The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project

Abstract

As students of politics and political science, we should and we do care about the events which lead to war, instability, and international tension as well as about events which lead to equitable interdependence, integration, peace, improvement of quality of life, reduction of colonialism, and so on. Because we care about these matters, we try to advance procedures and theories about systematizing our observations and improving our skills of analysis. Recent developments in international relations have tended to (a) emphasize the exploration of more specific problems and testing of hypotheses with quantified data and (b) deemphasized the search for general theories of internation behavior. This trend appears to be undergoing slight modification for many reasons. Events contain useful information which permit a student of foreign policy to use events singularly or in the aggregate to study foreign policy outputs and inputs. A student of international systems uses events singularly or in the aggregate to study patterns, structures, and transformation. This research calls for continuously developing models and operational procedures which analyze these phenomena with faster and better numerical precision. The Conflict and Peace Data Bank Project is the contribution of myself, my students, and my colleagues to this effort.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALKER, H. and P. G. BOCH (1972) “International relations: contributions from the International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.” Pol. Sci. Annual 3: 385–495.

AZAR, E. E. (1980) COPDAB Codebook. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

RAPOPORT, A. (1978). “An early warning model of international hostilities, ” In N. Choucri and T. Robinson (eds.) Forecasting International Relations: Theory, Methods, Problems and Prospects. San Francisco: Freeman.

RAPOPORT, A. (1975). “Ten issues in events research, ” In E. E. Azar and J. Ben-Dak (eds.) Theory and Practice of Events Research: Studies in International Actions and Interactions. New York: Gordon & Breach.

RAPOPORT, A. (1970) “Analysis of international events.” Peace Research Rev. 4, 1: 1–113.

RAPOPORT, A. and T. SLOAN (1975) Dimensions of Interaction: A Source Book. Pittsburgh, PA: International Studies Association.

AZAR, I. F. and T. HAVENER (1976) “Discontinuities of the symbolic environment: a problem in scaling events.” Int. Interactions 2, 4: 231–246.

HEISE, D. (1978) Computer Assisted Analysis of Social Events Using Program Interact and Survey. Chapel Hill: IRSS, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

HEISE, D. (1977) “Social action as a theory of affect.” Behavior Sci. 22: 163–177.

10.

SUPPES, P. (1969) “Stimulus-response theory of finite automata.” J. of Mathematical Psychology 6: 327–355.

11.

ZINNES, D. A. (1976) Contemporary Research in International Relations. New York: Macmillan.