In a longitudinal design the parent-child resemblance and mutual transmission of two kinds of attitudes were studied: Tolerance of Alternative Lifestyles (cultural conservatism) and wish for Equality of Income and Property (economical conservatism). Four categories of adolescents were defined, ranging from strong youth centrist to strong non-youth centrist. Adolescent youth centrism concerns a fervent identification with peers and peer culture combined with distrust and loathing of the adult world and its institutions. At Time 1 (T1), the strong youth centrists do not set themselves apart. It is the group of strong non-youth centrists differentiating themselves by resembling their parents’ cultural conservatism far more than other young people do. During adolescence, youth centrists take over and communicate cultural conservatism in much the same way as their peers. With regard to economic conservatism, no significant differences were found at T1. During adolescence, however, strong youth centrists slightly increase the dissimilarity between their economic views and those of their parents, whereas strong non-youth centrists work to increase similarity in those orientations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acock, A. C. , & Bengtson, V. L. (1980). Socialization and attribution: Actual versus perceived similarity among parents and youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 501-515.
2.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). AMOS 4.01. Chicago: SmallWaters Corp.
3.
Beck, P. A. , & Jennings, M. K. (1975). Parents as “middlepersons” in political socialization. Journal of Politics, 37, 83-107.
4.
Bourdieu, P. , & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction: éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement [Reproduction: Elements of a theory on the system of social assignment]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
5.
Cooney, T. M. (1997). Parent-child relations across adulthood. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 451-468). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
6.
Dalhouse, A. C. , & Frideres, J. S. (1996). Intergenerational congruency: The role of the family in political attitudes of youth. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 227-248.
7.
Glass, J. , Bengtson, V. L., & Dunham, C. C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance or reciprocal influence?American Sociological Review, 51, 685-691.
8.
Jennings, M. K. , & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Hunstinx, P. (1998). Milieu, sekse, etniciteit en schoolloopbanen [Social background, gender, etnicity and school carreers]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
10.
Knutsen, O. (1995). The impact of old politics and new politics value orientations on party choice. A comparative study. Journal of Public Policy, 15, 1-63.
11.
Maassen, G. , & Meeus, W. (1993). De verhouding tussen jongeren en volwassenen [The relationship between adults and adolescents]. In W. Meeus & H. ‘t Hart (Eds.), Jongeren in Nederland [Young people in the Netherlands]. Amersfoort, the Netherlands: Academische Uitgeverij.
12.
Mannheim, K. (1928). Das Problem der Generationen [The problem of generations]. Kölner Vierteljahreshefte für Soziologie, 7, 157-185, 309-330.
13.
Meeus, W. (1986). De twee gezichten van het jeugdig conservatisme [The two faces of conservatism in youth]. In M. Matthijssen, W. Meeus, & F. Van Wel (Eds.), Beelden van Jeugd [Images of youth] (pp. 109-128). Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters Noordhof.
14.
Meeus, W. (1988). Adolescent rebellion and politics. Youth & Society, 19, 426-434.
15.
Meeus, W. (1989). Parental and peer support in adolescence. In K. Hurrelmann & U. Engel (Eds.), The social world of adolescents (pp. 167-185). New York: de Gruyter.
16.
Meeus, W. , Helsen, M., & Vollebergh, W. (1996). Parents and peers in adolescence: From conflict to connectedness. Four studies. In L. Verhofstadt-Denève, I. Kienhorst, & C. Braet (Eds.), Conflict and development in adolescence (pp. 103-116) Leiden, the Netherlands: DSWO-Press.
17.
Meeus, W. , Raaijmakers, Q., & Vollebergh, W. (1992). Political intolerance and youth centrism in adolescence: An overview of Dutch research and some recent longitudinal findings. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), The social psychology of political and economic cognition (pp. 97-120). London: Academic Press.
18.
Meeus, W. , & ‘t Hart, H. (1993). Jongeren in Nederland [Youth in the Netherlands]. Amersfoort, the Netherlands: Academische Uitgeverij Amersfoort.
19.
Middendorp, C. P. (1978). Progressiveness and conservatism. The fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and their relationship to social class. The Hague/Paris/New York: Mouton.
20.
Middendorp, C. P. (1991). Ideology in Dutch politics. The democratic system reconsidered 1970-1985. Assen/Maastricht, the Netherlands: van Gorcum.
21.
Miller, R. B. , & Glass, J. (1989). Parent-child attitude similarity across the life course. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 991-997.
22.
Moen, P. , Erickson, M. A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 281-293.
23.
Petit, G. S. , Clawson, M. A., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (1996). Stability and change in peer-rejected status: The role of child behavior, parenting and family ecology. Merill Palmer Quarterly, 42, 267-294.
24.
Raaijmakers, Q. (1993). Opvattingen over politiek en maatschappij [Beliefs on politics and society]. In W. Meeus & H. ‘t Hart (Eds.), Jongeren in Nederland [Youth in the Netherlands] (pp. 106-132). Amersfoort, the Netherlands: Academische Uitgeverij Amersfoort.
25.
Raaijmakers, Q. (1999). Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with Likert-type data: Introducing the relative mean substitution approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 725-748.
26.
Rabbie, J. M. , & Horwitz, M. (1969). The arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 223-228.
27.
Schofield, M. (1965). The sexual behaviour of young people. London: Longmans.
28.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
29.
Van Dam, B. (1993). Een generatie met verschillende gezichten [A generation with different faces]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: ITS.
30.
Van der Avort, A.J. P. M. (1988). Vrijzinnigheid in relaties, hedendaagse attitudes in de primaire levenssfeer [Freedom in relations, recent attitudes on primary relationships]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: ITS.
31.
Vinken, H. (1998). Political values and youth centrism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
32.
Vollebergh, W. A. M. , Iedema, J., & Meeus, W. (1999). The emerging gender gap: Cultural and economic conservatism in the Netherlands 1970-1992. Political Psychology, 20, 291-327.
33.
Vollebergh, W. A. M. , Iedema, J., & Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. (in press). The formation of cultural orientations in adolescence: Status inheritance, intergenerational transmission and internalization of attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family.
34.
Watts, M. W. , & Zinnecker, J. (1988). Youth culture and politics among German youth: Effects of youth centrism. In J. Hazekamp, W. Meeus, & Y. te Poel (Eds.), European contributions to youth research (pp. 93-101). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Free University Press.
35.
Zinnecker, J. (1982). Die Gesellschaft der Altersgleichen. [The society of peers] In A. Fischer (Hrsg.), Jugend ‘81 (pp. 422-673). Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
