Robert Axelrod's model of the spread of culture is extended to demonstrate that social interaction can function as an algorithm for optimizing cognition. Mental structures can be represented as strings of symbols that can be evaluated according to some criterion of goodness. Individuals interact with their neighbors, often resulting in patterns of similarities within and differences between regions of the population. Group-level phenomena, in turn, result in the optimization of individual structures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. , E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum, eds. 1968. Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Axelrod, R.1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:203-226. Reprinted in The complexity of cooperation, by R. Axelrod, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bandura, A. 1965. Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. In Advances in experimental social psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, vol. 2, 1-55. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Bandura, A. . 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bourgeois, M. J. , and B. Latané. 1995. Dynamic social impact causes spatially clustered and correlated opinions. Poster presented at the American Psychological Society conference, July, New York.
6.
Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Campbell, D. T. 1965. Ethnocentrism and other altruistic motives. In Nebraska symposium on motivation, edited by D. Levine, 282-311. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
8.
Eberhart, R. C. , and J. Kennedy. 1995. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science (Nagoya, Japan), edited by IEEE Service Center, 39-43. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.
9.
Eberhart, R. C. , P. Simpson, and R. Dobbins. 1996. Computational intelligence PC tools. Boston: Academic Press.
10.
Gallup Organization . 1995. No immediate signs Simpson trial intensified racial animosity: Public's outlook on race relations remains bleak. The Gallup Organization Newsletter Archive60 (22). Available from http//:www.gallup.com.
11.
Hopfield, J. J.1982. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences79:2554-2558.
12.
Hopfield, J. J.1984. Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences81:3088-3092.
13.
Insko, C. A. , and J. Schopler. 1987. Categorization, competition and collectivity. In Group processes, edited by C. Hendrick, vol. 8, 213-251. New York: Russell Sage.
14.
Kauffman, S. 1995. At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Kennedy, J. 1996. Social optimization of continuous-valued Heiderian networks. Presentation at the International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, February, Charleston, South Carolina.
16.
Kennedy, J. 1997. The particle swarm: Social adaptation of knowledge. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (Indianapolis, Indiana), edited by IEEE Service Center, 303-308. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.
17.
Kennedy, J. , and R. C. Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (Perth, Australia), edited by IEEE Service Center, vol. 4, 1942-1948. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.
18.
Kunda, Z. , and P. Thagard. 1996. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review103:284-308.
19.
Latané, B.1981. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist36:343-356.
20.
Latané, B. , and T. L'Herrou. 1996. Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70:1218-1230.
21.
Moscovici, S. 1985. Social influence and conformity. In Handbook of social psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, vol. 2, 347-412. New York: Random House.
22.
Newell, A. , and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Nowak, A. , J. Szamrej, and B. Latané. 1990. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review97:362-376.
24.
Rich, E. 1983. Artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Rumelhart, D. E. , P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland, and G. E. Hinton. 1986. Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, edited by J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, vol. 2, 7-57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Saxe, J. G. [1869] 1936. The blind men and the elephant. In The best loved poems of the American people, edited by H. Felleman, 521-522. Reprint, New York: Doubleday.
27.
Tajfel, H. 1978. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In Differentiation between social groups, edited by H. Tajfel, 61-76. London: Academic Press.
28.
Thagard, P., and K. Verbeurgt. 1995. Coherence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo.
29.
Wetzel, C. G. , and C. A. Insko. 1982. The similarity-attraction relationship: Is it an ideal one?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18:253-276.
30.
Winston, P. H. 1992. Artificial intelligence. 3d ed.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
