The extent to which methodological tools can help correct the overemphasis on fact finding and speed up the slow theoretical progress in cross-cultural psychology is analyzed. Two types of contributions to the current predicament are delineated. First, cross-cultural psychologists have created their own partis pris. Second, partis pris have been inherited from mainstream psychology. In the future, most cross-cultural studies will be carried out by researchers who have an interest in cultural variations on specific variables or instruments, whereas the group of researchers who spend their professional lives in cross-cultural psychology will remain small but influential. Methodological issues arising in studies by both groups are described. Important trends are (a) the change from exploration to explanation of cross-cultural differences, which has implications for the design of cross-cultural studies; and (b) the so-far-hesitant usage of recently developed statistical techniques, such as item response theory, structural equation modeling, and multilevel modeling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style. Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Berry, J. W. , Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology. Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bollen, K. A. , & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bryk, A. S. , & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer.
6.
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modelling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, D. T. , & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
8.
Cheung, F. M. (1996). The assessment of psychopathology in Chinese societies. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 393-411). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
9.
Cheung, F. M. , Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181-199.
10.
Cheung, F. M. , Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie, D. (1998). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
Cheung, G. , & Rensvold, R. B. (in press). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modelling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
12.
Christensen, L. B. (1997). Experimental methodology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Cohen, D. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern homicide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551-567.
14.
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
15.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Cudeck, R. , & Claassen, N. (1983). Structural equivalence of an intelligence test for two language groups. South-African Journal of Psychology, 13, 1-5.
17.
Ellis, B. B. , Becker, P., & Kimmel, H. D. (1993). An item response theory evaluation of an English version of the Trier Personality Inventory (TPI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 133-148.
18.
Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.
19.
Entwistle, B. , Mason, W. M., & Hermalin, A. I. (1985). The multilevel dependence of contraceptive use on socioeconomic development and family planning program strength. Demography, 23, 199-215.
20.
Eysenck, H. J. , & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1983). Recent advances in the cross-cultural study of personality. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 41-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Faucheux, C. (1976). Cross-cultural research in experimental social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 269-322.
22.
Georgas, J. , van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Berry, J. W. (1999). Ecosocial indicators and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
24.
Hambleton, R. K. , & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
25.
Hambleton, R. K. , Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Hedges, L. V. , & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
27.
Hess, R. D. , Chang, C. M., & McDevitt, T. M. (1987). Cultural variations in family beliefs about children’s performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People’s Republic of China, Chinese-American, and Caucasian-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 179-188.
28.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
29.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Inglehart, R. (1993). World Values Survey 1990-1991. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan.
31.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1-49). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.
34.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Leung, K. (1989). Cross-cultural differences: Individual-level vs. culture-level analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 703-719.
36.
Leung, K. , & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133-151.
37.
Leung, K. , Lau, S., & Lam, W. L. (1998). Parenting styles and academic achievement: A cross-cultural study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 157-172.
38.
Leung, K. , & Zhang, J. X. (1995). Systemic considerations: Factors facilitating and impeding the development of psychology in developing countries. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 693-706.
39.
Little, T. D. , Oettingen, G., Stetsenko, A., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Children’s action-control beliefs and school performance: How do American children compare with German and Russian children?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 686-700.
40.
Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a “global-community psychology.”American Psychologist, 53, 1282-1291.
41.
McCrae, R. R. , Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
42.
Meehl, P. E. (1991). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. In R. E. Snow & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science. A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach (pp. 13-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 85-128). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Modulative and generative orientations in psychology: Implications for psychology in the three worlds. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 21-41.
45.
Muthén, B. O. (1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 338-354.
46.
Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376-398.
47.
Myers, D. G. , & Diener, E. (1996). The pursuit of happiness. Scientific American, 274(5), 54-56.
48.
Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and U.S. regional culture. American Psychologist, 48, 441-449.
49.
Öngel, Ü. , & Smith, P. B. (1994). Who are we and where are we going? JCCP approaches its 100th issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 25-53.
50.
Poortinga, Y. H. , & Malpass, R. S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 17-46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Poortinga, Y. H. , & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259-282.
52.
Schliemann, A. , Caraher, D., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). Everyday cognition. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 177-216). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
54.
Sinha, D. (1987). Psychology in India: A historical perspective. In G. H. Blowers & A. M. Turtle (Eds.), Psychology moving East: Status of Western psychology in Asia and Oceania (pp. 39-52). Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco: Westview.
56.
van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
57.
van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Leung, K. (1997a). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Leung, K. (1997b). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 257-300). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
59.
van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Poortinga, Y. H. (1982). Cross-cultural generalization and universality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 387-408.
60.
van de Vijver, F. J. R. , & Poortinga, Y. H. (in press). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University.
61.
Williams, J. E. , Satterwhite, R. C., & Saiz, J. L. (1998). The importance of psychological traits. New York: Plenum.
