Immediate reaction to feedback (success vs. failure) showed a culture by gender interaction. It was suggested that Singaporean women prefer tasks that are too easy, whereas Israeli men prefer tasks that are too difficult. Both these preferences are detrimental to self-regulation efficiency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almog, O. (1994). “Hazabar”: Diokan sociology [The “Sabras”: A sociological profile]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Haifa (in Hebrew).
2.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
3.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Heatherton, T. H. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1-15.
4.
Baumeister, R. F. , Heatherton, T. H., & Tice, D. M. (1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 141-156.
5.
Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960-970.
6.
Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in self-perception and negative recall biases. Sex Roles, 38, 103-133.
7.
Beyer, S. , & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perception: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.
8.
Bond, M. H. (1996). Chinese values. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 208-226). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
9.
Bond, M. H. , & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of the Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 207-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Chang, W. C. , & Wong, W. K. (1997). The motivation to achieve in Singapore: In search of a core construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 885-895.
11.
Chew, I. K. H. , & Putti, J. (1995). Relationship on work-related values of Singaporean and Japanese managers in Singapore. Human Relations, 48, 1149-1170.
12.
Crandall, V. C. (1969). Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-Related Motives in Children (pp. 11-45). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
Elliot, A. J. , & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
14.
Gaeddert, W. P. , & Facteau, J. D. (1990). The effects of gender and achievement domain on two cognitive indices of striving in personal accomplishment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 522-535.
15.
Hess, R. D. , Chang, C. M., & McDevitt, T. M. (1987). Cultural variation in family beliefs about children’s performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People’s Republic of China, Chinese-American and Caucasian-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 179-188.
16.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. Deregowski, S. Druiraweic, & R. Annis (Eds.), Explications in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
18.
Jackson, D. N. (1984). Multidimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB) manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
19.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-50). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Kitayama, S. , Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
21.
Leung, K. (1996). The role of beliefs in Chinese culture. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 247-262). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
22.
Locke, E. A. , & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
23.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex-differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
25.
Mayzner, M. S. , & Tresselt, M. E. (1958). Anagram solution time: A function of letter order and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 376-379.
26.
Ortar, G. , & Muriely, A. (1966). The MILTA Test. Jerusalem: Hebrew University School of Education (in Hebrew).
27.
Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
28.
Roberts, T. , & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1989). Sex differences in reaction to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles, 21, 725-747.
29.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism, new cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 85-119). London: Sage.
30.
Stevenson, H. W. , Chen, C., & Lee, S. Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese and American: Ten years later. Science, 259, 53-58.
31.
Stevenson, H. W. , & Lee, S. Y. (1996). The academic achievement of Chinese students. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 124-142). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
32.
Stigler, J. W. , Smith, S., & Mao, L. W. (1985). The self-perception of competence by Chinese children. Child Development, 56, 1259-1270.
33.
Strube, M. J. , Lott, C. L., Le-Xuan-Hy, G. M., Oxenberg, J., & Deichmann, A. K. (1986). Self-evaluation of abilities: Accurate self-assessment versus biased self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 16-25.
34.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
Williams, J. E. , & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self—Viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Wright, G. N. , & Phillips, L. D. (1980). Cultural variation in probabilistic thinking: Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology, 15, 239-257.
37.
Wright, G. N. , Phillips, L. D., Whalley, P. C., Choo, G. T., Ng, K-O, Tan, I., & Wisudha, A. (1978). Cultural differences in probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 285-299.
38.
Yu, A-B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self and Chinese achievement motivation. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 227-246). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
