The assessment of the selection of strategy is studied using documents of a specific case of Dutch foreign policy from the beginning of World War I. First, a content analysis procedure was developed in order to search for the relevant concepts in the documents and to represent the argumentations in decision trees. Thereafter, the applicability of several decision critena to the data is discussed. In order to describe the data, an alternative decision rule had to be developed, one which can be considered an adaptation of Simon's satisficing principle.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Axelrod, R. (1976) The Structure of DecisionPrinceton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
2.
Coombs, C. H., T. G Bezembinder , and F. H. Goode (1967 ) "Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability."J. of Mathematical Psychology4: 72.
3.
Coombs, C. H., R. M. Davis , and A. Tversky (1970 ) Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary IntroductionEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Fischer, F. (1961) Griff nach der WeltmachtDusseldorf: Droste .
5.
Fishburn, P. C. (1964) Decision and Value TheoryPublication in Operations Research, No. 10. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Gallhofer, I. N. (1979) "The decision of the Dutch Council of Ministers and the military commander-in-chief relating to the reduction of armed forces in Autumn, 1916."Acta Politica1.
7.
——— ( 1978) "Coders' reliability in the study of decision making concepts, replications in time and across topics," in Methoden en Data Nieuwsbrief, Sociaal-Wetenschappelijke Sectie van de Vereniging voor Statistiek Vol. I (February).
8.
——— and W. E. Saris (forthcoming) "Analysis of the argumentation of decision makers using decision trees."Quality and Quantity.
9.
Holsti, O. (1976) "Foreign policy formation viewed cognitively," ch. 2 in R. Axelrod, The Structure of Decision.Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
10.
Leiserson, M. ( 1970) The Study of Coalition Behavior: Theoretical Perspectives and Cases from Four ContinentsNew York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11.
Lukkenaer, N. A. (1978) Gevarenanalyse: vertrouwelijk, maar onbetrouwbaar, in Wetenschap en Samenleving 17(February).
12.
Von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1947) Theory of Games and Economic BehaviorPrinceton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
13.
Raiffa, H. (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under CertaintyReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
RGP IV (n.d.) Bescheiden betreffende de buitenlandse politick van Nederland, 1895-1919.
15.
Rapoport, A. (1966) Two-Person Game Theory, The Essential IdeasAnn Arbor.Univ. of Michigan Press.
16.
Saris, W. E. and I. N. Gallhofer ( 1975) "L'application d'un modele de decision a des données historiques."Revue Française de Sciences Politiques25: 473.
17.
Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of Man, Social and RationalNew York: John Wiley.
18.
Smit, C. (1972) Nederland in de Eerste Wereldoorlog (1899-1919 Vol. 2. Groningen. Wolters Noordhoff.
19.
——— (1950) Diplomatieke geschiedenis van Nederland, in zonderheid sedert de vestiging van het Koninkrijk's-Gravenhage: M. Nijhoff.
20.
Tversky, A. (1967) "Additivity utility and subjective probability."J. of Mathematical Psychology4: 175.
21.
Vandenbosch, A. (1959) Dutch Foreign Policy Since 1815The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
22.
Vlek, C.A.J. and W. A. Wagenaar (1976) Oordelen en beslissen in onzekerheid,ch. 14 in Handboek der PsychonomieDeventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
23.
Wallsten, T. S. (1971) "Subjectively expected utility theory and subjects' probability estimates: use of measurement-free techniques."J. of Experimental Psychology80: 31.
24.
Zechlin, E. (1964) Deutschland zwischen Kabinetts—unf Wirtschaftskrieg, in Historisches Zeitschrift Vol. 199. Munchen: R. Oldenberg.