The Gartner-Siverson war initiation model's focus on selection bias and initiators selecting vulnerable targets is attractive, but it demands further specification. A predictive model of war initiations might not retain statistical significance after 1945. The authors examine 16 possibly related variables and develop a three-variable initiation model, adding information on target regime type and war duration to the original lone initiator-lone target variable for war initiations between 1816 and 1992. The instability of the initiation model before and after 1945 can be traced to changes in who initiates wars. The predatory initiator model does not predict minor power dyads very well, and these dyads have come to dominate the post-1945 war landscape. Several reasons for this phenomenon are suggested, including the argument that the context in which weaker states initiate wars renders opportunistic predators less likely and less successful.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arquilla, John . 1992. Dubious battles: Aggression, defeat, and the international system. Washington, DC: Crane Russak.
2.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam III. 1996. The duration of interstate wars, 1816-1985. American Political Science Review90:239-257.
3.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam III. 1998. The declining advantages of democracy: A combined model of war outcomes and duration. Journal of Conflict Resolution42:344-366.
4.
Blainey, Geoffrey . 1973. The causes of war. New York: Free Press.
5.
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1962. Conflict and defense: A general theory. New York: Harper & Brothers.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative analysis of regime types and accountability. American Political Science Review89:841-855.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review86:638-647.
9.
Burkhart, Ross E. , and Michael Lewis-Beck. 1994. Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review88:903-910.
10.
Cannizzo, Cynthia . 1980. The costs of combat. In The correlates of war II, edited by J. DavidSinger. New York: Free Press.
11.
Cotton, T.Y.C.1986. Wars and American democracy: Voting trends in the last five American wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution30:616-635.
12.
Degenhardt, Henry W. 1986. Treaties and alliances of the world. 4th ed.Detroit, MI: M. Gale Research.
13.
Fearon, James . Forthcoming. Selection effects and deterrence. In Deterrence debates: Problems of definition, specification, and estimation, edited by Kenneth Oye. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Gartner, Scott S. , and Randolph M. Siverson. 1996. War expansion and war outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution40:4-15.
15.
Holsti, K. J. 1996. The state, war, and the state of war. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Humberto, Guzman Luis . 1996. Nicaragua's armed forces: An assessment of their political power. In Beyond praetorianism: The Latin American military in transition, edited by Richard C.Millett and Michael Gold-Bliss. Miami: North-South Center Press, University of Miami.
17.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted R. Gurr. 1995. Transitions to democracy: Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32:469-482.
18.
Kugler, Jacek , and William Domke. 1986. Comparing the strength of nations. Comparative Political Studies19:39-69.
19.
Lake, David A.1992. Powerful pacifists: Democratic states and war. American Political Science Review86:24-37.
20.
Lemke, Douglas . 1996. Small states and war: An expansion of power transition theory. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, 77-91. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Mueller, John E. 1973. War, presidents and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Nevin, John A.1996. War initiation and selection by consequences. Journal of Peace Research33:99-108.
23.
Oren, Ido . 1990. The war proneness of alliances. Journal of Conflict Resolution34:208-233.
24.
Organski, A.F.K. , and Jacek Kugler. 1978. Davids and Goliaths: Predicting the outcomes of international wars. Comparative Political Studies11:141-180.
25.
Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam III. 1998a. Democracy, war initiation, and victory. American Political Science Review92:377-389.
26.
Reiter. Dan , and Allan C. Stam III. 1998b. Democracy and battlefield military effectiveness. Journal of Conflict Resolution42:259-277.
27.
Rosen, Steven . 1972. War power and the willingness to suffer. In Peace, war and numbers, edited by Bruce M. Russett, 167-183. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Singer, J. David . 1991. Peace in the global system: Displacement, interregnum, or transformation? In The long postwar peace: Contending explanations and projections, edited by Charles W. Kegley, Jr., 56-84. New York: HarperCollins.
30.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1966. Formal alliances, 1815-1939: A quantitative description. Journal of Peace Research3:1-32.
31.
Singer, J. David , Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war and numbers, edited by Bruce M. Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Siverson, Randolph M.1995. Democracies and war participation: In defense of the institutional constraints argument. European Journal of International Relations1:481-489.
33.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1969. Formal alliances, 1816-1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research6:257-282.
34.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1970. Patterns in international warfare, 1816-1965. Annals391:145-155.
35.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Stam, Allan C., III . 1996. Win, lose or draw: Domestic politics and the crucible of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Stein, Arthur S. , and Bruce M. Russett. 1980. Evaluating war: outcomes and consequences. In Handbook of political conflict: Theory and research, edited by Ted Gurr, 399-422. New York: Free Press.
38.
Thompson, William R. 1995. Foreign policy, the end of the cold war, and the 1992 election. In The new American politics, edited by Bryan D. Jones, 167-190. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
Tilly, Charles . 1975. Western state making and theories of political transformation. In The formation of national states in Western Europe, edited by Charles Tilly, 3-83. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
Wang, Kevin , and James Lee Ray. 1994. Beginners and winners: The fate of initiators of interstate wars involving great powers since 1495. International Studies Quarterly38:139-154.
41.
Wayman, Frank , J. David Singer, and Gary Goertz. 1983. Capabilities, allocations and success in militarized disputes and war, 1816-1976. International Studies Quarterly27:497-515.
