This article subjects the following propositions to systematic tests against the quantitative literature: that violence does not occur between libertarian states; that the more libertarian two states are the less violence there is between them; and that the more libertarian a state is the less it will be involved in foreign and domestic violence. A comprehensive survey of the literature uncovered 67 relevant analyses. An evaluation, scoring, and weighting of these analyses showed that they significantly support the propositions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, I. and C. T. Morris (1973) Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Adelman, I. and C. T. Morris (1967) Society, Politics and Economic Development: A Quantitative Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
3.
Alcock, N (1976) “Towards a causal model of violence.”Peace Research8 (July): 91-103.
4.
Alcock, N (1975) “The political dimensions of compassion.”Peace Research7 (January): 1-23.
5.
Alcock, N (1974) “Freedom and equality among nations.”Peace Research5 (July): 53-67.
6.
Alcock, N and W. Eckhardt (1974) “Comparisons between the attitudes and behaviors of individuals and nations.”Peace Research5 (April): 33-44.
7.
Anderson, C. W. and B. A. Nesvold (1972) “A Skinnerian analysis of conflict behavior.”Amer. Behavioral Scientist15: 883-910.
8.
Babst, D. V. (1972) “A force for peace.”Industrial Research (April): 55-58.
9.
Banks, A. (1972) “Correlates of democratic performance.”Comparative Politics4 (January): 217-230.
10.
Barringer, R. E. (1972) War: Patterns of Conflict. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11.
Broch, T. and J. Galtung (1966) “Belligerence among the primitives.”J. of Peace Research1: 33-45.
12.
Bwy, D. P. (1972) “Political instability in Latin America: the cross-cultural test of a causal model,” pp. 223-241 in I. K. Feierabend and T. R. Gurr (eds.) Anger, Violence, and Politics: Theories and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Cattell, R. B. (1953) “A quantitative analysis of the changes in the culture patterns of Great Britain, 1837-1937, by P-technique.”Acta Psychologica9: 99-121.
14.
Cattell, R. B. and R. Gorsuch (1965) “The definition and measurement of national morale and morality.”J. of Social Psychology67: 77-96.
15.
Chan, S. (1984) “Mirror, mirror on the wall...: are the freer countries more pacific?”J. of Conflict Resolution28 (December): 617-648.
16.
Cooper, M. N. (1974) “A reinterpretation of the causes of turmoil: the effects of culture and modernity.”Comparative Pol. Studies7 (October): 267-291.
17.
Cutright, P. (1963) “National political development: measurement and analysis.”Amer. Soc. Rev.28: 253-263.
18.
East, M. A. and P. M. Gregg (1967) “Factors influencing cooperation and conflict in the international system.”Int. Studies Q.2 (September): 244-269.
19.
East, M. A. and C. F. Hermann (1974) “Do nation-types account for foreign policy behavior?,” pp. 269-303 in J. N. Rosenau (ed.) Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings, and Methods. New York: Halsted Press.
20.
Eckhardt, W. (1975) “Primitive militarism.”J. of Peace Research12, 1: 55-62.
21.
Eckhardt, W. (1969) “The factor of militarism.”J. of Peace Research2: 123-132.
22.
Eckhardt, W. and C. Young (1977) Governments Under Fire: Civil Conflict and Imperialism. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
23.
Eckhardt, W. and C. Young (1974) “A prliminary report on civil conflict and inequality.”Peace Research5 (April): 45-50.
24.
Fabbro, D. (1978) “Peaceful societies: an introduction.”J. of Peace Research15 (No. 1): 67-83.
25.
Feierabend, I. K. and R. L. Feierabend (1973) “Violent consequences of violence,” pp. 187-219 in H. Hirsch and D. C. Perry (eds.) Violence as Politics: A Series of Original Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Feierabend, I. K. and R. L. Feierabend (1971) “The relationship of systematic frustration, political coercion, and political instability: a cross-national analysis,” pp. 417-440 in J. V. Gillespie and B. A. Nesvold (eds.) Macro-Quantitative Analysis: Conflict, Development, and Democratization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Feierabend, I. K. , R. L. Feierabend and B. A. Nesvold (1969) “Social change and political violence: cross-national patterns,” pp. 632-687 in H. D. Graham and T. R. Gurr (eds.) Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Bantam Books.
28.
Feierabend, I. K. with R. L. Feierabend and B. Nesvold (1973) “The comparative study of revolution and violence.”Comparative Politics5 (April): 393-424.
29.
Feierabend, R. L. and I. K. Feierabend (1972) “Appendix: invitation to further research—designs, data, and methods,” pp. 369-416 in I. K. Feierabendet al., (eds.) Anger, Violence, and Politics: Theories and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Flanigan, W. H. and E. Fogelman (1970) “Patterns of political violence in comparative perspective.”Comparative Politics3 (October): 1-20.
31.
Goldman, K. (1971) International Norms and War between States: Three Studies in International Politics. Stokholm, Sweden: Läromedelsförlagen.
32.
Gregg, P. and A. S. Banks (1965) “Dimensions of political systems: factor analysis of a cross-polity survey.”The Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.59 (September): 602-613.
33.
Gurr, T. R. (1979a) “Political protest and rebellion in the 1960s: the United States in world perspective,” pp. 49-76 in H. D. Graham and T. R. Gurr (eds.) Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Gurr, T. R. (1979b) “Some characteristics of political terrorism in the 1960s,” pp. 23-49 in M. Stohl (ed.) The Politics of Terror: A Reader in Theory and Practice. New York: Dekker.
35.
Gurr, T. R. (1971) “The conditions of civil violence: first tests of a causal model,” pp. 187-249 in J. V. Gillespie and B. A. Nesvold (eds.) Macro-Quantitative Analysis: Conflict, Development, and Democratization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Gurr, T. R. (1969) “A comparative study of civil strife,” pp. 572-632 in H. D. Graham and T. R. Gurr (eds.) Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Bantam Books.
37.
Gurr, T. R. and M. I. Lichbach (1979) “Forecasting domestic political conflict,” pp. 153-193 in J. D. Singer and M. Wallace (eds.) To Augur Well: Early Warning Indicators in World Politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Haas, M. (1974) International Conflict. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
39.
Hazlewood, L. A. (1973) “Externalizing systematic stresses: international conflict as adaptive behavior,” pp. 148-190 in J. Wilkenfeld (ed.) Conflict Behavior and Linkage Politics. New York: David McKay.
40.
Hibbs, D. A. Jr. (1973) Mass Political Violence. New York: John Wiley.
41.
Markus, G. B. and B. A. Nesvold (1972) “Governmental coerciveness and political instability: an exploratory study of cross-national patterns.”Comparative Pol. Studies8 (July): 231-244.
42.
Melko, M. (1973) 52 Peaceful Societies. Oakville, Ontario: Canadian Peace Research Institute Press.
43.
Midlarsky, M. I. (1975) On War: Political Violence in the International System. New York: Free Press.
44.
Midlarsky, M. I. and S. T. Thomas (1975) “Domestic social structure and international warfare,” pp. 530-548 in M. A. Nettleship, R. Dalegivens, and A. Nettleship (eds.) War, Its Causes and Correlates. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
45.
Nesvold, B. A. (1971) “Scalogram analysis of political violence,” pp. 167-186 in J. V. Gillespie and B. A. Nesvold (eds.) Macro-Quantitative Analysis: Conflict, Development, and Democratization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46.
Orbell, J. M. and B. M. Rutherford (1973) “Can Leviathan make the life of man less solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short?”British J. of Pol. Sci.3: 383-407.
47.
Otterbein, K. F. (1970) The Evolution of War: A Cross-Cultural Study. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
48.
Otterbein, K. F. (1968) “Internal war: a cross-cultural study.”Amer. Anthropologist70: 277-289.
49.
Phillips, W. and D. R. Hall (1970) “The importance of governmental structure as a taxonomic scheme for nations.”Comparative Pol. Studies3 (April): 63-89.
50.
Rosenau, J. N. and G. D. Hoggard (1974) “Foreign policy behavior in dyadic relationships: testing a pre-theoretical extension,” pp. 117-149 in J. N. Rosenau (ed.) Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings, and Methods. New York: Halsted Press.
51.
Rummel, R. J. (1984) “Libertarianism, violence within states, and the polarity principle.”Comparative Politics16 (July): 443-462.
52.
Rummel, R. J. (1983a) “Libertarianism and international violence.”J. of Conflict Resolution27 (March): 27-71.
53.
Rummel, R. J. (1983b) Social Field Theory, Libertarianism and Violence. Honolulu: Department of Political Science, University of Hawaii.
54.
Rummel, R. J. (1981) Understanding Conflict and War, Volume 5: The Just Peace. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Rummel, R. J. (1979a) National Attributes and Behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Rummel, R. J. (1979b) Understanding Conflict and War, Volume 4: War, Power, Peace. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57.
Rummel, R. J. (1976) Understanding Conflict and War, Volume 2: The Conflict Helix. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Rummel, R. J. (1975-1981) Understanding Conflict and War (Vols. 1-5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
59.
Rummel, R. J. (1972a) Dimensions of Nations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60.
Rummel, R. J. (1972b) “U.S. foreign relations: conflict, cooperation, and attribute distances,” pp. 71-113 in B. Russett (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Rummel, R. J. (1970) Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
62.
Rummel, R. J. (1963) “Dimensions of conflict behavior within and between nations.”General Systems Yearbook of the Society for General Systems Research8: 1-50.
63.
Russett, B. M. and R. J. Monsen (1975) “Bureaucracy and polyarchy as predictors of performance: a cross-national examination.”Comparative Politics8 (April): 5-31.
64.
Schwerin, E. W. (1977) “U.S. foreign relations for 1963,” pp. 301-314 in R. J. Rummel (ed.) Field Theory Evolving. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65.
Singer, J. D. and M. Small (1972) The Wages of War 1816-1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: John Wiley.
66.
Small, M. and J. D. Singer (1976) “The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816-1965.”The Jerusalem J. of Int. Relations1 (Summer): 50-69.
67.
Sorokin, P. (1957) Social and Cultural Dynamics. Boston: Porter Sargent.
68.
Sorokin, P. (1937-1941) Social and Cultural Dynamics (Vols. 1-4). Boston: Porter Sargent.
69.
Textor, R. B. (1967) A Cross-Cultural Summary. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
70.
Thomas, H. (1979) A History of the World. New York: Harper & Row.
71.
Tilly, C. , L. Tilly, and R. Tilly (1975) The Rebellious Century 1830-1930. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
72.
Vincent, J. E. (1979) Project Theory: Interpretations and Policy Relevance. Washington, D C: Univ. Press of America.
73.
Weede, E. (1984) “Democracy and war involvement.”J. of Conflict Resolution28 (December): 649-664.
74.
Weede, E. (1970) “Research communication: conflict behavior of nation-states.”J. of Peace Research3: 229-235.
75.
Wiberg, H. (1982) “Review essay: Rudolph J. Rummel: Understanding Conflict and War Vols 1-5.”J. of Peace Research19, 4: 369-386.
76.
Wright, Q. (1942) A Study of War (Vols. 1 and 2). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
77.
Yough, S. N. (1981) “Modernization, institutionalization, and political violence: a cross-national study.”J. of East Asian Affairs1 (January): 1-48.
78.
Zinnes, D. A. and J. Wilkenfeld (1971) “An analysis of foreign conflict behavior of nations,” pp. 167-213 in W. F. Hanrieder (ed.) Comparative Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays. New York: David McKay.
