The tit-for-tat strategy in iterated prisoners' dilemma games is examined in the presence of disturbances. It is shown that performance deteriorates drastically at arbitrarily low noise levels. The situation may be remedied by introducing some unconditional generosity. This may be done without exposing oneself to the risk of exploitation by the other party.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Axelrod, R. (1980a) “Effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma.”J. of Conflict Resolution24: 3-25.
2.
Axelrod, R. (1980b) “More effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma.”J. of Conflict Resolution24: 379-403.
3.
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.