Past research on morality has emphasized a single justice-based moral ethic. Expanding this conception of morality, Shweder has proposed a universal taxonomy of three moral rhetorics related to justice, interdependence, and purity. Five studies tested the hypothesis that American morality emphasizes the justice-based rhetoric, whereas Filipino morality is represented by all three rhetorics. In the first three studies, American examples were modally justice based, whereas Filipinos generated examples in approximately equal proportions from each rhetoric. In Study 4, Americans rated justice-based rules higher on criteria of morality than rules from other rhetorics; Filipinos rated rules from all three rhetorics as moral. In Study 5, the association between anger and moral violations was stronger for Americans than for Filipinos, consistent with American emphasis on the moral stature of justice. Discussion focused on the origins and consequences of the American emphasis on rights and the balanced representation of morality observed in Filipinos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Area Handbook of the Philippines. (1995). Baton Rouge, LA: Claitor’s.
2.
Bersoff, D. M. , & Miller, J. G. (1993). Culture, context, and the development of moral accountability judgments. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 664-676.
3.
Church, A. T. (1987). Personality research in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102(2), 272-292.
4.
Dien, D. S. (1983). A Chinese perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development, pp. 85-97.
5.
Eisenberg-Berg, N. , & Mussen, P. (1978). Empathy and moral development in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 14, 185-186.
6.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
7.
Gielen, U. , & Kelly, D. (1983, February). Buddhist Ladakh: Psychological portrait of a non-violent culture. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research, Washington, DC.
8.
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of the self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481-517.
9.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Gowing, P. G. (1979). Muslim Filipinos—Heritage and horizon. Quezon City, Philippines: New Day.
11.
Haidt, J. , Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.
12.
Keltner, D. , & Buswell, B. N. (1996). Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt: A study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 10(2), 155-171.
13.
Keltner, D. , Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752.
14.
Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In L. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-284). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice: Vol. 1. Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
16.
Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Lapuz, L. V. (1978). A study of psychology. Quezon City, Philippines: New Day.
18.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Lutz, C. , & White, G. (1986). The anthropology of emotions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 405-436.
20.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
21.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
22.
Miller, J. G. , & Bersoff, D. M. (1992). Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 541-554.
23.
Miller, J. G. , & Bersoff, D. M. (1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 592-602.
24.
Miller, J. G. , Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 33-47.
25.
Morris, M. W. , & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
26.
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Nisan, M. (1987). Moral norms and social conventions: A cross-cultural comparison. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 719-725.
28.
Reid, B. V. (1990). Weighing up the factors: Moral reasoning and culture change in a Samoan community. Ethos, 18(1), 48-70.
29.
Ross, L. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
Rozin, P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18-24.
31.
Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there a universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross- cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102-141.
32.
Shweder, R. A. , & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Shweder, R. A. , Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1990). Culture and moral development. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 130-204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Shweder, R. A. , Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
Snarey, J. R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 202-232.
36.
Solomon, R. C. (1990). A passion for justice. New York: Addison-Wesley.
37.
Steinberg, D. J. (1990). The Philippines: A singular and plural place (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Triandis, H. C. , McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
39.
Turiel, E. (1977). Distinct conceptual and developmental domains: Social convention and morality. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 77-116). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
40.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Vasudev, J. (1981, December). The morality of care and responsibility in Indian women and men: An application of Gilligan’s scheme. Paper presented at the International Conference on Morality and Moral Development, Miami Beach, FL.
42.
Watkins, D. , & Gerong, A. (1997). Culture and spontaneous self-concept among Filipino college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(4), 480-488.
43.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
