A laboratory study examined effects of friendship on expectations of pricing in personal business transactions. Friends expect to pay more but charge less for a variety of commodities than do strangers. Remarkably, without discussion, friends agree on prices for commodities, whereas strangers do not. The result was replicated in a second study and extended to other commodities. The effect may be due to cognitive scripts for transactions with friends.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, W. , and N. C. McGinn. 1977. Sex differences in choice of distribution rules. Journal of Personality45:379-394.
2.
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
3.
Boulding, K. E. 1973. The economy of love and fear. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Carroll, J. S. , M. H. Bazerman, and R. Maury. 1988. Negotiator cognitions: A descriptive approach to negotiators' understanding of their opponents. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes41:352-370.
5.
Fischer, C. S.1982. What do we mean by “friend”? A deductive study. Social Network3:287-306.
6.
Fiske, S. T. , and S. E. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition. New York: Random House.
7.
Fry, W. R. , I. J. Firestone, and D. L. Williams. 1983. Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose?Basic and Applied Social Psychology4(1): 1-16.
8.
Halpern, J. J. 1991. Friendship's effects on personal transactions: International perspectives. Paper presented at Stanford Center for Organizational Research, Asilomar Conference, May.
9.
Halpern, J. J. . 1992. The effect of friendship on bargaining: Experimental studies of personal business transactions. In Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, edited by J. L. Wall and L. R. Jauch, 64-68. Las Vegas, NV: Academy of Management.
10.
Kurth, S. 1970. Friendship and friendly relations. In Social relationships, edited by G. J. McCall, M. McCall, N. K. Denzin, G. Suttles, and S. B. Kurth. Chicago: Adline.
11.
Loewenstein, G. F. , L. Thompson, and M. H. Bazerman. 1989. Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(3): 426-441.
12.
MacNeil, I.1986. Exchange revisited: Individual utility and social solidarity. Ethics96:567-593.
13.
Morgan, W. R. , and J. Sawyer. 1967. Bargaining, expectations, and the preference for equality over equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6:139-149.
14.
Raiffa, H. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Boston: Harvard University Press.
15.
Roth, A. E. , and J. K. Murnighan. 1982. The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study. Econometrica50:1123-1142.
16.
Rubin, Z. 1973. Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
17.
Sahlins, M. 1974. Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
18.
Schank, R. C. , and R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Schelling, T. C.1957. Bargaining, communication, and limited war. Journal of Conflict Resolution1(1): 19-36.
20.
Schiller, R. J. , M. Boycko, and V. Korobov. 1990. Popular attitudes towards free markets: The Soviet Union and the United States compared. Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research—U.S.S.R. Institute of World Economy and International Relations Joint Conference, July 18, in Cambridge, MA.
21.
Schoeninger, D. W. , and W. D. Wood. 1969. Comparison of married and ad hoc mixed-sex dyads negotiating the division of a reward. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology5:483-499.
22.
Shapiro, E. G.1975. Effect of expectations of future interactions on reward allocations in dyads: Equity or equality?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31:873-880.
23.
Tversky, A. , and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science185:1124-1131.
