Theoretical arguments and some empirical evidence suggest that war is more likely to occur between states that are geographically proximate, approximately equal in power, major powers, allied, undemocratic, economically advanced, and highly militarized than between those that are not. Bivariate analyses of these seven factors in relation to the onset of interstate war over all pairs of states in the period from 1816 to 1965 generally support these associations. However, multivariate analyses reveal some differences. In order of declining importance, the conditions that characterize a dangerous, war-prone dyad are: presence of contiguity, absence of alliance, absence of more advanced economy, absence of democratic polity, absence of overwhelming preponderance, and presence of major power. Taken together these findings suggest that our research priorities may be seriously distorted and that the idealist prescription for peace may be better than the realist one.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babst, D.1972. A force for peace. Industrial Research (April):55-58.
2.
Blainey, G. 1973. The causes of war. New York: Free Press.
3.
Blalock, H. M. 1972. Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Bremer, S. A. 1980a. National capabilities and war proneness. In The correlates of war: II. Testing some realpolitik models, edited by J. D. Singer. New York: Free Press.
5.
Bremer, S. A. 1980b. The trials of nations. In The correlates of war: II. Testing some realpolitik models, edited by J.D. Singer. New York: Free Press.
6.
Bremer, S. A. 1991. Some observations on advancing the scientific study of war. Paper presented at the workshop on Advancing the Scientific Study of War, August 27-28, Washington, DC.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.1982. Where war is likely in the next year or two. U.S. News and World Report, May 3.
9.
Chan, S.1984. Mirror, mirror on the wall... are the freer countries more pacific?Journal of Conflict Resolution28:617-648.
10.
Choucri, N. , and R. C. North. 1975. Nations in conflict: Prelude to World War I. San Francisco: Freeman.
11.
Claude, I. L., Jr. 1962. Power and international relations. New York: Random House.
12.
Diehl, P.F.1983. Arms races and escalation: A closer look. Journal of Peace Research20:205-212.
13.
Diehl, P.F.1985. Arms races to war: Testing some empirical linkages. Sociological Quarterly26:331-349.
14.
Diehl, P.F.1991. Geography and war: A review and assessment of the empirical literature. International Interactions17:11-27.
15.
Diehl, P. F. , and G. Goertz. 1988. Territorial changes and militarized conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:103-122.
16.
Dixon, W. J. 1989. Political democracy and war: A new look at an old problem. Paper presented at the 30th annual convention of the International Studies Association, March 28-April 1, London, England.
17.
Domke, W. K. 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Doyle, M. W.1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review80:1151-1169.
19.
Duvall, R. 1976. An appraisal of the methodological and statistical procedures of the correlates of war project. In Quantitative international politics: An appraisal, edited by F. W. Hoole and D. A. Zinnes. New York: Praeger.
20.
Garham, D.1976. Dyadic international war, 1816-1965: The role of power parity and geographical proximity. Western Political Quarterly29:231-242.
21.
Gilpin, R. 1981. War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Gleditsch, N. P. , and J. D. Singer. 1975. Distance and international war, 1816-1965. In Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association fifth general conference, edited by M. R. Khan. Oslo: International Peace Research Association.
23.
Gochman, C. S. 1990a. The geography of conflict: Militarized interstate disputes since 1816. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Washington, DC, April 10-14.
24.
Gochman, C. S. 1990b. Capability-driven disputes. In Prisoners of war: Nation-states in the modern era, edited by C. S. Gochman and A. N. Sabrosky. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
Gochman, C. S.1991. Interstate metrics: Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and measuring the geographic proximity of states since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions17:93-112.
26.
Goertz, G. , and P. F. Diehl. 1990. Territorial changes and recurring conflict. In Prisoners of war: Nation-states in the modern era, edited by C. S. Gochman and A. N. Sabrosky. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
27.
Greene, William H. 1990. Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.
28.
Gurr, T. R. , K. Jaggers, and W. H. Moore. 1989. Polity II. DDIR Update3(4): 1-7.
29.
Holsti, O. R. , P. T. Hopmann, and J. D. Sullivan. 1985. Unity and disintegration in international alliances. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
30.
King, G.1987. Presidential appointments to the Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly15:373-386.
31.
King, G. 1989. Unifying political methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Maoz, Z. , and N. Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution33:3-36.
34.
Morgan, T. C. , and S. H. Campbell. 1991. Domestic structure, decisional constraints and war behavior: So why Kant democracies fight?Journal of Conflict Resolution35: 187-211.
35.
Morgan, T. C. , and V. L. Schwebach. 1991. Domestic structure and war. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 29-September 1.
36.
Most, B. A. , and H. Starr. 1989. Inquiry, logic and international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
37.
Mueller, J. 1989. Retreat from doomsday. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Organski, A.F.K. 1968. World politics. 2d ed.New York: Knopf.
39.
Rasler, K. A. , and W. R. Thompson. 1989. War and state making: The shaping of the global powers. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
40.
Ray, J. L. 1990. Friends as foes: International conflict and wars between formal allies. In Prisoners of war: Nation-states in the modern era, edited by C. S. Gochman and A. N. Sabrosky. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
41.
Richardson, L. F. 1960. Statistics of deadly quarrels. Pittsburgh, PA: Boxwood.
42.
Rummel, R. J. 1968. The relationship between national attributes and foreign conflict behavior. In Quantitative international politics: Insights and evidence, edited by J. D. Singer. New York: Free Press.
43.
Rummel, R. J. 1972. The dimensions of nations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Rummel, R. J.1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution27:27-72.
45.
Russett, B. 1990. Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Russett, B. , and R. J. Monsen. 1975. Bureaucracy and polyarchy as predictors of performance: A cross-national examination. Comparative Political Studies8:5-31.
47.
Siverson, R. M. , and P. F. Diehl. 1989. Arms races, the conflict spiral, and the onset of war. In Handbook of war studies, edited by M. I. Midlarsky. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
48.
Siverson, R. M. , and H. Starr. 1990. Opportunity, willingness, and the diffusion of war. American Political Science Review84:47-67.
49.
Siverson, R. M. , and H. Starr. 1991. The diffusion of war: A study of opportunity and willingness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50.
Small, M. , and J. D. Singer. 1969. Formal alliances, 1816-1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research6:257-282.
51.
Small, M. , and J. D. Singer1976. The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816-1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1:50-68.
52.
Small, M. , and J. D. Singer 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
Starr, H. , and B. A. Most. 1976. The substance and study of borders in international relations research. International Studies Quarterly20:581-620.
54.
Starr, H. , and B. A. Most. 1978. A return journey: Richardson, “frontiers,” and wars in the 1946-1965 era. Journal of Conflict Resolution22:441-467.
55.
Sullivan, M. P. 1990. Power in contemporary international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
56.
Terrell, L. M.1977. Attribute differences among neighboring states and their levels of foreign conflict behavior. International Journal of Group Tensions7:89-108.
57.
Wallace, M. D.1979. Arms races and escalation: Some new evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution23:3-16.
58.
Wallace, M. D.1981. Old nails in new coffins: The para bellum hypothesis revisited. Journal of Peace Research18:91-95.
59.
Wallace, M. D.1982. Armaments and escalation: Two competing hypotheses. International Studies Quarterly26:37-56.
60.
Wallace, M. D. 1990. Racing redux: The arms race-escalation debate revisited. In Prisoners of war: Nation-states in the modern era, edited by C. S. Gochman and A. N. Sabrosky. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
61.
Waltz, K. N. 1959. Man, the state and war. New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
Weede, E.1976. Overwhelming preponderance as a pacifying condition among contiguous Asian dyads, 1950-1969. Journal of Conflict Resolution20:395-412.
63.
Weede, E.1980. Arms races and escalation: Some persisting doubts. Journal of Conflict Resolution24:285-287.
64.
Weede, E.1984. Democracy and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution28:649-664.
65.
Wright, Q. 1965. A study of war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
