Each of the social sciences provides a different explanation of conflict about the very existence of a political regime. This article reviews a variety of theories hypothesizing that such conflicts are caused by social conditions such as religion, absence of modernity, class relations and material prosperity, and generational differences. Implicitly each suggests that political conflicts may be reduced or removed as a byproduct of social changes involving secularization, modernization, economic change, or generational change. The theories are tested with two sets of survey evidence from Northern Ireland, a society of particularly intense political conflict. The tests show that support for political conflict about the regime cannot be reduced to an explanation in terms of social conditions. Containing or resolving the political conflict requires explicitly political actions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnes, S. H. , M. Kaase, et al. (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Bell, J. B. (1976) “The chroniclers of violence in Northern Ireland: a tragedy in endless acts.”Rev. of Politics36: 521-543.
3.
Butler, D. and D. Stokes (1974) Political Change in Britain. New York: Macmillan.
4.
CMND. 8541 (1982) Northern Ireland: a Framework for Devolution. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
5.
Dahrendorf, R. (1967) Conflict After Class. London: Longmans.
6.
Darby, J. (1976) Conflict in Northern Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
7.
Flora, P. (1975) Quantitative Historical Sociology. Current Sociology23; 2-2.
8.
Glock, C. Y. and R. Stark (1968) American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
9.
Gurr, T. (1974) “Persistence and change in political systems, 1800-1971.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.68: 1482-1504.
10.
Gurr, T. (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
11.
Hanushek, E. A. and J. E. Jackson (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.
12.
Hechter, M. (1975) Internal Colonialism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Hertel, B. R. (1976) “Minimising error variance introduced by missing data routines in survey analysis.”Soc. Methods and Research4: 459-475.
14.
Huntington, S. P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
15.
Kim, J. O. and C. W. Mueller (1978) Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Kmenta, J. (1971) Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.
17.
Lijphart, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
18.
Lijphart, A. (1974) “The Northern Ireland problem: cases, theories and solutions.”British J. of Pol. Sci.5: 83-106.
19.
Lipset, S. M. (1964) “The changing class structure and contemporary European politics.”Daedalus93: 271-303.
20.
McAllister, I. (1982) “United Kingdom nationalism: one nationalism or three?” pp. 202-223 in P. Madgwick and R. Rose (eds.) The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics. New York: Macmillan.
21.
O'Connor, J. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's.
22.
Olson, M. (1963) “Rapid growth as a destabilising force.”J. of Economic History23: 529-552.
23.
Orridge, A. (1981) “Uneven development and nationalism.”Pol. Studies29: 1-15, 181-190.
24.
Page, E. C. (1978) “Michael Hechter's internal colonial thesis: some theoretical and methodological problems.”European J. of Pol. Research6: 295-317.
25.
Palley, C. (1981) “Ways forward: the constitutional option,” pp. 183-206 in David Watt (ed.) The Constitution of Northern Ireland. London: Heinemann.
26.
Pollock, L. and I. Mcallister (1980) A Bibliography of United Kingdom Politics. University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, vol. 3. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
27.
Poulantzas, N. (1974) Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.
28.
Rabushka, A. and K. A. Shepsle (1972) Politics in Plural Societies: a Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
29.
Rose, R. (1982) “Is the United Kingdom a state? Northern Ireland as a test case,” pp. 100-136 in P. Madgwick and R. Rose (eds.) The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Rose, R. (1976) Northern Ireland: A Time of Choice. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
31.
Rose, R. (1971) Governing Without Consensus. London: Faber.
32.
Rose, R. (1969) “Dynamic tendencies in the authority of regimes.”World Politics21: 602-628.
33.
Rose, R. and I. Mcallister (1981) United Kingdom Facts. New York: Macmillan.
34.
Rose, R. and P. Mair (1978) Is There a Concurring Majority About Northern Ireland? University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, 22. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
35.
Russell, J. (1974) Socialization into Conflict. Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde. (unpublished)
36.
Sartori, G. (1969) “From the sociology of politics to political sociology,” in S. M. Lipset (ed.) Politics and the Social Sciences. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
37.
Skocpol, T. (1976) “Explaining revolutions: in quest of a social structural approach,” pp. 155-175 in L. A. Coser and O. N. Larsen (eds.) The Uses of Controversy in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
38.
Stewart, A. T. Q. (1977) The Narrow Ground: Aspects of Ulster, 1609-1969. London: Faber & Faber.
39.
Swift, J. (1976) Gulliver's Travels and Other Writings (1726). London: Oxford Univ. Press.
40.
Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
41.
Tilly, C. (1975) “Revolutions and collective violence.” pp. 483-555 in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science; vol. 3. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
Weber, M. (1947) From Max Weber (H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
Whyte, J. (1976) “Recent writing on Northern Ireland.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 592-596.
