Normative and Instrumental Functions of Equity Criteria in Individual Choices of the Input-Payoff Distribution Pattern

Abstract

This article examines how utility and equity criteria interact to account for individual choices between alternative combinations of inputs and payoffs in a group. Two kinds of utility criteria are assumed: One is purely individualistic (self-interest) and the other includes consequences of one's choice for other members of a group (cooperation, competition). Three criteria of equity and justice are taken into account: equality of payoffs, the right payoff (according to contribution), and relative equity. An experiment was designed to make a subject choose from each pair of a set of 16 alternative distributions of two levels of inputs and payoffs for himself and a partner who was unknown to him. The subjects' choices turned out to be basically consistent, the number of circular triads being much below chance expectation. The utilitarian criteria were more commonly applied than the egalitarian ones, with predominance of self-interest and cooperation. However, 68% of the subjects used a mixture of rules similar to maximin, whereby both the Rawlsian claim of distributive justice and the Pareto-optimal demands were partly satisfied. The criteria of equity and justice operated the impersonal, normative way only up to a certain level of the subjects' losses. They were also used interchangeably to justify the subjects' own gains and to prevent their partners from gaining more than they did.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965) “Inequity in social exchange.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2: 267-299.

Adams, J. S. and S. Freeman (1976) “Equity theory revisited: comments and annotated bibliography.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2.

Arrow, K. J. (1978) “Values and collective decision making,” pp. 215-232 in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bergson, A. (1966) “On the concept of social welfare,” pp. 1-49 in A. Bergson , Essays in Normative Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

Cook, C. H. and K. A. Hegtvedt (1983) “Distributive justice, equity and equality.” Annual Rev. of Sociology 9: 217-241.

Coombs, C. H. (1967) “Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 6: 85-91.

Dahl, R. A. (1979) “Procedural democracy,” pp. 97-133 in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

Eckhoff, T. (1974) Justice: Its Determinants in Social Interactions. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Press.

Elster, J. (1983) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

10.

Festinger, L. (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.

11.

Harsanyi, Y. (1955) “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” J. of Pol. Economy 63: 303-329.

12.

Kelley, H. H. and J. W. Thibaut (1978) Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.

13.

Kendall, M. G. (1955) Rank Correlation Methods. New York: Hafner.

14.

Lane, I. M. and L. A. Messe (1972) “Distribution of insufficient, sufficient and oversufficient rewards: a clarification of equity theory.” J. of Personal and Social Psychology 21: 228-233.

15.

Lawler, E. E. (1975) “An experimental study of factors affecting the mobilization of revolutionary coalitions.” Sociometry 38: 163-179.

16.

Leventhal, G. S. and D. Anderson (1970) “Self-interest and the maintenance of equity.” J. of Personal and Social Psychology 15: 57-62.

17.

Mccrimmon, K. R. and D. M. Messick (1976) “A framework for social motives.” Behavioral Sci. 21: 86-100.

18.

Messick, D. M. and W. B. Thorngate (1967) “Relative gain maximization in experimental games.” J. of Experimental Social Psychology 3: 85-101.

19.

Radzicki, J. (1977) “Technique of conjoint measurement of subjective value of own and other's gains.” Polish Psych. Bulletin 7: 179-186.

20.

Rawls, J. A. (1978) “Distributive justice,” pp. 58-82 in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

21.

Robinson, R. V. and W. Bell (1978) “Equality, success and social justice in England and the United States.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 43: 125-143.

22.

Surażska, W. (1985) “Self-interest versus equity: Polish-Norwegian comparative study.” (unpublished)

23.

Weick, K. E. and B. Nesset (1968) “Preferences among forms of equity.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 3: 400-416.