Victims of Groupthink

Abstract

An important theory in the study of small group decision making is groupthink, developed by Irving Janis. Groupthink refers to a process by which a small group of decision makers subjected to intense stress may become more concerned with achieving concurrence among their members than in arriving at carefully considered decisions. In this study, Janis's theory is applied to the 1977 gymnasium controversy at Kent State University where trustees decided to build an addition to the school's gymnasium on part of the area where students and Ohio National Guard members confronted each other just before the tragic shootings of May 4, 1970. Despite opposition from the student body and faculty, large-scale protest activities, massive arrests, and numerous third party efforts to resolve the conflict, the trustees not only refused to alter their decision but also refused even to reconsider their decision. A detailed analysis of Janis's theory reveals that each major condition of the theory was present in the conflict and that the trustees were indeed victims of groupthink.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akron Beacon Journal (1977) May 5 to August 25.

Begala, J. (1977) Personal Interview, November 4.

Bukoff, A. and P. Watkins (1978) “The false consensus effect in a real life conflict situation: the Kent State gym controversy.” Presented at the 1978 Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association.

Courtright, J. A. (1978) “A laboratory investigation of groupthink.” Communications Monographs, 45 (August): 229-246.

Flowers, M. L. (1977) “A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 12: 888-896.

Fodor, E. M. and T. Smith (1982) “The power motive as an influence on group decision making.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 1: 178-185.

Green, D. and E. Conolley (1974) “ `Groupthink' and Watergate.” Presented at the 1974 Meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Janis, I. L. (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Janis, I. L. and L. Mann (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

11.

Kent-Ravenna Record Courier (1977) May 5 to September 2.

12.

Lewis, J. M. (1978) “The May 4th coalition and Tent City: a norm oriented movement,” pp. 149-158 in T. R. Hensley and J. M. Lewis (eds.) Kent State and May 4th: A Social Science Perspective. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.

13.

Longley, J. and D. G. Pruitt (1980) “Groupthink: A Critique of Janis's Theory.” Rev. of Personality and Social Psychology 1: 74-93.

14.

Manz, C. C. and H. P. Sims, Jr. (1982) “Potential for Groupthink in Autonomous Work Groups.” Human Relations Minutes of the Kent State University Board of Trustees, 1963-1977.

15.

Ohio Legislative Service Commission (1977) “Procedures for Site Change of a State Construction Project.” Columbus, Ohio.

16.

Raven, B. H. and J. Z. Raven (1974) “The Nixon group.” J. of Social Issues 30: 297-320.

17.

Raven, B. H. and J. Z. Raven (1977) Social Psychology: People in Groups. New York: Wiley.

18.

Schwartz, H. and J. Jacobs (1979) Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. New York: The Free Press.

19.

Semmel, A. K. and D. Minnix (1978) “Group Dynamics and Risk-Taking: An Experimental Examination.” Experimental Study of Politics, 6, 3 (March): 1-33.

20.

Stocker-Kreichgauer, G. , I. L. Janis , I. D. Steiner , and H. Brandstatter (1982) “Groupthink,” in H. Brandstatter , J. H. Davis , and G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (eds.) Group Decision Making. New York: Academic.

21.

Tetlock, P. E. (1979) “Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1314-1324.