Asymmetrical Dyads and Foreign Policy

Abstract

An analysis of Canada's foreign policy toward the United States from 1963 to 1972 is used in a test of a theory of foreign policies of subordinate states in asymmetrical dyads. In this theory the interaction of two conditions—the state of a nation's economy and the extent of concentration in its linkages with a superordinate power, along with a set of conditioning environmental factors—are used to explain the foreign policy actions of the subordinate state. The findings confirm the importance of the two main exogenous factors and the environmental variables, but the interactive effect of economic performance and linkage concentration is not corroborated. In particular the statistical effects of the economic performance variable on the foreign policy indicators are positive where a negative sign was predicted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asymmetrical Dyads and Foreign Policy Project (1979) A Manual for the Identification and Abstraction of Canada—U.S. Events, Research Reports 2, 3. Ottawa: Carleton University.

Azar, E. (1980) Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB): A Computer-Assisted Approach to Monitoring and Analyzing International Events. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Azar, E. and T. Sloan (1975) Dimensions of Interaction. Pittsburgh: International Studies Association.

Burgess, P. M. and R. W. Lawton (1972) Indicators of International Behavior: An Assessment of Events Data Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Caporaso, J. (1978a) “Introduction.” Int. Organization 32 (Winter): 1-12.

Caporaso, J. (1978b) “Dependence, dependency, and power in the global system: a structural and behavioural analysis.” Int. Organization 32 (Winter): 13-43.

Dolan, M. and B. Tomlin (1981) “Foreign policies of subordinate states in asymmetrical dyads: theoretical reformulation and empirical analysis, Canada-U.S. relations.” Presented at the National Science Foundation Conference on Dependency Reversal, Las Cruces, October. (Forthcoming Int. Studies Q.)

Dolan, M. and H. von Riekhoff (1982) “Integration and autonomy in Canada-United States relations, 1963-1972.” Canadian J. of Pol. Sci. 15 (June): 331-363.

Dolan, M. , B. Tomlin , M. Molot , and H. von Riekhoff (1980) “Foreign policies of African states in asymmetrical dyads.” Int. Studies Q. 24 (September): 415-449.

10.

Duvall, R. and J. Freeman (1981) “The state and dependent capitalism.” Int. Studies Q. 25 (March): 99-118.

11.

Herman, C. F. et al. (1973) CREON: A Foreign Events Data Set. Beverly Hills: Sage.

12.

Hirschman, A. (1978) “Beyond asymmetry: critical notes on myself as a young man and on some other old friends.” Int. Organization 32 (Winter): 45-50.

13.

International Monetary Fund (1981) World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC: author.

14.

Jodice, D. (1980) “Sources of change in Third World regimes for foreign direct investment, 1968-1976.” Int. Organization 34 (Spring): 177-206.

15.

Keohane, R. and J. Nye (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

16.

Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes,” pp. 91-196 in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Aberdeen: Cambridge Univ. Press.

17.

Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.

18.

Richardson, N. (1978) Foreign Policy and Econoic Dependence. Austin: University of Texas Press.

19.

Richardson, N. and C. Kegley (1980) “Trade dependence and foreign policy compliance: a longitudinal analysis.” Int. Studies Q. 24 (June): 191-222.

20.

Sigler, J. (1972) “Problems in the measurement of international events in the elite press,” in J. Sigler , J. Field , and M. Adelman (eds.) Applications of Events Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

21.

Tomlin, B. , M. Dolan , H. von Riekhoff , and M. Molot (1981) “Foreign policies of subordinate states in asymmetrical dyads.” Jerusalem J. of Int. Relations 5, 4: 14-40.