A method is presented for evaluating the presence and size of cross-cultural item biases. The examined items concern parental support and family cohesion in a Likert-type questionnaire for adolescents in The Netherlands. Each evaluated item has two versions, a collectivist and an individualistic one, that measure the same theoretical construct. The standardized difference between the score means of the item versions, called the Δe score, gives an indication of the cultural bias of the item. As expected, most items were found to yield a higher Δe when respondents scored low on an individualistic scale for acculturation or originated from countries that are (more) collectivist. This procedure is recommended for use in testing items in pilot studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1989 (pp. 201-234). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
2.
Berry, J. W. , Trimble, J. E., & Olmedo, E. L. (1986). Assessment of acculturation. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 291-324). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5.
Hays, W. L. (1974). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Empirical models of cultural differences. In N. Bleichrodt & P.J.D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology—Selected papers from a regional conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 4-20). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
8.
Holland, P. W. , & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Janssens, J. , Pels, T., Dekoviç, M, & Nijsten, C. (1999). Opvoedingsdoelen van autochtone and allochtone ouders [Educational goals of indigenous and foreign parents]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 38, 318-329.
10.
Kortmann, F. (1990). Psychiatric case finding in Ethiopia: Shortcomings of the Self Reporting Questionnaire. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 14, 381-391.
11.
Ott, L. , Mendenhall, W., & Larson, R. F. (1978). Statistics: A tool for the social sciences. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
12.
Pels, T. (Ed.) (1994). Opvoeding in Chinese, Marokkaanse en Surinaams-Creoolse gezinnen [Education in Chinese, Moroccan, and Surinamese-Creole families]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: ISEO.
13.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1995). Cultural bias in assessment: Historical and thematic issues. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 140-146.
14.
Poortinga, Y. H. , & Malpass, R. M. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 17-46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Tanzer, N. K. (1991). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive item structures and detecting cultural bias in nonverbal intelligence tests. In N. Bleichrodt & P.J.D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology—Selected papers from a regional conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 428-436). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
16.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1989 (pp. 41-134). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
Triandis, H. C. , McCusker, C., Betancourt, H., Iwao, S., Leung, K., Salazar, J. M., Setiadi, B., Sinha, J. B., Touzard, H., & Zaleski, Z. (1993). An etic-emic analysis of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 366-383.
18.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29-37.
20.
Van Niekerk, M. (1993). Ethnic studies in The Netherlands: An outline of research issues. Research Notes from The Netherlands, 1, 2-14.
