In response to the empirical and theoretical weaknesses of the older social stress or deprivation theories of social movements, a new general theory of social movements—resource mobilization theory—has become increasingly popular. One of the most basic points of disagreement between theorists accepting one or the other general perspective involves the extent to which the development and growth of a social movement can be attributed to the preconditions of social stress or some form of deprivation. This article begins by describing how the two perspectives are indirectly rooted in differeing paradigms of social organization, which leads to divergent assumptions about the nature of social conflict and social order. Next, theoretical and empirical problems contained in each perspective are shown to be partially related to these assumptions. Finally, a continuum describing “movements of crisis” and “movements of affluence” is constructed to suggest that the structural conditions inviting social movement activity are varied. When such variance is recognized, we find there is a place for both theories in the complex field of study, though deprivation theories especially face many continuing problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alves, W. and P. Rossi (1978) “Who should get what? fairness judgements of distribution of earnings.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 541-564.
2.
Bell, W. and R. V. Robinson (1980) “Cognitive maps of class and racial inequalities in England and the United States.”Amer. J. of Sociology86: 320-349.
3.
Bell, W. and R. V. Robinson (1978) “An index of evaluated equality: measuring conceptions of social justice in England and the United States,” in Richard Tomasson (ed.) Comparative Studies in Sociology, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4.
Berk, R. (1974) “A gaming approach to crowd behavior.”Amer. Soc. Rev.39: 355-373.
5.
Berkowitz, L. (1978) “Whatever happened to the frustration-aggression hypothesis?”Amer. Behavioral Scientist21: 691-706.
6.
Bottomore, T. B. (1966) Class in Modern Society. New York: Vintage.
7.
Carroll, M. (1975) “Revitalization movements and social structure: some quantitative tests.”Amer. Soc. Rev.40: 389-401.
8.
Coser, L. (1967) Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
9.
Coser, L. (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
10.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11.
Davies, J. (1969) “The J-curve of rising and declining satisfactions as cause of some great revolutions and a contained rebellion,” pp. 671-709 in High Davis Graham and Ted Gurr (eds.) Violence in America. New York: Signet.
12.
Davies, J.“Toward a theory of revolution.”Aatloc. Rev.27: 5-19.
13.
Della Fave, L. R. (1980) “The meek shall not inherit the earth: self-evaluation and the legitimacy of stratification.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 955-971.
14.
Della Fave, L. R. (1974) “On the structure of egalitarianism.”Social Problems22: 199-213.
15.
Fireman, B. and W. Gamson (1979) “Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective,” in Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.) The Dynamics of Social Movements. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
16.
Frendrich, J. (1977) “Keeping the faith or pursuing the good life: a study of the consequences of participation in the civil rights movement.”Amer. Soc. Rev.42: 144-157.
17.
Gamson, W. (1975) The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
18.
Gerlach, L. and V. Hine (1970) People, Power, and Change: Movements of Social Transformation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
19.
Giddens, A. (1973) The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.
20.
Goldstone, J. (1980) “The weakness of organization: a new look at Gamson's strategy of social protest.”Amer. J. of Sociology85: 1017-1042.
21.
Granovetter, M. (1978) “Threshhold models of collective behavior.”Amer. J. of Sociology83: 1420-1443.
22.
Gurr, T. (1973) “The revolution-social-change nexus.”Comparative Politics5: 359-392.
23.
Gurr, T. (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
24.
Jasso, G. and P. Rossi (1977) “Distributive justice and earned income.”Amer. Soc. Rev.42: 639-651.
25.
Jenkins, J. C. and C. Perrow (1977) “Insurgency of the powerless: farm worker movements (1946-1972).”Amer. Soc. Rev.42: 249-268.
26.
Johnson, C. (1966) Revolutionary Change. Boston: Little, Brown.
27.
Kerbo, H. R. (forthcoming) Social Stratification and Inequality: Class Conflict in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Korpi, W. (1974) “Conflict, power, and relative deprivation.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.68: 1569-1578.
29.
Kronus, C. (1977) “Mobilizing voluntary association into a social movement: the case of environmental quality.”Soc. Q.18: 267-283.
30.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
31.
Marwell, G. and R. Ames (1979) “Experiments on the provision of public goods: resources, interest, group size, and the free rider problem.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 1335-1361.
32.
McCarthy, J. D. and M. Zald (1977) “Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory.”Amer. J. of Sociology82: 1212-1214.
33.
Miliband, R. (1969) The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
34.
Mills, C. W. (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
35.
Moore, B., Jr. (1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36.
Oberschall, A. (1973) Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
38.
Perrow, C. (1979) “The sixties observed,” in Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.) The Dynamic of Social Movements. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
39.
Piven, F. F. and R. Cloward (1977) Poor Peoples' Movements: Why they Succeed, Why they Fail. New York: Pantheon.
40.
Robinson, R. and W. Bell (1978) “Equality, success, and social injustice in England and the United States.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 125-143.
41.
Salert, B. (1976) Revolutions and Revolutionaries. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
42.
Salisbury, H. (1977) Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions 1905-1917. Garden City, Doubleday.
43.
Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
44.
Skocpol, T. (1978) “Review of `the Russian revolution: a study in mass mobilization,' by John Keep.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 194-198.
45.
Smelser, N. (1963) A Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.
46.
Snyder, D. (1978) “Collective violence.”J. of Conflict Resolution22: 499-534.
47.
Snyder, D. (1975) “Institutional setting and industrial conflict: comparative analysis of France, Italy, and the United States.”Amer. Soc. Rev.40: 259-178.
48.
Snyder, D. and W. Kelly (1979) “Strategies for investigating violence and social change: illustrations from analyses of racial disorders and implications for resource mobilization,” in Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.) The Dynamics of Social Movements. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
49.
Snyder, D. and C. Tilly (1972) “Hardship and collective violence in France, 1830-1960.”Amer. Soc. Rev.37: 520-532.
50.
Soboul, A. (1974) The French Revolution 1787-1799. New York: Random House.
51.
Stohl, M. (1976) War and Domestic Political Violence. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage.
52.
Strasser, H. (1976) The Normative Structure of Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
53.
Thornton, R. (1981) “Demographic antecedents of a revitalization movement: population change, population size, and the 1890 ghost dance.”Amer. Soc. Rev.46: 88-96.
54.
Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
55.
Tilly, C. (1973) “Does modernization breed revolution?”Comparative Politics5: 425-447.
56.
Tilly, C.L. Tilly , and R. Tilly (1975) The Rebellious Century: 1830-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
57.
Useem, B. and M. Useem (1979) “Government legitimacy and political stability.”Social Forces57: 840-852.
58.
Zald, M. and M. Berger (1978) “Social movements in organizations, coups d'état, insurgency, and mass movements.”Amer. J. of Sociology83: 823-861.
59.
Zald, M. and J. Mccarthy [eds.] (1979) The Dynamics of Social Movements. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
60.
Zurcher, L. , G. Kirkpatrick, R. Cushing, and C. Bowman (1971) “The anti-pornography campaign: a symbolic crusade.”Social Problems19: 217-238.
