The Role of Caucusing in Community Mediation

Abstract

A theory is presented about the functions of caucusing (private meetings between the mediator and disputant) in mediation. Empirical results that confirm and extend a number of propositions from the theory are also presented. Two coders, content analyzing both mediator and disputant behavior, observed 51 hearings at the Dispute Settlement Center of Western New York. Results indicated that disputants in caucus sessions employed less direct hostility, provided more information, and proposed more new alternatives than in joint sessions. Mediators, in parallel fashion, were more likely to request information and to challenge the disputants to come up with new alternatives. Mediators also exhibited more freedom to violate the neutrality norms during caucus sessions, giving greater support to the side that originally filed the complaint. These results support the use of caucusing as a route to issue identification and problem solving. However, other results showed that disputants were especially likely to boost their own position and put the other party down during caucus sessions, suggesting that mediators must be wary of what they learn from one party when the other is out of the room.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bercovitch, J. (1984) Social Conflicts and Third Parties: Strategies of Conflict Resolution. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Blades, J. (1984) “Mediation: an old art revisited.” Mediation Q. 3: 59-95.

Burton, J. W. (1982) Dear Survivors: Planning After Nuclear Holocaust. London: Frances Printer.

Carnevale, P. , S. Beckman , and S. Bona (1984) “Cognitive elements of cooperation and competition: categorization and functional fixedness.” Submitted to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

De Reuck, A.V.S. (1983) “A theory of conflict resolution by problem solving.” Man, Environment, Space and Time 3: 1-14.

Evarts, W. R. , J. L. Greenstone , G. J. Kirkpatrick , and S. C. Leviton (1983) Winning Through Accommodation: The Mediator's Handbook. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Harnett, D. L. and J. A. Wall, Jr. (1983) “Aspiration/competitive effects on the mediation of bargaining,” pp. 8-21 in R. Tietz (ed.) Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Haynes, J. M. (1981) Divorce Mediation: A Practical Guide for Therapists. New York: Springer.

Kelman, H. C. and S. P. Cohen (1979) “Reduction of international conflict: an interactional approach,” pp. 288-303 in W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

10.

Kerr, C. (1954) “Industrial conflict and its mediation.” Amer. J. of Sociology 60: 230-245.

11.

Kolb, D. (1983) The Mediators. Cambridge: MIT Press.

12.

Kolb, D. (1985) “To be a mediator: expressive tactics in mediation.” J. of Social Issues 41: 11-26.

13.

Kressel, K. (1972) Labor Mediation: An Exploratory Survey. Albany, NY: Association of Labor Mediation Agencies.

14.

Markowitz, J. R. and P. S. Engram (1983) “Mediation in labor disputes and divorces: a comparative analysis.” Mediation Q. 2: 67-78.

15.

McGillis, D. (1981) “Conflict resolution outside the courts,” pp. 243-262 in L. Bickman (ed.) Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

16.

Pruitt, D. G. (1981) Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

17.

Pruitt, D. G. , and J. Z. Rubin (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. New York: Random House.

18.

Shapiro, D. , R. Drieghe , and J. Brett (1985) “Mediator behavior and the outcome of mediation.” J. of Social Issues 41: 101-114.

19.

Sheppard, B. H. (1984) “Third party conflict intervention: a procedural framework.” Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 141-190.

20.

Silbey, S. S. and S. E. Merry (1986) “Mediator settlement strategies.” Law and Policy 8: 7-32.

21.

Sillars, A. L. (1981) “Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution,” pp. 279-305 in J. H. Harvey et al. (eds.) New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

22.

Syna, H. (1985) “Conflict resolution strategies and blaming patterns in conflicts of intimate couples.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.

23.

Syna, H. , M. van Slyck , N. Mcgillicuddy , T. Nochajski , and D. G. Pruitt (1983) “Effectiveness of community mediation for conflict resolution: an evaluation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.

24.

Vallone, R. P. , L. Ross , and M. R. Lepper (1985) “The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 577-585.

25.

Witty, C. J. (1980) Mediation and Society: Conflict Management in Lebanon. New York: Academic Press.