The proposition that democracies rarely fight one another has been well-substantiated by empirical research. A prominent explanation for this finding is that shared norms fostered by a democratic political culture promote peaceful conflict resolution. Joint democratic dyads allegedly have a greater propensity than other types of dyads to entrust third parties with judicial competence to settle their disputes. The results from a study of 206 dyadic disputes involving third-party intermediaries support this claim. The presence of joint democracy in dangerous, war-prone dyads has a strong positive effect on the probability of referring interstate disputes to binding third-party settlement, even when controlling for alliance bonds and geographic proximity. In addition, the more a joint democratic dyad is marked by coherent regimes or a rough parity in the distribution of military capabilities, the greater the propensity to refer disputes to binding third-party settlement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Sir Michael . 1990. NATO's role in a changing world. NATO Review38:1-6.
2.
Baker, James A. 1990a, Democracy and American diplomacy. Current Policy No. 1266. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs.
3.
Baker, James A. 1990b. U.S. foreign policy priorities and FY 1991 budget request. Current Policy No. 1245. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs.
4.
Bowett, Derek William . 1983. Contemporary developments in legal techniques in the settlement of disputes. Recueil des Cours. Vol 2. 169-235. Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff.
5.
Bremer, Stuart A.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36:309-341.
6.
Bremer, Stuart A.1993. Democracy and militarized interstate conflict, 1816-1965. International Interactions18:231-249.
7.
Brewin, Christopher . 1988. International obligations. Millennium17:321-338.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and David Lalman. 1992. War and reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Butterworth, Robert Lyle , with Margaret E. Scranton. 1976. Managing interstate conflict, 1945-74: Data with synopses. Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies.
10.
Chan, Steve . 1984. Mirror, mirror on the wall...Are the freer countries more pacific? Journal of Conflict Resolution28:617-648.
11.
Coplin, William D. , and J. Martin Rochester. 1972. The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the League of Nations, and the United Nations: A comparative empirical survey. American Political Science Review66:529-550.
12.
Darby, W. Evans . 1899. A league of peace; or, how may arbitration lead to disarmament? Paper presented at the Paris Peace Congress, reprinted by the London Peace Society.
13.
Darby, W. Evans 1904. International tribunals. 4th ed.London: J. M. Dent.
14.
Diehl, Paul F.1985. Contiguity and escalation in major power rivalries, 1816-1980. Journal of Politics47:1203-1211.
15.
Dixon, William J.1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:42-68.
16.
Domke, William K. 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Donnadieu, Léonce . 1900. Essai sur la théorie de l'equilibre, étude d'historie diplomatique et de droit international. Paris: A. Rousseau.
18.
Doyle, Michael W.1983. Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs, part I. Philosophy and Public Affairs12:205-235.
19.
Ember, Carol R. , Melvin Ember, and Bruce Russett. 1992. Peace between participatory polities: A cross-national test of the “democracies rarely fight each other” hypothesis. World Politics44:573-599.
20.
Eubanks, Rodney . 1971. International arbitration in the political sphere. Arbitration Journal26:120-146.
21.
Fiore, Pasquale . 1885. Nouveau droit international public. 2d ed.Vol. 1. Paris: Durand et Pedone-Lauriel.
22.
Fukuyama, Francis . 1991. Liberal democracy as a global phenomena. PS: Political Science and Politics24:659-664.
23.
Gebrehana, Teklewold . 1984. Arbitration: An element of international law. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
24.
Gladstone, W. E.1873. Comments in House of Commons debate on a motion to establish a general and permanent system of international arbitration. In International arbitration and the improvement of international law, 120. London: Hodder & Stroughton.Reprinted speech.
25.
Guertin, Florence . 1931. Alternatives to war. New York: Harper & Brothers.
26.
Gurr, Ted Robert , Keith Jaggers, and Will H. Moore. 1989. POLITY II codebook. Boulder: University of Colorado.
27.
Harf, James E. 1974. Inter-nation conflict resolution and national attributes. In Comparing foreign policies: Theories, findings, and methods, edited by James N. Rosenau, 305-325. New York: Halsted.
28.
International Law Commission. 1952. Report covering the work of its fourth session, 4 June-8 August. General Assembly, Official Records, Seventh Session, Supplement No. 9 (A/2163).
29.
Joffe, Josef . 1990. Tocqueville revisited: Are good democracies bad players in the game of nations? In The new democracies: Global change and U.S. policy, edited by Brad Roberts, 123-134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Kant, Immanuel . 1957. Perpetual peace. Translated by Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan.
31.
Kegley, Charles W. , and Gregory A. Raymond. 1990. When trust breaks down: Alliance norms and world politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
32.
Kugler, Jacek . 1993. Political conflict, war, and peace. In Political science: The state of the discipline, II, edited by Ada W. Finifter, 483-509. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
33.
Lave, Charles A. , and James G. March. 1975. An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.
34.
Levine, Edward P.1971. Mediation in international politics. Peace Research Society (International) Papers17:23-43.
35.
Levy, Jack S. 1989. The causes of war: A review of theories and evidence. In Behavior, society, and nuclear war, Vol. 1, edited by Philip E. Tetlock, Jo L. Husbands, Robert Jervis, Paul S. Stern, and Charles Tilly, 209-333. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Lukin, Vladimir P.1992. Our security predicament. Foreign Policy88:57-75.
37.
Maoz, Zeev , and Nasrin Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution33:3-35.
38.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1992. Alliance, contiguity, wealth, and political stability: Is the lack of conflict among democracies a statistical artifact? International Interactions17:245-267.
39.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87:624-638.
40.
Merritt, Richard L. , and Dina A. Zinnes. 1991. Democracies and war. In On measuring democracy: Its consequences and concomitants, edited by Alex Inkeles, 207-234. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
41.
Mitchell, C. R. 1988. The motives of mediation. In New approaches to international mediation, edited by C. R. Mitchell and K. Webb, 29-51. New York: Greenwood.
42.
Moore, David W.1974a. Foreign policy and empirical democratic theory. American Political Science Review68:1192-1197.
43.
Moore, David W. 1974b. Governmental and societal influences on foreign policy in open and closed nations. In Comparing foreign policies: Theories, findings, and methods, edited by James N. Rosenau, 171-199. New York: Halsted.
44.
Moore, John Bassett . 1929. International adjudications. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Morgan, T. Clifton , and Sally H. Campbell. 1991. Domestic structure, decisional constraints and war: So why Kant democracies fight? Journal of Conflict Resolution35:187-211.
46.
Morgan, T. Clifton , and Valerie L. Schwebach. 1992. Take two democracies and call me in the morning: A prescription for peace? International Interactions17:305-320.
47.
Oppenheim, L.1905. International law, a treatise. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green.
48.
Pennock, J. R. 1979. Democratic political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Pillet, Antoine . 1899. Recherches sur les droits fondamentaux des états. Paris: A. Pedone.
50.
Princen, Thomas . 1992. Intermediaries in international conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Ralston, Jackson H. 1929. International arbitration from Athens to Locarno. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52.
Ray, James Lee . 1993. War between democracies: Rare or nonexistent? International Interactions18:251-276.
53.
Raymond, Gregory A. 1980. Conflict resolution and the structure of the state system. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.
54.
Raymond, Gregory A. , and Charles W. Kegley, Jr.1985. Third party mediation and international norms: A test of two models. Conflict Management and Peace Science9:33-51.
55.
Rothstein, Robert L. 1992. Weak democracy and the prospects for peace and prosperity in the Third World. In Resolving third world conflict: Challenges for a new era, edited by Sheryl J. Brown and Kimber M. Schraub, 16-50. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
56.
Rummel, Rudolph J.1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution27:27-71.
57.
Russett, Bruce M. 1989. Democracy and peace. In Choices in world politics: Sovereignty and interdependence, edited by Bruce Russett, Harvey Starr, and Richard Stoll, 245-260. New York: W. H. Freeman.
58.
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
Russett, Bruce M. 1993. Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
Salmore, Steven A. , and Charles F. Hermann. 1969. The effect of size, development and accountability on foreign policy. Peace Research Society Papers14:15-30.
61.
Schweller, Randall L.1992. Domestic structure and preventive war: Are democracies more pacific? World Politics44:235-269.
62.
Simmel, Georg . 1955. The web of group affiliations. Translated by Reinhard Bendix. New York: Glencoe.
63.
Siverson, Randolph M. , and Juliann Emmons. 1991. Birds of a feather: Democratic political systems and alliance choices in the twentieth century. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:285-306.
64.
Siverson, Randolph M. , and Harvey Starr. 1991. The diffusion of war: A study of opportunity and willingness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
65.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1969. Formal alliances, 1816-1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research6:257-282.
66.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1976. The war-proneness of democratic regimes. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1:50-69.
67.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68.
Snyder, Glenn H. , and Paul Diesing. 1977. Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision making, and system structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Sohn, Louis B. 1983. The future of dispute settlement. In The structure and process of international law: Essays in legal philosophy, doctrine and theory, edited by R. St. J. Macdonald and Douglas M. Johnston, 1121-1146. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
70.
Stieglitz, Alexander . 1893. De l'equilibre politique, de légitimisme et du principe des nationalités. Vol. 1. Paris: A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel.
71.
Stone, Julius . 1954. Legal controls of international conflict. New York: Rinehart.
72.
Stuyt, A. 1972. Survey of international arbitration. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.
73.
Thucydides . 1951. The Peloponnesian War. New York: Random House.
74.
Touval, Saadia . 1982. The peace brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli conflict, 1948-1979. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
Vincent, Jack . 1987. Freedom and international conflict: Another look. International Studies Quarterly31:119-126.
76.
Weede, Erich . 1976. Overwhelming preponderance as a pacifying condition among contiguous Asian dyads, 1950-1969. Journal of Conflict Resolution20:395-411.
77.
Weede, Erich . 1984. Democracy and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution28:649-664.
78.
Wetter, J. Gillis . 1979. The international arbitral process: Public and private. Vol. 1. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.
79.
Wright, Quincy . 1965. A study of war. 2d ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
Young, Oran R. 1967. The intermediaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
Zimmerman, Alfred . 1939. The League of Nations and he rule of law, 1918-1935. London: Macmillan.
