Trauma-Informed Interventions: Conceptual Challenges and Meaningful Field Practices

Abstract

Since the United Nations adopted the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (the “Palermo Protocol”) in 2000, a global campaign against human trafficking has emerged. Despite significant progress over the last two decades—supported by billions of dollars in investment—our understanding of effective prevention and response strategies remains limited, particularly those that prioritize victim-centered and trauma-informed approaches (TIC). The dearth of scientific evidence has not stopped funding agencies and service providers from marching forward, touting treatment principles with manualized services and moving testimonials. A growing number of researchers and policymakers are beginning to demand evidence on intervention efficacies, urge intervention development research, and push for accountability for the massive investment in this field. This paper points out the current ill-defined emphasis on victim-centered and trauma-informed interventions and attempts to give content and clarification to what TIC may pertain. This paper ends with an empirical attempt by one leading funding agency that took a deliberate path with a series of initiatives that required intervention development research, direct involvement of the target populations in program planning and implementation, phased scale-up of programming services, as well as rigorous impact evaluation.