Because diplomatic historians Gilbert and Lauren are enthusiastic and effective exponents of interdisciplinary collaboration, it is fitting that they should assess the current state of theory on international crises. This essay evaluates four major charges in their critique: conceptual confusion, theoretical difficulties, prescriptive inadequacies, and historical insensitivity. The essay supports their premise that communication and collaboration between diplomatic historians and social scientists are essential if we are to develop empirical, policy-relevant theories of crisis. But it concludes that their interesting essay is flawed in two respects. Gilbert and Lauren aim a rather poorly calibrated shotgun at a large and diverse literature, whereas the situation would appear to call for carefully aimed rifle shots; thus, some of their shots hit the mark, but many others fly rather wide of the target. They have also missed an excellent opportunity to instruct us in ways that crisis research might be improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexandroff, A., R. Rosecrance, and A. Stein (1977) "History, quantitative analysis, and the balance of power." J. of Conflict Resolution21: 35-56.
2.
Allison, G.J. (1969) "Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis ," Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.63: 689-718.
3.
Allison, G.T. (1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Almond, G. A., S. C. Flanagan , and R. J. Mundt [eds.] ( 1973) Crisis, Choice, and Change. Boston : Little, Brown.
5.
Andriole, S.J. and R.A. Young (1977) "Toward the development of an integrated crisis warning system." Int. Studies Q.21: 107-150.
6.
Ball, G. (1962) "Lawyers and diplomats." Department of State Bulletin, 47: 987-993.
7.
Barnard, C.I. (1938) The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
8.
Binder, L. et al. (1971) Crises and Sequences in Political Development . Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press .
9.
Bobrow, D.B., S. Chan, and J.A. Kringen (1979) Understanding Foreign Policy Decisions: The Chinese Case. New York: Free Press.
10.
——— (1977) "Understanding how others treat crises: a multimethod approach." Int. Studies Q.21: 199-224.
11.
Bock, E.A. (1977) "Improving the usefulness of the case study," pp. 674-697 in D. M. Freeman (ed.) Foundations of Political Science: Research, Methods and Scope. New York: Free Press.
12.
Brady, L.P. (1974) Threat, Decision Time and Awareness: The Impact of Situational Variables on Foreign Policy Behavior. Ph.D. dissertation, OhioState University.
13.
Braybrooke, D. and C.E. Lindblom (1963) A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.
14.
Brecher, M. (1975) Decisions in Israel's Foreign Policy. London and New Haven: Oxford Univ. Press and Yale Univ. Press.
15.
Brecher, M. (1977) "Toward a theory of international crisis behavior ." Int. Studies Q.21: 39-74.
16.
Eckstein, H. (1975) "Case study and theory in political science," pp. 79-138 in F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. VII. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Erikson, E.H. (1969) Ghandi's Truth. New York: Norton.
18.
George, A.L. (1980) Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
19.
——— (1979) "Case studies and theory development: the method of structured, focused comparison," pp. 43-68 in P. G. Lauren (ed.) Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: Free Press.
20.
——— (1969) "The 'operational code': a neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making." Int. Studies Q.13: 199-222.
21.
——— and J.L. George (1956) Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study. New York: J. Day Co.
22.
George, A.L. and R. Smoke (1974) Deterrence in American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
23.
George, A.L., D.K. Hall, and W.R. Simons (1971) The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy : Laos, Cuba, Vietnam. Boston: Little, Brown.
24.
Hermann, C.F. (1972) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
25.
——— (1969) "International crisis as a situational variable ," pp. 409-421 in J. N. Rosenau (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press.
26.
——— (1963) "Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations." Admin. Science Q.1: 61-82.
27.
——— and L.P. Brady (1972) "Alternative models of international crisis behavior ," pp. 281-303 in C. F. Hermann (ed.) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
28.
Hermann, C.F. and R.E. Mason (1980) "Identifying behavioral attributes of events that trigger international crises," in O. R. Holsti , R. M. Siverson, and A. L. George (eds.) Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
29.
Holsti, O.R. (1972) Crisis, Escalation, War. Montreal : McGill-Queens Univ. Press.
30.
——— and A.L. George (1975) "The effects of stress on the performance of foreign policy-makers," pp. 255-319 in C. P. Cotter (ed.) Political Science Annual, Vol. 6. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
31.
Hopmann, P.T. and T.D. King (1980) "From cold war to détente: the role of the Cuban missile crisis and the partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty," in O. R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson , and A. L. George (eds.) Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
32.
Jervis, R. (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
33.
Johnson, R.J. (1974) Managing the White House. New York: Harper & Row.
34.
Kolko, G. and J. Kolko (1972) The Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945-1954. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
Lauren, P. G. [ed.] (1979) Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York : Free Press.
36.
McClelland, C.A. (1977) "The anticipation of international crises: prospects for theory and research." Int. Studies Q.21: 15-38.
37.
——— (1972) "The beginning, duration, and abatement of international crises: comparison in two conflict arenas," pp. 83-105 in C. F. Hermann (ed.) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
38.
——— (1964) "Action structures and communications in two international crises." Background7: 201-215.
39.
March, J.G. and H.A. Simon (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
40.
May, E.R. (1973) "Lessons" of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
41.
——— (1962) "The nature of foreign policy: the calculated versus the axiomatic." Daedalus91: 653-667.
42.
Milburn, T.W. (1972) "The management of crises," pp. 259-277 in C. F. Hermann (ed.) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
43.
Neustadt, R.E. (1970) Alliance Politics. New York : Columbia Univ. Press.
44.
Nicolay, J.G. and J. Hay (1890) Abraham Lincoln: A History Vol. III. New York: The Century Co.
45.
Nixon, R.M. (1962) Six Crises. New York: Doubleday.
46.
Paige, G.D. (1968) The Korean Decision. New York : Free Press.
47.
Parker, R.W. (1977) "An examination of basic and applied international crisis research." Int. Studies Q.21: 225-246.
48.
Robinson, J.A. (1972) "Crisis: an appraisal of concepts and theories ," pp. 20-35 in C. F. Hermann (ed.) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
49.
——— (1962) "The concept of crisis in decision-making." Series Studies in Social and Economic Sciences. Symposia Studies Series No. 11. Washington, DC: National Institute of Social and Behavioral Science.
50.
Rosenau, J. N. [ed.] (1976) In Search of Global Patterns. New York: Free Press.
51.
——— (1968) "Moral fervor, systematic analysis, and scientific consciousness in foreign policy research," pp. 197-238 in A. Ranney (ed.) Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago: Markham.
52.
Russett, B.M. (1970) "International behavior research: case studies and cumulation," pp. 425-443 in M. Haas and H. S. Kariel (eds.) Approaches to the Study of Political Science. San Francisco: Chandler.
53.
Schelling, T.C. (1963) The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
54.
Schroeder, P.W. (1977a) "Quantitative studies in the balance of power: a historian's reaction." J. of Conflict Resolution21: 3-22.
55.
——— ( 1977b) "A final rejoinder." J. of Conflict Resolution21: 57-74.
56.
Simon, H.A. (1948) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: Macmillan.
57.
Smoke. R. (1977) War: Controlling Escalation. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
58.
Snyder, G.H. (1972) "Crisis bargaining," pp. 217-256 in C. F. Hermann (ed.) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
59.
- ( 1961) Deterrence and Defense: Toward A Theory of National Security . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
60.
——— and P. Diesing (1977) Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision-Making and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
61.
Snyder, R.C., H.W. Bruck, and B. Sapin (1962) Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Approach to The Study of International Politics. New York: Free Press.
62.
Snyder, R.C. and G.D. Paige (1958) "The United States decision to resist aggression in Korea." Admin. Science Q.3: 341-378.
63.
Steinbruner, J. (1974) The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
64.
Strausz-Hupé, R. et al. (1959) Protracted Conflict. New York: Harper & Row.
65.
U.S. Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations ( 1958) Hearings, June 5.
