The Effects of Perceived Ability and Impartiality of Mediators and Time Pressure on Negotiation

Abstract

This study provided empirical clarification of the effects of factors presumed in the negotiation literature, but not clearly demonstrated, to be central to the negotiation process. One hundred and forty subjects participated in a simulated labor-management negotiation to determine the effects of perceived ability and impartiality of a mediator and time pressure on negotiation. Results showed that negotiators utilizing a mediator perceived to be high in ability gained more money, were influenced to a greater extent, and perceived the mediator as more powerful and favorable than negotiators with a mediator perceived to be low in ability. Also, negotiators bargaining with a high perceived-ability mediator ended with more money, were more influenced, and indicated more satisfaction than controls. Finally, time pressure produced more contract settlements in the high time-pressure situation than in the low time-pressure situation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartunek, J. M. , A. A. Benton , and C. B. Keys (1975 ) "Third party intervention and the bargaining behavior of group representatives." J. of Conflict Resolution 19: 532-557.

Benton, A. A. , H. H. Kelly , and B. Liebling (1972 ) "Effects of extremity of offers and concession rate on the outcomes of bargainers." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 73-83.

Berkowitz, M. , G. Goldstein , and B. P. Indik (1964 ) "The state mediator: background, self-image, and attitudes." Industrial and Labor Relations Rev. 17: 257-275.

Bigoness, W. J. (1976a) "Effects of locus of control and style of third party intervention upon bargaining behavior." J. of Applied Psychology 61: 305-312.

——— (1976b) "The impact of initial bargaining position and alternative modes of third party intervention in resolving bargaining impasses." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 17: 185-198.

French, J.R.P. and B. H. Raven (1959) "The bases of social power," in D. Cart-wright (ed.) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.

Hamner, W. C. (1974) "Effects of bargaining strategy and pressure to reach agreement in a stalemated negotiation." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 30. 458-467.

Himmelfarb, S. (1975) "What to do when the control group doesn't fit into the factorial design?" Psych. Bull. 82: 363-368.

Johnson, D. F. and D. G. Pruitt , (1972) "Preintervention effects of mediation versus arbitration." J. of Applied Psychology 56: 1-10.

10.

Johnson, D. F. and W. L. Tullar (1972) "Style of third party intervention, face-saving and bargaining behavior." J. of Experimental Social Psychology 8: 319-330.

11.

Komorita, S. S. and A. R. Brenner (1968) "Bargaining and concession making under bilateral monopoly." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 15-20.

12.

Landsberger, H. A. (1960) "The behavior and personality of the labor mediator: the parties' perception of mediator behavior." Personnel Psychology 13: 329-347.

13.

——— (1956) "Final report on research project in mediation." Labor Law J 7: 501-508.

14.

Maggiolo, W. A. (1971) Techniques of Mediation in Labor Disputes Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.

15.

Manson, J. J. (1958) "Mediators and their qualifications." Labor Law J. 9: 755-764.

16.

McGrath, J. E. (1966) "A social psychological approach to the study of negotiation," in R. V. Bowers (ed.) Studies on Behavior in Organizations. Athens : Univ. of Georgia.

17.

Nayar, E.S.K. , H. Touzard , and D. A. Summers ( 1968) "Training, tasks and mediator orientation in heterocultural negotiations." Human Relations 21: 283-294.

18.

Rhemus, C. M. (1965) "The mediation of industrial conflict: a note on the literature." J. of Conflict Resolution 9: 118-126.

19.

Rubin, J. Z. and B. R. Brown (1975) The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation New York: Academic Press.

20.

Simikin, W. E. (1971) Mediation and the Dynamics of Collective Bargaining Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

21.

Touval, S. (1975) "Biased intermediaries: theoretical and historical considerations." Jerusalem J. of Int. Relations 1: 51-69.

22.

Weschler, I. R. (1950) "The personal factor in labor mediation." Personnel Psychology 3: 113-132.

23.

Young, O. R. (1967) The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises Princeton, N.J. Princeton Univ Press.

24.

Yukl, G. A. (1974) "A review of laboratory research on two party conflict negotiation." Unpublished manuscript, Baruch College.