The authors present a game-theoretic analysis of negotiations involving two players: the government of a country of origin and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), in which the latter represents refugees, countries of asylum, and donor countries at the negotiating table. Ordinal preference orderings of outcomes allow the authors to represent the attitudes of governments in countries of origin toward their refugees as well as the urgency of repatriation for countries of asylum and donor countries. For alternative configurations of preference orderings, the authors analyze repatriation negotiations using classical game theory and the theory of moves, which assume different rules of play. They find the theory of moves is better suited for understanding efforts to achieve repatriation agreements in actual refugee crises and conclude with reflections on the difficulties of reaching repatriation agreements in recent years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, M. A.1994. Exodus: The world refugee crisis. Foreign policy95:175-183.
2.
Allen, T. , and H. Morsink. 1994. Introduction. In When refugees go home, edited by T. Allen and H. Morsink, 1-13. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
3.
Bascom, J. 1994. The dynamics of refugee repatriation: The case of Eritreans in eastern Sudan. In Population migration and the world order, edited by B. Gould and A. Findlay, 225-248. Sussex, UK: Wiley.
4.
Bennett, P. G.1995. Modeling decisions in international relations: Game theory and beyond. Mershon International Studies Review39:19-52.
5.
Brams, S. J.1981. Nonmyopic equilibria 2 × 2 games. Conflict Management and Peace Science6:39-62.
6.
Brams, S. J. 1994. Theory of moves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brams, S. J. , and M. P. Hessel. 1984. Threat power in sequential games. International Studies Quarterly28:23-44.
8.
Brams, S. J. , and W. Mattli. 1993. Theory of moves: Overview and examples. Conflict Management and Peace Science12:1-39.
9.
Crisp, J.1984. The politics of repatriation: Ethiopian refugees in Djibouti. Review of African Political Economy30:73-82.
10.
Dowty, A. 1995. Return or compensation: The legal and political context of the Palestinian refugee issue. In World refugee survey, edited by V. Hamilton, 26-32. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
11.
Frelick, B. 1994. The year in review. In World refugee survey, edited by V. Hamilton, 2-9. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
12.
Gertov, M.1991. Open borders: A global-humanist approach to the refugee crisis. World Development19:485-496.
13.
Gibbons, R. 1992. Game theory for economists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Hakovirta, H.1993. The global refugee problem: A model and its application. International Political Science Review14:35-57.
15.
Hamilton, V. , ed. 1991. World refugee survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
16.
Hamilton, V. , ed. 1992. World refugee survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
17.
Hamilton, V. , ed. 1994. World refugee survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
18.
Hansen, A. 1993. African refugees: Defining and defending their human rights. In Human rights and governance in Africa, edited by R. Cohen, G. Hyden, and W. Nagan, 139-167. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
19.
Hansen, A. 1995. Reconstructing postwar Eritrean rural society and economy: The case of Gash-Setit province. Paper presented at the 1995 annual meetings of the African Studies Association, November, Orlando, FL.
20.
Holborn, L. 1975. Refugees: A problem of our time. Metchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
21.
Morris, N.1990. Refugees: Facing crisis in the 1990s—A personal view from within UNHCR. International Journal of Refugee Law57 (special issue).
22.
Morrow, J. D. 1994. Game theory for political scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Newland, K.1994. Refugees: The rising flood. World Watch7:10-20.
24.
Nobel, P., ed. 1982. Refugee law in the Sudan. Research report 64. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.
25.
Pitterman, S. 1987. Determinants of international refugee policy: A comparative study of UNHCR material assistance to refugees in Africa, 1963-1981. In Refugees: A third world dilemma, edited by J. R. Rogge, 15-36. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
Ranger, T. 1994. Studying repatriation as part of African social history. In When refugees go home, edited by T. Allen and H. Morsink, 279-294. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
27.
Rogge, J. 1994. Repatriation of refugees: A not-so-simple “optimum” solution. In When refugees go home, edited by T. Allen and H. Morsink, 14-49. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
28.
Ruiz, H. A. 1993. Repatriation: Tackling protection and assistance concerns. In World Refugee Survey, edited by V. Hamilton, 20-29. Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Refugees.
29.
Schelling, T. 1960. The strategy of conflict. London: Oxford University Press.
30.
Simon D. , and R. Preston. 1993. Return to the promised land: Repatriation and resettlement of Namibian refugees, 1989-90. In Geography and refugees, edited by R. Black and V. Robinson, 47-63. London: Belhaven.
31.
Stein, B. 1994a. Policy challenges regarding repatriation in the 1990's: Is 1992 the year for voluntary repatriation? Paper commissioned by the Program on International and U.S. Refugee Policy, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
32.
Stein, B. 1994b. Ad hoc assistance to return movements and long-term development programmes. In When refugees go home, edited by T. Allen and H. Morsink, 50-70. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
33.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) . 1988. Overview of UNHCR activities: Report for 1987-88. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
34.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) . 1993a. The state of the world's refugees: The challenge of protection. New York: Penguin.
35.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) . 1993b. General and special programmes: Their relationship. Paper presented at the 25th meeting of the Subcommittee on Administrative and Financial Matters, May 10, Document Number EC/1993/SC.2/CRP.11.
36.
Warner, D. 1994. Voluntary repatriation and the meaning of return to home: A critique of liberal mathematics. Presented at the 1994 meeting of the International Refugees Advisory Panel, January, Oxford, Great Britain. Mimeographed paper.
