The influence of a gender system in a language on perception was examined in a cross-cultural study. Participants were from two language groups, one with a gender system, Spanish, and the other with a limited gender system, English. In each language group, participants were from three age groups: 5-7 years old, 8-10 years old, and adult. In one experiment, participants were asked to put a typical male or female name to 20 objects. In another experiment, participants were asked to assign attributes to the objects. Language gender tags influenced the Spanish adults and the 8- to 10-year-olds in their choice of gender assignment, whereas perceived attributes influenced the younger Spanish children and English speakers (both adults and children). It appears that in a language with a grammatical gender system, such as Spanish, the gender system creeps into perception after the gender tags have been acquired.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Au, T. (1983). Chinese and English counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf hypotheses revisited. Cognition, 15, 155-187.
2.
Au, T. (1992). Counterfactual reasoning. In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 194-213). London: Sage.
3.
Brown, R. (1976). Reference: In memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition, 4, 125-153.
4.
Brown, R. , & Lenneberg, E. (1954). A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 454-462.
5.
Clarke, E. V. (1986). Acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
6.
Clarke, M. A. , Losoff, A., McCracken, M. D., & Still, J. (1981). Gender perception in Arabic and English. Language Learning, 31, 159-167.
7.
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Faraday, A. (1973). Dream power. New York: Afor.
9.
Flaherty, M. , & Richardson, W. (1996). Cognition, perception and deixis: The expression of spatial relationships in Spanish and English. In Time, space and identity (pp. 28-30). Proceedings of the Second International Colloquium on Deixis. France: Centre de Recherche en Informatique de Nancy.
10.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Gill, W. S. (1967). Animal content in the Rorschach. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, pp. 49-56.
12.
Guiora, A. Z. , Beit-Hallahmi, B., Fried, R., & Yoder, C. (1982). Language environment and gender identity attainment. Language Learning, 32, 289-304.
13.
Gumperz, J. J. , & Levinson, S. C. (1991). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 32, 613-623.
14.
Hapkiewicz, W. G. (1979). Children’s reactions to cartoon violence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 8, 30-34.
15.
Hardin, C. , & Banaji, M. R. (1993). The influence of language on thought. Social Cognition, 11, 277-308.
16.
Heij, W. L. , Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
17.
Hill, J. H. , & Mannheim, B. (1992). Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 381-406.
18.
Hinds, J. (1982). Ellipsis in Japanese. Edmonton, Canada: Linguistic Research.
19.
Hjelmslev, L. (1956). On numerus og genus [On number and gender]. In L. L. Hammarich (Ed.), Festskrift til Christen Moller (pp. 167-190). Copenhagen: Borgens.
20.
Hofstatter, P. R. (1963). Uber sprachliche Bestimmungsleistungen: Das Problem des grammatikalischen Geschlechts von Sonne und Mond. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 10, 91-108.
21.
Hopper, R. , & LeBaron, C. (1998). How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(1), 59-74.
22.
Hunt, E. B. , & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98, 377-389.
23.
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232-239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin. (Reprinted 1975)
25.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Kashima, E. S. , & Kashima, Y. (1997). Practice of the self in conversations: Pronoun drop, sentence coproduction, and contextualization of the self. In K. Leung, Y. Kashima, U. Kim, & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (pp. 165-179). Singapore: Wiley.
27.
Kempen, G. , & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.
28.
Li, C. N. , & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457-489). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language No. 12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Maratsos, M. P. , & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children’s syntax, the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language (Vol. 2). New York: Gardner.
31.
Mathiot, M. , & Roberts, M. (1979). Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In M. Mathiot (Ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf revisited (Contributions to the sociology of language No. 27), (pp. 1-47). The Hague: Mouton.
32.
Mills, A. E. (1981). The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer.
33.
Mills, A. E. (1986). Acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (4th ed. 1964)
35.
Sapir, E. (1970). Language. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Culture, language and personality: Selected essays (pp. 1-44). Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Thompson, T. L. , & Zerbinos, E. (1995). Gender roles in animated cartoons: Has the picture changed in 20 years?Sex Roles, 32(9/10), 651-673.
37.
Tucker, G. R. , Lambert, W. E., & Rigault, A. (1977). The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behaviour. The Hague: Mouton.
38.
Vurpillot, E. , & Brault, H. (1959). Etude experimentelle sur la formation des schemes empiriques. L’Annee Psychologique, 59(2), 381-394.
39.
Weinold, G. (1967). Genus und Semantik. Konigstein im Taunus: Anton Hain Meisenheim.
40.
Whorf, B. L. , & Carroll, J. B. (Eds.). (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Zubin, D. A. , & Kopcke, K. M. (1984). Affect classification in the German gender system, Lingua, 63, 41-96.
